All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, robert.moore@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devel@acpica.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] ACPI: clear up warnings on use of printk reported by checkpatch.pl
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:56:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EE36E4.5070404@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54EDC64D.8040301@linaro.org>

On 02/25/2015 05:55 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年02月25日 08:36, al.stone@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>>
>> In preparation for later splitting out some of the arch-dependent code from
>> osl.c, clear up all the warnings reported by checkpatch.pl where pr_* should
>> be used instead of printk(KERN_* ...).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/osl.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> index 1dc3a3b..865317c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static u32 acpi_osi_handler(acpi_string interface, u32
>> supported)
>>   {
>>       if (!strcmp("Linux", interface)) {
>>
>> -        printk_once(KERN_NOTICE FW_BUG PREFIX
>> +        pr_notice_once(FW_BUG PREFIX
> 
> I think you can use pr_fmt() and then remove all the PREFIX in
> this patch, just
> 
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: " fmt
> 
> in top of this file before all #includes.
> 
> Thanks
> Hanjun

Argh.  Yup, you're right.  That was an oversight on my part.
Fixed in next version.

-- 
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Linaro Enterprise Group
al.stone@linaro.org
-----------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, robert.moore@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devel@acpica.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] ACPI: clear up warnings on use of printk reported by checkpatch.pl
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:56:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EE36E4.5070404@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54EDC64D.8040301@linaro.org>

On 02/25/2015 05:55 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年02月25日 08:36, al.stone@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>>
>> In preparation for later splitting out some of the arch-dependent code from
>> osl.c, clear up all the warnings reported by checkpatch.pl where pr_* should
>> be used instead of printk(KERN_* ...).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/osl.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> index 1dc3a3b..865317c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static u32 acpi_osi_handler(acpi_string interface, u32
>> supported)
>>   {
>>       if (!strcmp("Linux", interface)) {
>>
>> -        printk_once(KERN_NOTICE FW_BUG PREFIX
>> +        pr_notice_once(FW_BUG PREFIX
> 
> I think you can use pr_fmt() and then remove all the PREFIX in
> this patch, just
> 
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: " fmt
> 
> in top of this file before all #includes.
> 
> Thanks
> Hanjun

Argh.  Yup, you're right.  That was an oversight on my part.
Fixed in next version.

-- 
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Linaro Enterprise Group
al.stone@linaro.org
-----------------------------------

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: al.stone@linaro.org (Al Stone)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/9] ACPI: clear up warnings on use of printk reported by checkpatch.pl
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:56:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EE36E4.5070404@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54EDC64D.8040301@linaro.org>

On 02/25/2015 05:55 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015?02?25? 08:36, al.stone at linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>>
>> In preparation for later splitting out some of the arch-dependent code from
>> osl.c, clear up all the warnings reported by checkpatch.pl where pr_* should
>> be used instead of printk(KERN_* ...).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/osl.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> index 1dc3a3b..865317c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static u32 acpi_osi_handler(acpi_string interface, u32
>> supported)
>>   {
>>       if (!strcmp("Linux", interface)) {
>>
>> -        printk_once(KERN_NOTICE FW_BUG PREFIX
>> +        pr_notice_once(FW_BUG PREFIX
> 
> I think you can use pr_fmt() and then remove all the PREFIX in
> this patch, just
> 
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: " fmt
> 
> in top of this file before all #includes.
> 
> Thanks
> Hanjun

Argh.  Yup, you're right.  That was an oversight on my part.
Fixed in next version.

-- 
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Linaro Enterprise Group
al.stone at linaro.org
-----------------------------------

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, robert.moore@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devel@acpica.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] ACPI: clear up warnings on use of printk reported by checkpatch.pl
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:56:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EE36E4.5070404@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54EDC64D.8040301@linaro.org>

On 02/25/2015 05:55 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年02月25日 08:36, al.stone@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>>
>> In preparation for later splitting out some of the arch-dependent code from
>> osl.c, clear up all the warnings reported by checkpatch.pl where pr_* should
>> be used instead of printk(KERN_* ...).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/osl.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> index 1dc3a3b..865317c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
>> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static u32 acpi_osi_handler(acpi_string interface, u32
>> supported)
>>   {
>>       if (!strcmp("Linux", interface)) {
>>
>> -        printk_once(KERN_NOTICE FW_BUG PREFIX
>> +        pr_notice_once(FW_BUG PREFIX
> 
> I think you can use pr_fmt() and then remove all the PREFIX in
> this patch, just
> 
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: " fmt
> 
> in top of this file before all #includes.
> 
> Thanks
> Hanjun

Argh.  Yup, you're right.  That was an oversight on my part.
Fixed in next version.

-- 
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Linaro Enterprise Group
al.stone@linaro.org
-----------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-25 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-25  0:36 [PATCH v3 0/9] Start deprecating _OSI on new architectures al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36 ` al.stone at linaro.org
2015-02-25  0:36 ` al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] ACPI: fix all errors reported by cleanpatch.pl in osl.c al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone at linaro.org
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone
2015-02-25 12:47   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 12:47     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 12:47     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 12:47     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-04 22:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:04     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:04     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:56     ` Al Stone
2015-03-04 23:56       ` [Devel] " Al Stone
2015-03-04 23:56       ` Al Stone
2015-03-04 23:56       ` Al Stone
2015-03-05  0:25       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-05  0:25         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-05  0:25         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-05  0:06         ` Al Stone
2015-03-05  0:06           ` [Devel] " Al Stone
2015-03-05  0:06           ` Al Stone
2015-03-05  0:06           ` Al Stone
2015-02-25  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] ACPI: clear up warnings on use of printk reported by checkpatch.pl al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone at linaro.org
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone
2015-02-25 12:55   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 12:55     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 12:55     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 12:55     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 20:56     ` Al Stone [this message]
2015-02-25 20:56       ` Al Stone
2015-02-25 20:56       ` Al Stone
2015-02-25 20:56       ` Al Stone
2015-02-25  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] ACPI: clean up checkpatch warnings for various bits of syntax al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone at linaro.org
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone
2015-02-25 12:59   ` [Linaro-acpi] " Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 12:59     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 12:59     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 12:59     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] ACPI: clean up checkpatch warnings for items with possible semantic value al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone at linaro.org
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone
2015-02-25 13:08   ` [Linaro-acpi] " Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 13:08     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 13:08     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 13:08     ` [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v3 4/9] ACPI: clean up checkpatch warnings for items with possible semantic Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 20:57     ` [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v3 4/9] ACPI: clean up checkpatch warnings for items with possible semantic value Al Stone
2015-02-25 20:57       ` Al Stone
2015-02-25 20:57       ` Al Stone
2015-02-25 20:57       ` [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v3 4/9] ACPI: clean up checkpatch warnings for items with possible semantic Al Stone
2015-02-25  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] ACPI: move acpi_os_handler() so it can be made arch-dependent later al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone at linaro.org
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone
2015-02-25 13:47   ` [Linaro-acpi] " Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 13:47     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 13:47     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] ACPI: move _OSI support functions to allow arch-dependent implementation al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone at linaro.org
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone
2015-03-04 22:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:09     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:09     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-25  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] ACPI: enable arch-specific compilation for _OSI and the blacklist al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone at linaro.org
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone
2015-03-04 22:48   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-25  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] ACPI: arm64: use an arch-specific ACPI _OSI method and ACPI blacklist al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone at linaro.org
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone
2015-03-02 17:29   ` Will Deacon
2015-03-02 17:29     ` Will Deacon
2015-03-02 17:29     ` Will Deacon
2015-03-02 19:00     ` Al Stone
2015-03-02 19:00       ` Al Stone
2015-03-02 19:00       ` Al Stone
2015-03-04 22:51       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:14         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:14         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-05 10:17         ` Will Deacon
2015-03-05 10:17           ` Will Deacon
2015-03-05 10:17           ` Will Deacon
2015-03-05 12:56           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-05 12:56             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-05 12:56             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 22:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:16     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:16     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-25  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] ACPI: arm64: use "Linux" as ACPI_OS_NAME for _OS on arm64 al.stone
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone at linaro.org
2015-02-25  0:36   ` al.stone
2015-03-04 22:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:17     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:17     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54EE36E4.5070404@linaro.org \
    --to=al.stone@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.