From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, carnold@suse.com, jcody@redhat.com,
stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] block/vpc: simplify vpc_read
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:29:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EB7177.9040801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424701661-21241-3-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de>
On 2015-02-23 at 09:27, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
> ---
> block/vpc.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/vpc.c b/block/vpc.c
> index 326c2bb..4e5ba85 100644
> --- a/block/vpc.c
> +++ b/block/vpc.c
> @@ -497,40 +497,70 @@ static int vpc_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverInfo *bdi)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int vpc_read(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> - uint8_t *buf, int nb_sectors)
> +static int64_t coroutine_fn vpc_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
> + int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
How about just putting the function header here? If you really have to
move vpc_co_get_block_status() up, I'd rather like it to be in a
separate patch.
Second, while apparently vpc_read() is actually called in a coroutine,
that is pretty hard to know. Most importantly, it's not marked as a
coroutine_fn. Therefore I don't think it's a good idea to call
vpc_co_get_block_status() directly; I'd vote for either using
bdrv_get_block_status(), or moving the content of
vpc_co_get_block_status() to a non-coroutine_fn (it doesn't contain an
coroutine-related function calls, so this is fine) and then making
vpc_co_get_block_status() a wrapper around that, or just dropping this
patch.
The latter I'm proposing because I don't really see what this patch
improves. The previous vpc_read() function was pretty straightforward,
too, and I don't think it was unbearably longer.
One could argue that the coroutine_fn stuff doesn't really matter in
this situation because it doesn't actually do anything right now and
vpc_co_get_block_status() does not call any other coroutine_fn functions
in turn; however, it is a semantic contract established by
include/block/coroutine.h and as far as I remember, Stefan did
eventually want to have something to error out on compile-time if a
non-coroutine_fn function calls a coroutine_fn. I don't like breaking
this contract even if it's not bad in this specific case.
Considering you probably think bdrv_get_block_status() to be too much
overhead (it will fall down to the protocol layer on VHD_FIXED) and you
probably find making vpc_read() shorter justified (again, which I don't
necessarily), I think moving the contents of vpc_co_get_block_status()
to a non-coroutine_fn might be the best way to go.
> {
> BDRVVPCState *s = bs->opaque;
> - int ret;
> - int64_t offset;
> - int64_t sectors, sectors_per_block;
> - VHDFooter *footer = (VHDFooter *) s->footer_buf;
> + VHDFooter *footer = (VHDFooter*) s->footer_buf;
> + int64_t start, offset;
> + bool allocated;
> + int n;
>
> if (be32_to_cpu(footer->type) == VHD_FIXED) {
> - return bdrv_read(bs->file, sector_num, buf, nb_sectors);
> + *pnum = nb_sectors;
> + return BDRV_BLOCK_RAW | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA |
> + (sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
> }
> - while (nb_sectors > 0) {
> - offset = get_sector_offset(bs, sector_num, 0);
>
> - sectors_per_block = s->block_size >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> - sectors = sectors_per_block - (sector_num % sectors_per_block);
> - if (sectors > nb_sectors) {
> - sectors = nb_sectors;
> + offset = get_sector_offset(bs, sector_num, 0);
> + start = offset;
> + allocated = (offset != -1);
> + *pnum = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + /* All sectors in a block are contiguous (without using the bitmap) */
> + n = ROUND_UP(sector_num + 1, s->block_size / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)
> + - sector_num;
> + n = MIN(n, nb_sectors);
> +
> + *pnum += n;
> + sector_num += n;
> + nb_sectors -= n;
> +
> + if (allocated) {
> + return BDRV_BLOCK_DATA | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | start;
> }
> + if (nb_sectors == 0) {
> + break;
> + }
> + offset = get_sector_offset(bs, sector_num, 0);
> + } while (offset == -1);
>
> - if (offset == -1) {
> - memset(buf, 0, sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> - } else {
> - ret = bdrv_pread(bs->file, offset, buf,
> - sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> - if (ret != sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) {
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vpc_read(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> + uint8_t *buf, int nb_sectors)
> +{
> + int ret, n;
> + int64_t ret2;
> +
> + while (nb_sectors > 0) {
> + ret2 = vpc_co_get_block_status(bs, sector_num, nb_sectors, &n);
> +
Superfluous whitespace here.
> + if (ret2 & BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID) {
> + ret = bdrv_pread(bs->file, ret2 & BDRV_SECTOR_MASK, buf,
> + n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> + if (ret != n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) {
> return -1;
Please make that "return ret" (and possibly "if (ret < 0)", if you want to).
Max
> }
> + } else {
> + memset(buf, 0x00, n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> }
>
> - nb_sectors -= sectors;
> - sector_num += sectors;
> - buf += sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> + sector_num += n;
> + nb_sectors -= n;
> + buf += n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> }
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -597,48 +627,6 @@ static coroutine_fn int vpc_co_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int64_t coroutine_fn vpc_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
> - int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
> -{
> - BDRVVPCState *s = bs->opaque;
> - VHDFooter *footer = (VHDFooter*) s->footer_buf;
> - int64_t start, offset;
> - bool allocated;
> - int n;
> -
> - if (be32_to_cpu(footer->type) == VHD_FIXED) {
> - *pnum = nb_sectors;
> - return BDRV_BLOCK_RAW | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA |
> - (sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
> - }
> -
> - offset = get_sector_offset(bs, sector_num, 0);
> - start = offset;
> - allocated = (offset != -1);
> - *pnum = 0;
> -
> - do {
> - /* All sectors in a block are contiguous (without using the bitmap) */
> - n = ROUND_UP(sector_num + 1, s->block_size / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE)
> - - sector_num;
> - n = MIN(n, nb_sectors);
> -
> - *pnum += n;
> - sector_num += n;
> - nb_sectors -= n;
> -
> - if (allocated) {
> - return BDRV_BLOCK_DATA | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | start;
> - }
> - if (nb_sectors == 0) {
> - break;
> - }
> - offset = get_sector_offset(bs, sector_num, 0);
> - } while (offset == -1);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Calculates the number of cylinders, heads and sectors per cylinder
> * based on a given number of sectors. This is the algorithm described
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-23 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-23 14:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] block/vpc optimizations Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block/vpc: optimize vpc_co_get_block_status Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:08 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-24 6:41 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] block/vpc: simplify vpc_read Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:29 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2015-02-24 6:44 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-24 14:09 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] vpc: Ignore geometry for large images Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:34 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-24 6:45 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-24 14:12 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] block/vpc: make calculate_geometry spec conform Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 18:59 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-24 6:49 ` Peter Lieven
2015-02-24 14:14 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-23 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] block/vpc: rename footer->size -> footer->current_size Peter Lieven
2015-02-23 19:04 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54EB7177.9040801@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=carnold@suse.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.