All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: fix runtime warning
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:32:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B34035.60107@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150109111642.GU14516@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Hi Charles,

On 01/09/2015 07:16 PM, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:53:40PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>> As the commit 5fe5b76 (ASoC: dapm: Do not pretend to support
>> controls for non mixer/mux widgets) remove the fake control.
>>
>> Then, the wm8904 throw out the following warning at runtime.
>> --->8---
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCL -> [Left] -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCL --> Left --> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCL -> Left -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCR -> [Right] -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCR --> Right --> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCR -> Right -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCL -> [Left] -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCL --> Left --> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCL -> Left -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCR -> [Right] -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCR --> Right --> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCR -> Right -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINR -> [Right] -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINR --> Right --> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINR -> Right -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINL -> [Left] -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINL --> Left --> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINL -> Left -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINR -> [Right] -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINR --> Right --> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINR -> Right -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINL -> [Left] -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINL --> Left --> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINL -> Left -> DACR
>> ---8<---
>>
>> This patch is used to remove these warning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> index 4d2d2b1..38582d7 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> @@ -1076,10 +1076,10 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route adc_intercon[] = {
>>   	{ "Right Capture PGA", NULL, "Right Capture Mux" },
>>   	{ "Right Capture PGA", NULL, "Right Capture Inverting Mux" },
>>
>> -	{ "AIFOUTL", "Left",  "ADCL" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTL", "Right", "ADCR" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTR", "Left",  "ADCL" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTR", "Right", "ADCR" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTL", NULL, "ADCL" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTL", NULL, "ADCR" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTR", NULL, "ADCL" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTR", NULL, "ADCR" },
>
> Is this the right fix here? I am not super familiar with the
> driver but it appears to contain an "AIFOUTL Mux" control which
> is not connected to anything. Looks like maybe this is a mistake
> the mux is indeded to be included in the path? Feels like we
> should either remove the control as well or hook it into the
> path.

Thank for your information.
I think here it should correct the path name as
--->8---
{ "AIFOUTL Mux", "Left",  "ADCL" },
{ "AIFOUTL Mux", "Right", "ADCR" },
{ "AIFOUTR Mux", "Left",  "ADCL" },
{ "AIFOUTR Mux", "Right", "ADCR" },
---8<---

Thanks again. I will send out the new version.

> Thanks,
> Charles
>

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: fix runtime warning
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:32:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B34035.60107@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150109111642.GU14516@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Hi Charles,

On 01/09/2015 07:16 PM, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:53:40PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>> As the commit 5fe5b76 (ASoC: dapm: Do not pretend to support
>> controls for non mixer/mux widgets) remove the fake control.
>>
>> Then, the wm8904 throw out the following warning at runtime.
>> --->8---
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCL -> [Left] -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCL --> Left --> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCL -> Left -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCR -> [Right] -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCR --> Right --> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCR -> Right -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCL -> [Left] -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCL --> Left --> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCL -> Left -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCR -> [Right] -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCR --> Right --> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCR -> Right -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINR -> [Right] -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINR --> Right --> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINR -> Right -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINL -> [Left] -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINL --> Left --> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINL -> Left -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINR -> [Right] -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINR --> Right --> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINR -> Right -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINL -> [Left] -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINL --> Left --> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINL -> Left -> DACR
>> ---8<---
>>
>> This patch is used to remove these warning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> index 4d2d2b1..38582d7 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> @@ -1076,10 +1076,10 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route adc_intercon[] = {
>>   	{ "Right Capture PGA", NULL, "Right Capture Mux" },
>>   	{ "Right Capture PGA", NULL, "Right Capture Inverting Mux" },
>>
>> -	{ "AIFOUTL", "Left",  "ADCL" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTL", "Right", "ADCR" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTR", "Left",  "ADCL" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTR", "Right", "ADCR" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTL", NULL, "ADCL" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTL", NULL, "ADCR" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTR", NULL, "ADCL" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTR", NULL, "ADCR" },
>
> Is this the right fix here? I am not super familiar with the
> driver but it appears to contain an "AIFOUTL Mux" control which
> is not connected to anything. Looks like maybe this is a mistake
> the mux is indeded to be included in the path? Feels like we
> should either remove the control as well or hook it into the
> path.

Thank for your information.
I think here it should correct the path name as
--->8---
{ "AIFOUTL Mux", "Left",  "ADCL" },
{ "AIFOUTL Mux", "Right", "ADCR" },
{ "AIFOUTR Mux", "Left",  "ADCL" },
{ "AIFOUTR Mux", "Right", "ADCR" },
---8<---

Thanks again. I will send out the new version.

> Thanks,
> Charles
>

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: voice.shen@atmel.com (Bo Shen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: fix runtime warning
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:32:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B34035.60107@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150109111642.GU14516@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Hi Charles,

On 01/09/2015 07:16 PM, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:53:40PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>> As the commit 5fe5b76 (ASoC: dapm: Do not pretend to support
>> controls for non mixer/mux widgets) remove the fake control.
>>
>> Then, the wm8904 throw out the following warning at runtime.
>> --->8---
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCL -> [Left] -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCL --> Left --> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCL -> Left -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCR -> [Right] -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCR --> Right --> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCR -> Right -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCL -> [Left] -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCL --> Left --> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCL -> Left -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCR -> [Right] -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCR --> Right --> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCR -> Right -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINR -> [Right] -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINR --> Right --> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINR -> Right -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINL -> [Left] -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINL --> Left --> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINL -> Left -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINR -> [Right] -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINR --> Right --> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINR -> Right -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINL -> [Left] -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINL --> Left --> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINL -> Left -> DACR
>> ---8<---
>>
>> This patch is used to remove these warning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> index 4d2d2b1..38582d7 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> @@ -1076,10 +1076,10 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route adc_intercon[] = {
>>   	{ "Right Capture PGA", NULL, "Right Capture Mux" },
>>   	{ "Right Capture PGA", NULL, "Right Capture Inverting Mux" },
>>
>> -	{ "AIFOUTL", "Left",  "ADCL" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTL", "Right", "ADCR" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTR", "Left",  "ADCL" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTR", "Right", "ADCR" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTL", NULL, "ADCL" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTL", NULL, "ADCR" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTR", NULL, "ADCL" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTR", NULL, "ADCR" },
>
> Is this the right fix here? I am not super familiar with the
> driver but it appears to contain an "AIFOUTL Mux" control which
> is not connected to anything. Looks like maybe this is a mistake
> the mux is indeded to be included in the path? Feels like we
> should either remove the control as well or hook it into the
> path.

Thank for your information.
I think here it should correct the path name as
--->8---
{ "AIFOUTL Mux", "Left",  "ADCL" },
{ "AIFOUTL Mux", "Right", "ADCR" },
{ "AIFOUTR Mux", "Left",  "ADCL" },
{ "AIFOUTR Mux", "Right", "ADCR" },
---8<---

Thanks again. I will send out the new version.

> Thanks,
> Charles
>

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: fix runtime warning
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:32:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B34035.60107@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150109111642.GU14516@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Hi Charles,

On 01/09/2015 07:16 PM, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:53:40PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
>> As the commit 5fe5b76 (ASoC: dapm: Do not pretend to support
>> controls for non mixer/mux widgets) remove the fake control.
>>
>> Then, the wm8904 throw out the following warning at runtime.
>> --->8---
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCL -> [Left] -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCL --> Left --> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCL -> Left -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCR -> [Right] -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCR --> Right --> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCR -> Right -> AIFOUTL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCL -> [Left] -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCL --> Left --> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCL -> Left -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path ADCR -> [Right] -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for ADCR --> Right --> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route ADCR -> Right -> AIFOUTR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINR -> [Right] -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINR --> Right --> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINR -> Right -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINL -> [Left] -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINL --> Left --> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINL -> Left -> DACL
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINR -> [Right] -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINR --> Right --> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINR -> Right -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: Control not supported for path AIFINL -> [Left] -> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: no dapm match for AIFINL --> Left --> DACR
>> wm8904 1-001a: ASoC: Failed to add route AIFINL -> Left -> DACR
>> ---8<---
>>
>> This patch is used to remove these warning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> index 4d2d2b1..38582d7 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8904.c
>> @@ -1076,10 +1076,10 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route adc_intercon[] = {
>>   	{ "Right Capture PGA", NULL, "Right Capture Mux" },
>>   	{ "Right Capture PGA", NULL, "Right Capture Inverting Mux" },
>>
>> -	{ "AIFOUTL", "Left",  "ADCL" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTL", "Right", "ADCR" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTR", "Left",  "ADCL" },
>> -	{ "AIFOUTR", "Right", "ADCR" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTL", NULL, "ADCL" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTL", NULL, "ADCR" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTR", NULL, "ADCL" },
>> +	{ "AIFOUTR", NULL, "ADCR" },
>
> Is this the right fix here? I am not super familiar with the
> driver but it appears to contain an "AIFOUTL Mux" control which
> is not connected to anything. Looks like maybe this is a mistake
> the mux is indeded to be included in the path? Feels like we
> should either remove the control as well or hook it into the
> path.

Thank for your information.
I think here it should correct the path name as
--->8---
{ "AIFOUTL Mux", "Left",  "ADCL" },
{ "AIFOUTL Mux", "Right", "ADCR" },
{ "AIFOUTR Mux", "Left",  "ADCL" },
{ "AIFOUTR Mux", "Right", "ADCR" },
---8<---

Thanks again. I will send out the new version.

> Thanks,
> Charles
>

Best Regards,
Bo Shen

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-12  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-09  8:53 [PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: fix runtime warning Bo Shen
2015-01-09  8:53 ` Bo Shen
2015-01-09  8:53 ` Bo Shen
2015-01-09  8:53 ` Bo Shen
2015-01-09 11:16 ` [alsa-devel] " Charles Keepax
2015-01-09 11:16   ` Charles Keepax
2015-01-09 11:16   ` Charles Keepax
2015-01-12  3:32   ` Bo Shen [this message]
2015-01-12  3:32     ` Bo Shen
2015-01-12  3:32     ` Bo Shen
2015-01-12  3:32     ` Bo Shen
2015-01-12  9:30     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-01-12  9:30       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-01-12  9:30       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-01-13  5:36       ` Bo Shen
2015-01-13  5:36         ` Bo Shen
2015-01-13  5:36         ` Bo Shen
2015-01-13  5:36         ` Bo Shen
2015-01-13  8:56         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-01-13  8:56           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-01-13  8:56           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-01-13  9:33           ` Bo Shen
2015-01-13  9:33             ` Bo Shen
2015-01-13  9:33             ` Bo Shen
2015-01-13  9:33             ` Bo Shen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B34035.60107@atmel.com \
    --to=voice.shen@atmel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.