* [PATCH] perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able
@ 2015-02-18 17:45 David Ahern
2015-02-23 16:49 ` David Ahern
2015-03-27 11:46 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able() tip-bot for David Ahern
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2015-02-18 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: David Ahern, Peter Zijlstra
perf_pmu_disable is called before pmu->add and perf_pmu_enable is called
afterwards. No need to call these inside of x86_pmu_add as well.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index b71a7f86d68a..2d1675816bef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1033,7 +1033,6 @@ static int x86_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
hwc = &event->hw;
- perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
n0 = cpuc->n_events;
ret = n = collect_events(cpuc, event, false);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -1071,7 +1070,6 @@ static int x86_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
ret = 0;
out:
- perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
return ret;
}
--
1.9.3 (Apple Git-50)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able
2015-02-18 17:45 [PATCH] perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able David Ahern
@ 2015-02-23 16:49 ` David Ahern
2015-02-23 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-27 11:46 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able() tip-bot for David Ahern
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2015-02-23 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi Peter:
On 2/18/15 10:45 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> perf_pmu_disable is called before pmu->add and perf_pmu_enable is called
> afterwards. No need to call these inside of x86_pmu_add as well.
Does this make sense or did I miss something about the
pmu_enable/disable functions?
David
>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index b71a7f86d68a..2d1675816bef 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -1033,7 +1033,6 @@ static int x86_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>
> hwc = &event->hw;
>
> - perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
> n0 = cpuc->n_events;
> ret = n = collect_events(cpuc, event, false);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1071,7 +1070,6 @@ static int x86_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>
> ret = 0;
> out:
> - perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
> return ret;
> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able
2015-02-23 16:49 ` David Ahern
@ 2015-02-23 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2015-02-23 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ahern; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:49:35AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> Hi Peter:
>
> On 2/18/15 10:45 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> >perf_pmu_disable is called before pmu->add and perf_pmu_enable is called
> >afterwards. No need to call these inside of x86_pmu_add as well.
>
> Does this make sense or did I miss something about the pmu_enable/disable
> functions?
No, I think you're right. Applied, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able()
2015-02-18 17:45 [PATCH] perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able David Ahern
2015-02-23 16:49 ` David Ahern
@ 2015-03-27 11:46 ` tip-bot for David Ahern
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for David Ahern @ 2015-03-27 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: hpa, linux-kernel, tglx, dsahern, mingo, peterz
Commit-ID: 9332d250b4b4f67c633894b311e022e3cf943bd5
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/9332d250b4b4f67c633894b311e022e3cf943bd5
Author: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:45:43 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:49:44 +0100
perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able()
perf_pmu_disable() is called before pmu->add() and perf_pmu_enable() is called
afterwards. No need to call these inside of x86_pmu_add() as well.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424281543-67335-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index ec6e982..ac41b3a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1044,7 +1044,6 @@ static int x86_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
hwc = &event->hw;
- perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
n0 = cpuc->n_events;
ret = n = collect_events(cpuc, event, false);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -1082,7 +1081,6 @@ done_collect:
ret = 0;
out:
- perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
return ret;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-27 11:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-18 17:45 [PATCH] perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able David Ahern
2015-02-23 16:49 ` David Ahern
2015-02-23 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-27 11:46 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Remove redundant calls to perf_pmu_{dis|en}able() tip-bot for David Ahern
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.