All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ath10k: Fix potential Rx ring corruption
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:01:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B17716.40609@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B07420.8090600@candelatech.com>

Well, problem is not solved after all.  Had total of 5 crashes on overnight run, must have
all been before midnight, because that is the earliest logs I see (journald was not configured
to use enough space...fixed for next time) and no crashes since then.

Still, it is at least no worse.

I wonder if similar wb() is needed in the firmware somewhere?

Thanks,
Ben

On 01/09/2015 04:36 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> I added this to my tree (and a bunch more debug stuff to track
> CE transport-ids), and I've done about 4500 station reconnects over
> the last 2 hours and no tx-credits hang issue so far.
>
> Could be my debugging code or that I'm getting lucky, but I'm hopeful
> that your patch actually fixed the problem I was seeing!
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>
> On 01/09/2015 09:19 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
>> When replenishing Rx buffers driver updates the address of the
>> buffer and the index of rx buffer in rx ring to the firmware.
>> Change in order by CPU can cause rx ring corruption. Add memory
>> barrier before updating rx buffer index to guarantee the order.
>>
>> This could fix some instances of rx ring corruption due to done
>> bit in rx attention flag not set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c |    5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
>> index 9c782a4..baa1c44 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
>> @@ -97,6 +97,11 @@ static int __ath10k_htt_rx_ring_fill_n(struct ath10k_htt *htt, int num)
>>   	}
>>
>>   fail:
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Make sure the rx buffer is updated before available buffer
>> +	 * index to avoid any potential rx ring corruption.
>> +	 */
>> +	mb();
>>   	*htt->rx_ring.alloc_idx.vaddr = __cpu_to_le32(idx);
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>
>
>

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ath10k: Fix potential Rx ring corruption
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:01:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B17716.40609@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B07420.8090600@candelatech.com>

Well, problem is not solved after all.  Had total of 5 crashes on overnight run, must have
all been before midnight, because that is the earliest logs I see (journald was not configured
to use enough space...fixed for next time) and no crashes since then.

Still, it is at least no worse.

I wonder if similar wb() is needed in the firmware somewhere?

Thanks,
Ben

On 01/09/2015 04:36 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> I added this to my tree (and a bunch more debug stuff to track
> CE transport-ids), and I've done about 4500 station reconnects over
> the last 2 hours and no tx-credits hang issue so far.
>
> Could be my debugging code or that I'm getting lucky, but I'm hopeful
> that your patch actually fixed the problem I was seeing!
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>
> On 01/09/2015 09:19 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
>> When replenishing Rx buffers driver updates the address of the
>> buffer and the index of rx buffer in rx ring to the firmware.
>> Change in order by CPU can cause rx ring corruption. Add memory
>> barrier before updating rx buffer index to guarantee the order.
>>
>> This could fix some instances of rx ring corruption due to done
>> bit in rx attention flag not set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c |    5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
>> index 9c782a4..baa1c44 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
>> @@ -97,6 +97,11 @@ static int __ath10k_htt_rx_ring_fill_n(struct ath10k_htt *htt, int num)
>>   	}
>>
>>   fail:
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Make sure the rx buffer is updated before available buffer
>> +	 * index to avoid any potential rx ring corruption.
>> +	 */
>> +	mb();
>>   	*htt->rx_ring.alloc_idx.vaddr = __cpu_to_le32(idx);
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>
>
>

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-10 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-09 17:19 [PATCH RESEND] ath10k: Fix potential Rx ring corruption Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2015-01-09 17:19 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2015-01-10  0:36 ` Ben Greear
2015-01-10  0:36   ` Ben Greear
2015-01-10 19:01   ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-01-10 19:01     ` Ben Greear
     [not found]     ` <1420969591846.36256@qti.qualcomm.com>
2015-01-11 10:06       ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2015-01-11 10:06         ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2015-01-11 15:33         ` Ben Greear
2015-01-11 15:33           ` Ben Greear
2015-01-13 14:22 ` Kalle Valo
2015-01-13 14:22   ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B17716.40609@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.