All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>,
	Max Gurtuvoy <maxg@mellanox.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
	linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/srp: Process REQ_PREEMPT requests correctly
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:34:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54CB9670.6080108@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CAE71C.6020002@cs.wisc.edu>

On 01/30/15 03:06, Mike Christie wrote:
> I think I figured this out. I think we want to change the
> scsi_prep_state_check check instead of each driver/class.
> 
> It looks like for the SDEV_QUIESCE state we want to allow REQ_PREEMPT
> commands. James would know best, but I think SPI needs that ability.
> 
> For SDEV_BLOCK/SDEV_CREATED_BLOCK, it looks like drivers/classes that
> use that state do not want any commands to be queued at that time,
> because the transport is normally down.

Hello Mike,

Is something like the patch below what you had in mind ?

Bart.

[PATCH] Defer processing of REQ_PREEMPT requests for blocked devices

SCSI transport drivers and SCSI LLDs block a SCSI device if the
transport layer is not operational. This means that in this state
no requests should be processed, even if the REQ_PREEMPT flag has
been set. This patch avoids that a rescan shortly after a cable
pull sporadically triggers the following kernel oops:

BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc9001a6bc084
IP: [<ffffffffa04e08f2>] mlx4_ib_post_send+0xd2/0xb30 [mlx4_ib]
Process rescan-scsi-bus (pid: 9241, threadinfo ffff88053484a000, task ffff880534aae100)
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa0718135>] srp_post_send+0x65/0x70 [ib_srp]
 [<ffffffffa071b9df>] srp_queuecommand+0x1cf/0x3e0 [ib_srp]
 [<ffffffffa0001ff1>] scsi_dispatch_cmd+0x101/0x280 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffffa0009ad1>] scsi_request_fn+0x411/0x4d0 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffff81223b37>] __blk_run_queue+0x27/0x30
 [<ffffffff8122a8d2>] blk_execute_rq_nowait+0x82/0x110
 [<ffffffff8122a9c2>] blk_execute_rq+0x62/0xf0
 [<ffffffffa000b0e8>] scsi_execute+0xe8/0x190 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffffa000b2f3>] scsi_execute_req+0xa3/0x130 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffffa000c1aa>] scsi_probe_lun+0x17a/0x450 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffffa000ce86>] scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x156/0x480 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffffa000dc2f>] __scsi_scan_target+0xdf/0x1f0 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffffa000dfa3>] scsi_scan_host_selected+0x183/0x1c0 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffffa000edfb>] scsi_scan+0xdb/0xe0 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffffa000ee13>] store_scan+0x13/0x20 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffff811c8d9b>] sysfs_write_file+0xcb/0x160
 [<ffffffff811589de>] vfs_write+0xce/0x140
 [<ffffffff81158b53>] sys_write+0x53/0xa0
 [<ffffffff81464592>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
 [<00007f611c9d9300>] 0x7f611c9d92ff

---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c   | 4 +++-
 include/linux/blk_types.h | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 17bb541..7129701 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -1311,9 +1311,11 @@ scsi_prep_state_check(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
 				    "rejecting I/O to dead device\n");
 			ret = BLKPREP_KILL;
 			break;
-		case SDEV_QUIESCE:
 		case SDEV_BLOCK:
 		case SDEV_CREATED_BLOCK:
+			ret = BLKPREP_DEFER;
+			break;
+		case SDEV_QUIESCE:
 			/*
 			 * If the devices is blocked we defer normal commands.
 			 */
diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
index c294e3e..a1b25e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
@@ -181,7 +181,9 @@ enum rq_flag_bits {
 	__REQ_ELVPRIV,		/* elevator private data attached */
 	__REQ_FAILED,		/* set if the request failed */
 	__REQ_QUIET,		/* don't worry about errors */
-	__REQ_PREEMPT,		/* set for "ide_preempt" requests */
+	__REQ_PREEMPT,		/* set for "ide_preempt" requests and also
+				   for requests for which the SCSI "quiesce"
+				   state must be ignored. */
 	__REQ_ALLOCED,		/* request came from our alloc pool */
 	__REQ_COPY_USER,	/* contains copies of user pages */
 	__REQ_FLUSH_SEQ,	/* request for flush sequence */
-- 
2.1.4



  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-30 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-29 13:02 [PATCH] IB/srp: Process REQ_PREEMPT requests correctly Bart Van Assche
     [not found] ` <54CA2F48.605-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-29 13:44   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-01-29 19:38 ` Mike Christie
2015-01-30  2:06   ` Mike Christie
2015-01-30 14:34     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
     [not found]       ` <54CB9670.6080108-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-30 20:18         ` Mike Christie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54CB9670.6080108@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=roland@purestorage.com \
    --cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.