Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/6] Add CPUIdle support for Renesas SoCs

[Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>]

On 03/09/2015 04:21 PM, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06 2015 at 02:38 -0700, keita kobayashi wrote:
>> Hi Daniel

[ ... ]

>>>
>>> Hi Keita,
>>>
>>> the platform approach to pass private data from the arch specific to
>>> the cpuidle driver no longer accepted. Unfortunately, there is no
>>> alternate solution upstream.
>>>
>>> But hopefully, there is a patchset [1] submitted for upstreaming
>>> which unify arm32/64 into a single generic cpuidle driver and use the
>>> DT to define the idle functions to be used.
>>>
>>> I suggest you have a look at this patchset if it can fit your need.
>>>
>>>   -- Daniel
>>>
>>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/3/271
>>
>> Thank you for information.
>> I will take a look at the patch series.
>
> Hi Kieta,
>
> Please also have a look at the v15 of the cpuidle support for QCOM SoC.
> Sent just now.  It is based on [1].

Lina's patchset is available at:

https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree@vger.kernel.org/msg64700.html

Thanks
   -- Daniel

-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog