diff for duplicates of <54B47C66.1010805@nvidia.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 0dd38c4..612123b 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -5,8 +5,3 @@ On 01/12/2015 07:31 AM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
 
 nouveau_bo_wr16() being presumably used (since it is not removed by this 
 patch), it sounds safe to keep its read counterpart?
-
-_______________________________________________
-dri-devel mailing list
-dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index c8128a2..22d74bd 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
  "To\0Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se>"
   David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
  " Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>\0"
- "Cc\0Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>"
+ "Cc\0Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>"
+  Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
  " Christian K\303\266nig <christian.koenig@amd.com>"
   dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
  " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0"
@@ -17,11 +18,6 @@
  "> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.\n"
  "\n"
  "nouveau_bo_wr16() being presumably used (since it is not removed by this \n"
- "patch), it sounds safe to keep its read counterpart?\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "dri-devel mailing list\n"
- "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org\n"
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
+ patch), it sounds safe to keep its read counterpart?
 
-da2237f61a7b31c340edd9d7aec015e3a19e1fa13ed4ccfcd952652f6137f869
+8dbc92fefc0afa84fec1dd06429cbce719b181761abd4d246ed9285a4e5af48e
