From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yehuda@redhat.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rgw and the next dumpling release
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:10:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D8B1C1.6060106@dachary.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D3F7C5.6030701@dachary.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1837 bytes --]
Hi Yehuda,
Your backport of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a9dd4af401328e8f9071dee52470a0685ceb296b at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3645 was added to the dumpling-backports branch and the RGW suite run came back green.
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410-6-february
I should add that because of environmental instability (IMHO) I ran the suite twice. That produced at least one successful run of each job. For the record the first run is:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560#teuthology-runs-on-b5e871fe027db3b25f9129ae3e5b2326a89467c5-6-february
Do you think rgw is ready for the next dumpling point release ?
Cheers
On 06/02/2015 00:07, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Thanks !
>
> On 05/02/2015 23:59, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
>>> To: "Yehuda Sadeh" <yehuda@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 2:38:29 PM
>>> Subject: rgw and the next dumpling release
>>>
>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>
>>> The rados teuthology suite for the next dumpling release as found in
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports came back green
>>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-03_14:46:09-rgw-dumpling-backports---basic-multi/.
>>> Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>>
>>
>> We should also backport a9dd4af401328e8f9071dee52470a0685ceb296b to dumpling. I think I saw a dumpling run failing due to the lack of this one, and since we now run on environments that use apache 2.4. Looking at this commit, it's not going to be applied trivially, so I'm preparing one for dumpling now.
>>
>> Yehuda
>>
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-09 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-05 22:38 rgw and the next dumpling release Loic Dachary
2015-02-05 22:59 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
2015-02-05 23:07 ` Loic Dachary
2015-02-09 13:10 ` Loic Dachary [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D8B1C1.6060106@dachary.org \
--to=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yehuda@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.