From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@imgtec.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: "\"Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)\"" <qiwang@micron.com>,
"Andrew Bresticker" <abrestic@chromium.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"\"Frank Liu 刘群 (frankliu)\"" <frankliu@micron.com>,
"\"Melanie Zhang 张燕 (melaniezhang)\"" <melaniezhang@micron.com>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"James Hartley" <james.hartley@imgtec.com>,
"\"Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)\"" <peterpandong@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] An alternative to SPI NAND
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:32:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EB481A.8080606@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150131070204.GA3692@norris-Latitude-E6410>
Brian,
On 01/31/2015 04:02 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Unless someone else thinks they have an excellent handle on the above,
> I'll take a stab at doing this. I actually have a few patches that have
> hung around a while (with little incentive to finish them) that do parts
> of what I'm suggesting above.
Any progress with this?
You outlined the plan quite clearly, so perhaps I can help you by
putting together some patches? If you have some work-in-progress stuff,
I can even start there.
--
Ezequiel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@imgtec.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: "\"Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)\"" <peterpandong@micron.com>,
"\"Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)\"" <qiwang@micron.com>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"\"Frank Liu 刘群 (frankliu)\"" <frankliu@micron.com>,
"\"Melanie Zhang 张燕 (melaniezhang)\"" <melaniezhang@micron.com>,
"James Hartley" <james.hartley@imgtec.com>,
"Andrew Bresticker" <abrestic@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] An alternative to SPI NAND
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:32:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EB481A.8080606@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150131070204.GA3692@norris-Latitude-E6410>
Brian,
On 01/31/2015 04:02 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Unless someone else thinks they have an excellent handle on the above,
> I'll take a stab at doing this. I actually have a few patches that have
> hung around a while (with little incentive to finish them) that do parts
> of what I'm suggesting above.
Any progress with this?
You outlined the plan quite clearly, so perhaps I can help you by
putting together some patches? If you have some work-in-progress stuff,
I can even start there.
--
Ezequiel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-23 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 0:47 [PATCH 0/3] An alternative to SPI NAND Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
2015-01-08 0:47 ` Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
2015-01-08 1:03 ` Brian Norris
2015-01-08 1:03 ` Brian Norris
2015-01-08 2:45 ` Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)
2015-01-08 2:45 ` Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)
2015-01-08 3:27 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-08 3:27 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-12 15:10 ` Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)
2015-01-12 15:10 ` Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)
2015-01-20 10:35 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-20 10:35 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-21 2:11 ` Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)
2015-01-21 2:11 ` Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)
2015-01-29 18:03 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-29 18:03 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-30 0:57 ` Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
2015-01-30 0:57 ` Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
2015-01-30 11:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-30 11:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-31 7:02 ` Brian Norris
2015-01-31 7:02 ` Brian Norris
2015-02-02 1:53 ` Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
2015-02-02 1:53 ` Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
2015-02-23 15:32 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2015-02-23 15:32 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-02-24 3:54 ` Brian Norris
2015-02-24 3:54 ` Brian Norris
2015-02-26 18:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-02-26 18:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-20 6:15 ` Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
2015-01-20 6:15 ` Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54EB481A.8080606@imgtec.com \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@imgtec.com \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=frankliu@micron.com \
--cc=james.hartley@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=melaniezhang@micron.com \
--cc=peterpandong@micron.com \
--cc=qiwang@micron.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.