From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: "kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2 CPU Conformance Issue in KVM/x86
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:47:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FECBAD.9060809@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54FDF93F.7080502@gmail.com>
On 09/03/2015 20:49, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>> Yes, and it checked that MAXPHYADDR != 52 before. If you want to set
>> only one bit, making that bit 51 makes sense anyway for simplicity, so
>> it is still 99.9% academic. Once processors appear with MAXPHYADDR =
>> 52, the remaining 0.1% will become more relevant.
>>
>> The current limit is IIRC 46 or 48 (on Haswell Xeons).
>
> It will be interesting to have processors with 52 bits of physical
> address and 48 bits of virtual address. HIGHMEM for x86_64? Or 5-level
> page tables?
I wonder why Intel chose exactly 52... HIGHMEM seems more likely than
5-level page tables. Certainly it wouldn't need hacks like Ingo's 4G-4G.
> 50 bits == 1 PiB. That's quite an amount of RAM.
Not that 64 TiB is not "quite an amount of RAM". :)
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-03 8:34 2 CPU Conformance Issue in KVM/x86 Nadav Amit
2015-03-03 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-03 10:18 ` Nadav Amit
2015-03-03 14:31 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-03-09 17:08 ` Avi Kivity
2015-03-09 17:51 ` Nadav Amit
2015-03-09 18:23 ` Avi Kivity
2015-03-09 19:07 ` Nadav Amit
2015-03-09 19:19 ` Avi Kivity
2015-03-09 19:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-09 19:49 ` Avi Kivity
2015-03-10 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-03-10 20:38 ` Avi Kivity
2015-03-09 19:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-09 19:50 ` Avi Kivity
2015-03-10 10:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54FECBAD.9060809@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.