From: wenzong fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
To: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>,
<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][meta-oe] samba: disable services for sysvinit
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:26:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F7B0BC.7010203@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F6E640.1010903@opendreambox.org>
On 03/04/2015 07:02 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 04.03.2015 10:43, wenzong fan wrote:
>> On 03/04/2015 05:12 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> Dear Wenzong Fan,
>>>
>>> On 04.03.2015 07:18, wenzong.fan@windriver.com wrote:
>>>> From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
>>>>
>>>> The smb, nmb, winbind services have been disabled for systemd system
>>>> by default, disable them for sysvinit as well.
>>>
>>> why would anybody install these services without the desire for using
>>> them? Did the patch disabling them for systemd get merged by mistake? I
>>> remember Paul objecting to it.
>>
>> The samba is not a common service that required by system, especially in
>> some security environment, it should be configured correctly first -
>> This is why I incline to disable it by default.
>
> This doesn't convince me, as the line you're drawing between samba and
> other services seems to be chosen arbitrarily.
>
> "git grep INITSCRIPT_PARAMS.*disable" shows no results in both
> openembedded-core and meta-openembedded (dizzy). So samba will be the
> first and only service that's disabled by default and requires manual
> intervention by the user? Why don't you ship a safe configuration instead?
>
> As Paul stated, the distro is responsible for correct configuration.
> IMHO there's no reason to deviate from common behaviour just because
> samba seems to be less safe than any other network service in your view.
>
Ok, thanks for your advises, I agree with you.
Please maintainer ignore my patch.
>> Yes, it did - this may give me some hints that it should be disabled ...
>
> Unfortunately I don't understand what you're referring to here.
Sorry for the confusion, it answered you second question about if "the
patch disabling them for systemd get merged by mistake?".
Yes, the patch for systemd has been merged - It gives me hint that it's
a proper behavior for samba, but looks it isn't ...
Please refer to the commit: 20a624928c030fa13d8b7d45b4f4d7e1ac624f60
It should be reverted now!
Thanks
Wenzong
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-05 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-04 6:18 [PATCH][meta-oe] samba: disable services for sysvinit wenzong.fan
2015-03-04 9:12 ` Andreas Oberritter
2015-03-04 9:43 ` wenzong fan
2015-03-04 11:02 ` Andreas Oberritter
2015-03-05 1:26 ` wenzong fan [this message]
2015-03-29 14:35 ` Andreas Oberritter
2015-03-29 22:40 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F7B0BC.7010203@windriver.com \
--to=wenzong.fan@windriver.com \
--cc=obi@opendreambox.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.