From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Andrew
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:19:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D7A1AD.3050108@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwZOgiUe5Zm=o24d6SshvoLbF1bq_VT0hdijR1hfoyi4A@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/06/2015 09:55 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Raghavendra K T
> <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Paravirt spinlock clears slowpath flag after doing unlock.
> [ fix edited out ]
>
> So I'm not going to be applying this for 3.19, because it's much too
> late and the patch is too scary. Plus the bug probably effectively
> never shows up in real life (it is probably easy to trigger the
> speculative *read* but probably never the actual speculative write
> after dropping the lock last).
>
Understood and agreed.
> This will need a lot of testing by the paravirt people - both
> performance and correctness. So *maybe* for 3.20, but maybe for even
> later, and then marked for stable, of course.
>
> Are there any good paravirt stress-tests that people could run for
> extended times?
>
I have been running several benchmarks (kern, sys, hack, ebizzy etc in
in 1x,2x scenarios. I run them for performance test as well.
(In the current patch I did not get kvm hang in normal run, But
overcommit reproduced it).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Andrew Mort
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:19:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D7A1AD.3050108@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwZOgiUe5Zm=o24d6SshvoLbF1bq_VT0hdijR1hfoyi4A@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/06/2015 09:55 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Raghavendra K T
> <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Paravirt spinlock clears slowpath flag after doing unlock.
> [ fix edited out ]
>
> So I'm not going to be applying this for 3.19, because it's much too
> late and the patch is too scary. Plus the bug probably effectively
> never shows up in real life (it is probably easy to trigger the
> speculative *read* but probably never the actual speculative write
> after dropping the lock last).
>
Understood and agreed.
> This will need a lot of testing by the paravirt people - both
> performance and correctness. So *maybe* for 3.20, but maybe for even
> later, and then marked for stable, of course.
>
> Are there any good paravirt stress-tests that people could run for
> extended times?
>
I have been running several benchmarks (kern, sys, hack, ebizzy etc in
in 1x,2x scenarios. I run them for performance test as well.
(In the current patch I did not get kvm hang in normal run, But
overcommit reproduced it).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:19:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D7A1AD.3050108@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwZOgiUe5Zm=o24d6SshvoLbF1bq_VT0hdijR1hfoyi4A@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/06/2015 09:55 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Raghavendra K T
> <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Paravirt spinlock clears slowpath flag after doing unlock.
> [ fix edited out ]
>
> So I'm not going to be applying this for 3.19, because it's much too
> late and the patch is too scary. Plus the bug probably effectively
> never shows up in real life (it is probably easy to trigger the
> speculative *read* but probably never the actual speculative write
> after dropping the lock last).
>
Understood and agreed.
> This will need a lot of testing by the paravirt people - both
> performance and correctness. So *maybe* for 3.20, but maybe for even
> later, and then marked for stable, of course.
>
> Are there any good paravirt stress-tests that people could run for
> extended times?
>
I have been running several benchmarks (kern, sys, hack, ebizzy etc in
in 1x,2x scenarios. I run them for performance test as well.
(In the current patch I did not get kvm hang in normal run, But
overcommit reproduced it).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-08 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-06 14:49 [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 15:20 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 15:20 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 17:03 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2015-02-06 17:03 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2015-02-06 17:03 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2015-02-06 17:03 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2015-02-06 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-08 17:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-08 17:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-08 17:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-06 15:20 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 19:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-06 19:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-06 21:15 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 21:15 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 21:15 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 21:15 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 23:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-06 23:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-06 23:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-06 23:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-06 19:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-06 19:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-08 17:49 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-08 17:49 ` Raghavendra K T [this message]
2015-02-08 17:49 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-08 17:49 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 18:57 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 18:57 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-08 17:57 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-08 17:57 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-08 17:57 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 18:57 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-08 21:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-08 21:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-09 9:34 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 9:34 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 12:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-09 12:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-09 12:52 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 12:52 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 12:52 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-10 0:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-10 0:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-10 0:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-10 0:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-10 9:30 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-10 9:30 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-10 9:30 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-10 13:18 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 13:18 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 13:18 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 13:18 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 13:20 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 13:20 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 13:20 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 13:20 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 14:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-10 14:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-10 14:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-10 14:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-10 13:23 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-10 13:23 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-10 13:23 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-10 13:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-10 13:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 1:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 1:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 1:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 23:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 23:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 23:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-11 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-12 7:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-12 7:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-12 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 23:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 1:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 11:08 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-11 11:08 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-11 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 18:38 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-11 18:38 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-11 18:38 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-11 18:38 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-11 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 11:08 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-11 11:08 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-10 13:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-09 12:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-09 9:34 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-08 21:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-06 14:49 Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 14:49 Raghavendra K T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D7A1AD.3050108@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.ryabinin@samsung.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.