From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Feng Kan <fkan-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
<psawargaonkar-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"patches-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org"
<patches-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"kvmarm-FPEHb7Xf0XXUo1n7N8X6UoWGPAHP3yOg@public.gmane.org"
<kvmarm-FPEHb7Xf0XXUo1n7N8X6UoWGPAHP3yOg@public.gmane.org>,
"arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org"
<arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
"christoffer.dall-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<christoffer.dall-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"jcm-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org"
<jcm-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Tushar Jagad <tjagad-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: Fix GIC reg sizes for APM X-Gene
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:17:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550086B9.4010001@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL85gmDVfop1_roHyLTRzFY3BahzTWs7nwbpmZD7emFKcFHyLg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 11/03/15 17:57, Feng Kan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> On 11/03/15 17:19, Feng Kan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> On 27/01/15 07:03, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>>>>> In APM X-Gene, GIC register space is 64K aligned while the sizes mentioned
>>>>> in the dt are 4K aligned. This breaks KVM when kernel is built with 64K page
>>>>> size due to size alignment checking in vgic driver for VCPU Control and
>>>>> VCPU register.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch corrects the sizes to be inline with the hardware spec.
>>>>
>>>> This patch may be correct, but it is useless. The firmware on my APM
>>>> system (some version of u-boot) repaints the DT at boot time, negating
>>>> the effect of this patch.
>>> We have updated u-boot to reflect this change. I can supply you with a updated
>>> image if you wish.
>>
>> That would be useful, thanks.
>>
>> But more importantly, why bother upstreaming your DT into the kernel
>> tree if your firmware is going to overwrite whatever we provide?
> We did tried to submit a version upstream but was rejected.
>
>>
>> Either the firmware let the user provide its own DT (and doesn't touch
>> it other than to change the CPU enable method, insert a /memreserve/ or
>> similar things), or the firmware always provide its own DT, and doesn't
>> let the user provide its own. Corrupting the user DT is a disaster, as
>> we just found.
> Yes, the intent of the change is listed in the link below. It is not a
> justification by any means,
> just the effects of things appearing in layers.
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-September/288574.html
Yeah. This is as wrong as it can possibly be. Oh well...
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: Fix GIC reg sizes for APM X-Gene
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:17:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550086B9.4010001@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL85gmDVfop1_roHyLTRzFY3BahzTWs7nwbpmZD7emFKcFHyLg@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/03/15 17:57, Feng Kan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 11/03/15 17:19, Feng Kan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> On 27/01/15 07:03, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
>>>>> In APM X-Gene, GIC register space is 64K aligned while the sizes mentioned
>>>>> in the dt are 4K aligned. This breaks KVM when kernel is built with 64K page
>>>>> size due to size alignment checking in vgic driver for VCPU Control and
>>>>> VCPU register.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch corrects the sizes to be inline with the hardware spec.
>>>>
>>>> This patch may be correct, but it is useless. The firmware on my APM
>>>> system (some version of u-boot) repaints the DT at boot time, negating
>>>> the effect of this patch.
>>> We have updated u-boot to reflect this change. I can supply you with a updated
>>> image if you wish.
>>
>> That would be useful, thanks.
>>
>> But more importantly, why bother upstreaming your DT into the kernel
>> tree if your firmware is going to overwrite whatever we provide?
> We did tried to submit a version upstream but was rejected.
>
>>
>> Either the firmware let the user provide its own DT (and doesn't touch
>> it other than to change the CPU enable method, insert a /memreserve/ or
>> similar things), or the firmware always provide its own DT, and doesn't
>> let the user provide its own. Corrupting the user DT is a disaster, as
>> we just found.
> Yes, the intent of the change is listed in the link below. It is not a
> justification by any means,
> just the effects of things appearing in layers.
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-September/288574.html
Yeah. This is as wrong as it can possibly be. Oh well...
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-11 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-27 7:03 [PATCH] arm64: dts: Fix GIC reg sizes for APM X-Gene Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-01-27 7:03 ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-01-27 9:32 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-27 9:32 ` Jon Masters
2015-02-11 4:09 ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-02-11 4:09 ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-02-19 15:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-02-19 15:51 ` Christoffer Dall
[not found] ` <1422342206-4750-1-git-send-email-psawargaonkar-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-19 18:23 ` Rob Herring
2015-02-19 18:23 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqJQcuX2cp50oHod-QAbhdMg48TaRP+gLGEO2kbFnQ3B+A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-19 19:03 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-02-19 19:03 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-02-21 21:56 ` Rob Herring
2015-02-21 21:56 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqLcBOC+AnVe7oATjg2g6Fz2vqwacu8QzS4tXMaxxOP_Xg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-21 23:58 ` Peter Maydell
2015-02-21 23:58 ` Peter Maydell
2015-02-23 12:07 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-02-23 12:07 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-02-23 12:24 ` Jon Masters
2015-02-23 12:24 ` Jon Masters
2015-02-23 16:39 ` Rob Herring
2015-02-23 16:39 ` Rob Herring
2015-02-24 6:34 ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-02-24 6:34 ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
[not found] ` <CANFfpkQF-8Kzq-UoP=xLpkTafGn6ScyiEb6oCs-Lxygb+ummLA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-24 14:30 ` Rob Herring
2015-02-24 14:30 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqLs4HdT6N=Vb4s--x3ugXKbWYQ5R2WGbiWFhhnYxnK-xw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-27 3:57 ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-02-27 3:57 ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-03-19 18:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-19 18:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-11 14:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-11 14:53 ` Marc Zyngier
[not found] ` <550056FD.8060804-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-11 17:19 ` Feng Kan
2015-03-11 17:19 ` Feng Kan
[not found] ` <CAL85gmCuB4LfNp+6B8cL9+emFqWPM6W9gevTzibyaAzL+7jVdg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-11 17:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-11 17:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-11 17:57 ` Feng Kan
2015-03-11 17:57 ` Feng Kan
[not found] ` <CAL85gmDVfop1_roHyLTRzFY3BahzTWs7nwbpmZD7emFKcFHyLg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-11 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-03-11 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
[not found] ` <550086B9.4010001-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-12 3:52 ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-03-12 3:52 ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
[not found] ` <CANFfpkQ1QyWEGwwQx1g1By=uXvctJjF8AOO+uA5CFUgO4v9DFg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-12 9:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-12 9:25 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=550086B9.4010001@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=christoffer.dall-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fkan-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jcm-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvmarm-FPEHb7Xf0XXUo1n7N8X6UoWGPAHP3yOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=patches-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org \
--cc=psawargaonkar-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tjagad-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.