From: Raimonds Cicans <ray@apollo.lv>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
gtmkramer@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cx23885/vb2 regression: please test this patch
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:02:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BA4F58.5060809@apollo.lv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BA42CD.3050908@xs4all.nl>
On 17.01.2015 13:09, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Thanks. This was with one frontend? And what was the exact sequence of commands
> used to replicate this?
>
> Sorry, but I need precise details of how you reproduce this, especially since I
> can't reproduce it.
This test was run on first front end.
I just started "w_scan -fs -s S13E0 -D0c -a 4" (which mean: do satellite
channel
scan using S13E0 initial transponder list on first DiSEqC port on
adapter 4) and
waited until error appeared in "dmesg --follow". It may take some time
(for me
in average 5-15 minutes)
> I'm pretty sure there are multiple issues here, one of them is fixed by my vb2
> patch, but this page fault is almost certainly a separate problem.
>
> Based on past reports there is also a possible problem with multiple frontends,
> but I don't have hardware like that and even if I had I am not sure I would be
> able to test it properly. Besides, that issue seemed to be unrelated to the
> vb2 conversion. It's all pretty vague, though.
IMHO: I also think problem is with multiple front ends,
because on some usage patterns problem almost go away
IMHO: page fault problem IS related to the vb2 conversion, because
1) I did not have this problem on kernel 3.13.10
2) during bisection this error appeared exactly on conversation commit
Can we test multiple front ends version? Because you do not have hardware
I propose to test it other way around: can you make patch which disables or
ignores one front end on my hardware (TBS 6981)?
Raimonds Cicans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-17 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-13 14:01 [PATCH] cx23885/vb2 regression: please test this patch Hans Verkuil
2015-01-13 16:59 ` Jurgen Kramer
2015-01-15 16:32 ` Jurgen Kramer
2015-01-16 14:58 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-01-16 16:48 ` Jurgen Kramer
2015-01-18 8:54 ` Jurgen Kramer
2015-01-18 10:40 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-01-18 12:35 ` Jurgen Kramer
2015-01-13 17:55 ` Raimonds Cicans
2015-01-14 6:16 ` Raimonds Cicans
2015-01-16 14:54 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-01-16 16:20 ` Raimonds Cicans
2015-01-16 16:48 ` Luis Alves
2015-01-16 17:38 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-01-16 17:40 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-01-16 19:05 ` Raimonds Cicans
2015-01-17 11:09 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-01-17 12:02 ` Raimonds Cicans [this message]
2015-01-17 12:30 ` Tycho Lürsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BA4F58.5060809@apollo.lv \
--to=ray@apollo.lv \
--cc=gtmkramer@xs4all.nl \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.