[PATCH net-next v13 3/3] net: hisilicon: new hip04 ethernet driver

[dingtianhong@huawei.com (Ding Tianhong)]

On 2015/1/15 12:39, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 14:34 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Support Hisilicon hip04 ethernet driver, including 100M / 1000M controller.
>> The controller has no tx done interrupt, reclaim xmitted buffer in the poll.
> 
> Mostly trivial comments:
> 
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hip04_eth.c
> 
> []
> 
>> +#define GMAC_MAX_PKT_LEN		1516
> 
> []
> 
>> +static int hip04_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>> +{
> []
>> +	while (cnt && !last) {
> []
>> +		desc = (struct rx_desc *)skb->data;
>> +		len = be16_to_cpu(desc->pkt_len);
>> +		err = be32_to_cpu(desc->pkt_err);
>> +
>> +		if (0 == len) {
>> +			dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>> +			last = true;
>> +		} else if ((err & RX_PKT_ERR) || (len >= GMAC_MAX_PKT_LEN)) {
> 
> Is this ">=" correct?  Maybe it should be ">" ?
> 
> []
> 
>> +static irqreturn_t hip04_mac_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct net_device *ndev = (struct net_device *)dev_id;
> 
> Unnecessary cast of void *
> 
> []
> 
>> +static int hip04_set_coalesce(struct net_device *netdev,
>> +			      struct ethtool_coalesce *ec)
>> +{
>> +	struct hip04_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
>> +
>> +	/* Check not supported parameters  */
>> +	if ((ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames) || (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_irq) ||
>> +	    (ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq) || (ec->tx_coalesce_usecs_irq) ||
>> +	    (ec->use_adaptive_rx_coalesce) || (ec->use_adaptive_tx_coalesce) ||
>> +	    (ec->pkt_rate_low) || (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_low) ||
>> +	    (ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_low) || (ec->tx_coalesce_usecs_high) ||
>> +	    (ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_low) || (ec->pkt_rate_high) ||
>> +	    (ec->tx_coalesce_usecs_low) || (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_high) ||
>> +	    (ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_high) || (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs) ||
>> +	    (ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_irq) ||
>> +	    (ec->stats_block_coalesce_usecs) ||
>> +	    (ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_high) || (ec->rate_sample_interval))
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> Rather than a somewhat haphazard mix of these values, 
> this might be simpler to read as something like:
> 
> 	/* Check not supported parameters  */
> 	if (ec->pkt_rate_low ||
> 	    ec->pkt_rate_high ||
> 
> 	    ec->use_adaptive_rx_coalesce ||
> 	    ec->rx_coalesce_usecs ||
> 	    ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_low ||
> 	    ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_high ||
> 	    ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_irq ||
> 	    ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames ||
> 	    ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_low ||
> 	    ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_high ||
> 	    ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq ||
> 	    
> 	    ec->use_adaptive_tx_coalesce ||
> 	    ec->tx_coalesce_usecs_low ||
> 	    ec->tx_coalesce_usecs_high ||
> 	    ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_low ||
> 	    ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_high ||
> 	    ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_irq ||
> 
> 	    ec->stats_block_coalesce_usecs ||
> 	    ec->rate_sample_interval)
> 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> 
>> +static void hip04_free_ring(struct net_device *ndev, struct device *d)
>> +{
>> +	struct hip04_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < RX_DESC_NUM; i++)
>> +		if (priv->rx_buf[i])
>> +			put_page(virt_to_head_page(priv->rx_buf[i]));
> 
> It's generally nicer to use braces around
> for loops with single ifs.
> 
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < TX_DESC_NUM; i++)
>> +		if (priv->tx_skb[i])
>> +			dev_kfree_skb_any(priv->tx_skb[i]);
> 
> 
> 

OK, fix them later, thanks.

Ding

> .
>