* [PATCH] drm/i915/skl: Update edp 1.4 DDI translation table
@ 2015-02-21 5:40 Sonika Jindal
2015-02-24 0:12 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sonika Jindal @ 2015-02-21 5:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Updating recommended DDI translation table for edp 1.4
as per bspec update
Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index 114b729..f17cc48 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -141,16 +141,16 @@ static const struct ddi_buf_trans skl_ddi_translations_dp[] = {
/* eDP 1.4 low vswing translation parameters */
static const struct ddi_buf_trans skl_ddi_translations_edp[] = {
- { 0x00000018, 0x00000428 },
- { 0x00002016, 0x00000067 },
- { 0x00006012, 0x00000032 },
+ { 0x00000018, 0x000000a8 },
+ { 0x00002016, 0x000000ab },
+ { 0x00006012, 0x000000a2 },
{ 0x00008010, 0x00000088 },
- { 0x00000018, 0x00000067 },
- { 0x00004014, 0x00000032 },
- { 0x00006012, 0x00000098 },
- { 0x00000018, 0x00000032 },
- { 0x00005013, 0x00000098 },
- { 0x00006012, 0x0000001e },
+ { 0x00000018, 0x000000ab },
+ { 0x00004014, 0x000000a2 },
+ { 0x00006012, 0x000000a6 },
+ { 0x00000018, 0x000000a2 },
+ { 0x00005013, 0x0000009c },
+ { 0x00000018, 0x00000088 },
};
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/skl: Update edp 1.4 DDI translation table
2015-02-21 5:40 [PATCH] drm/i915/skl: Update edp 1.4 DDI translation table Sonika Jindal
@ 2015-02-24 0:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-24 4:58 ` sonika
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2015-02-24 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sonika Jindal; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:10:51AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote:
> Updating recommended DDI translation table for edp 1.4
> as per bspec update
>
> Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index 114b729..f17cc48 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -141,16 +141,16 @@ static const struct ddi_buf_trans skl_ddi_translations_dp[] = {
>
> /* eDP 1.4 low vswing translation parameters */
> static const struct ddi_buf_trans skl_ddi_translations_edp[] = {
I don't have an edp translation table at all for skl. Does this really
apply on -nightly? If not please make it clear in the cover letter what
your depencies are or just send everything in one patch series.
Thanks, Daniel
> - { 0x00000018, 0x00000428 },
> - { 0x00002016, 0x00000067 },
> - { 0x00006012, 0x00000032 },
> + { 0x00000018, 0x000000a8 },
> + { 0x00002016, 0x000000ab },
> + { 0x00006012, 0x000000a2 },
> { 0x00008010, 0x00000088 },
> - { 0x00000018, 0x00000067 },
> - { 0x00004014, 0x00000032 },
> - { 0x00006012, 0x00000098 },
> - { 0x00000018, 0x00000032 },
> - { 0x00005013, 0x00000098 },
> - { 0x00006012, 0x0000001e },
> + { 0x00000018, 0x000000ab },
> + { 0x00004014, 0x000000a2 },
> + { 0x00006012, 0x000000a6 },
> + { 0x00000018, 0x000000a2 },
> + { 0x00005013, 0x0000009c },
> + { 0x00000018, 0x00000088 },
> };
>
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/skl: Update edp 1.4 DDI translation table
2015-02-24 0:12 ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2015-02-24 4:58 ` sonika
2015-02-24 10:44 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: sonika @ 2015-02-24 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tuesday 24 February 2015 05:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:10:51AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote:
>> Updating recommended DDI translation table for edp 1.4
>> as per bspec update
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> index 114b729..f17cc48 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> @@ -141,16 +141,16 @@ static const struct ddi_buf_trans skl_ddi_translations_dp[] = {
>>
>> /* eDP 1.4 low vswing translation parameters */
>> static const struct ddi_buf_trans skl_ddi_translations_edp[] = {
> I don't have an edp translation table at all for skl. Does this really
> apply on -nightly? If not please make it clear in the cover letter what
> your depencies are or just send everything in one patch series.
>
> Thanks, Daniel
Hi Daniel,
Yes my bad in missing that info. This patch is dependent on
"drm/i915/skl: Add support for edp1.4 low vswing"
which is merged on -internal. Do I need to send out those rebased
patches for -nightly?
Regards,
Sonika
>> - { 0x00000018, 0x00000428 },
>> - { 0x00002016, 0x00000067 },
>> - { 0x00006012, 0x00000032 },
>> + { 0x00000018, 0x000000a8 },
>> + { 0x00002016, 0x000000ab },
>> + { 0x00006012, 0x000000a2 },
>> { 0x00008010, 0x00000088 },
>> - { 0x00000018, 0x00000067 },
>> - { 0x00004014, 0x00000032 },
>> - { 0x00006012, 0x00000098 },
>> - { 0x00000018, 0x00000032 },
>> - { 0x00005013, 0x00000098 },
>> - { 0x00006012, 0x0000001e },
>> + { 0x00000018, 0x000000ab },
>> + { 0x00004014, 0x000000a2 },
>> + { 0x00006012, 0x000000a6 },
>> + { 0x00000018, 0x000000a2 },
>> + { 0x00005013, 0x0000009c },
>> + { 0x00000018, 0x00000088 },
>> };
>>
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/skl: Update edp 1.4 DDI translation table
2015-02-24 4:58 ` sonika
@ 2015-02-24 10:44 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2015-02-24 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sonika; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:28:24AM +0530, sonika wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 24 February 2015 05:42 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:10:51AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote:
> >>Updating recommended DDI translation table for edp 1.4
> >>as per bspec update
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
> >>Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
> >>---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> >>index 114b729..f17cc48 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> >>@@ -141,16 +141,16 @@ static const struct ddi_buf_trans skl_ddi_translations_dp[] = {
> >> /* eDP 1.4 low vswing translation parameters */
> >> static const struct ddi_buf_trans skl_ddi_translations_edp[] = {
> >I don't have an edp translation table at all for skl. Does this really
> >apply on -nightly? If not please make it clear in the cover letter what
> >your depencies are or just send everything in one patch series.
> >
> >Thanks, Daniel
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Yes my bad in missing that info. This patch is dependent on "drm/i915/skl:
> Add support for edp1.4 low vswing"
> which is merged on -internal. Do I need to send out those rebased patches
> for -nightly?
Yes, when submitting patches to the public mailing list please make sure
that they apply on the public drm-intel-nightly branch. If needed include
any other depencies in your series or rebase around missing bits that are
still embargoed.
Since the original patch is -internal too you probably can squash this
fixup into the patch with added the edp table originally.
Cheers, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-24 10:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-21 5:40 [PATCH] drm/i915/skl: Update edp 1.4 DDI translation table Sonika Jindal
2015-02-24 0:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-24 4:58 ` sonika
2015-02-24 10:44 ` Daniel Vetter
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.