All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Wu Fengguang
	<fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:36:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5500C352.2060104@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426107294-21551-1-git-send-email-mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>

On 03/11/2015 04:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The second patch is the first step in the transition plan. It changes
> the default but it is NOT an upstream material. It is aimed for brave
> testers who can cope with failures. I have talked to Andrew and he
> was willing to keep that patch in mmotm tree. It would be even better
> to have this in linux-next because the testing coverage would be even
> bigger. Dave Chinner has also shown an interest to integrate this into
> his xfstest farm. It would be great if Fenguang could add it into the
> zero testing project too (if the pushing the patch into linux-next
> would be too controversial).

Stuff in mmotm automatically end up in linux-next.


Thanks,
Sasha

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:36:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5500C352.2060104@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426107294-21551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>

On 03/11/2015 04:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The second patch is the first step in the transition plan. It changes
> the default but it is NOT an upstream material. It is aimed for brave
> testers who can cope with failures. I have talked to Andrew and he
> was willing to keep that patch in mmotm tree. It would be even better
> to have this in linux-next because the testing coverage would be even
> bigger. Dave Chinner has also shown an interest to integrate this into
> his xfstest farm. It would be great if Fenguang could add it into the
> zero testing project too (if the pushing the patch into linux-next
> would be too controversial).

Stuff in mmotm automatically end up in linux-next.


Thanks,
Sasha

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:36:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5500C352.2060104@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426107294-21551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>

On 03/11/2015 04:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The second patch is the first step in the transition plan. It changes
> the default but it is NOT an upstream material. It is aimed for brave
> testers who can cope with failures. I have talked to Andrew and he
> was willing to keep that patch in mmotm tree. It would be even better
> to have this in linux-next because the testing coverage would be even
> bigger. Dave Chinner has also shown an interest to integrate this into
> his xfstest farm. It would be great if Fenguang could add it into the
> zero testing project too (if the pushing the patch into linux-next
> would be too controversial).

Stuff in mmotm automatically end up in linux-next.


Thanks,
Sasha

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-11 20:54 [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations Michal Hocko
2015-03-11 20:54 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-11 20:54 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-11 20:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmotm: Enable small allocation to fail Michal Hocko
2015-03-11 20:54   ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-11 20:54   ` Michal Hocko
     [not found] ` <1426107294-21551-1-git-send-email-mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-11 20:54   ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: Allow small allocations " Michal Hocko
2015-03-11 20:54     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-11 20:54     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-12 12:54     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-12 12:54       ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-12 13:12       ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-12 13:12         ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-15  5:43     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-15  5:43       ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-15 12:13       ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-15 12:13         ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-15 13:06         ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-15 13:06           ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-16  7:46           ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Michal Hocko
2015-03-16  7:46             ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-16 21:11             ` Johannes Weiner
2015-03-16 21:11               ` Johannes Weiner
2015-03-17 10:25               ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-17 10:25                 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-17 13:29                 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-03-17 13:29                   ` Johannes Weiner
2015-03-17 14:17                   ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-17 14:17                     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-17 17:26                     ` Johannes Weiner
2015-03-17 17:26                       ` Johannes Weiner
2015-03-17 19:41                       ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-17 19:41                         ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18  9:10                         ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-03-18  9:10                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-03-18 12:04                           ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 12:04                             ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 12:36                           ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-18 12:36                             ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-18 11:35                         ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-18 11:35                           ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-17 11:13             ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-17 11:13               ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-17 13:15               ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-17 13:15                 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 11:33                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-18 11:33                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-18 12:23                   ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-18 12:23                     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-19 11:03                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-19 11:03                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-11 22:36   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2015-03-11 22:36     ` [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations Sasha Levin
2015-03-11 22:36     ` Sasha Levin
2015-03-16 22:38   ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-16 22:38     ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-16 22:38     ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-17  9:07     ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-17  9:07       ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-17 14:06       ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-03-17 14:06         ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-04-02 11:53         ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-04-02 11:53           ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5500C352.2060104@oracle.com \
    --to=sasha.levin-qhclzuegtsvqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.