From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lina.iyer@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:26:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55035623.8010002@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150313182908.GU30671@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 03/13/2015 07:29 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:25:34PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> do you agree with this patchset ?
>
> In principle yes, apart from some function naming and I'm waiting for
> Lorenzo's ack as well. Do you plan to upstream this directly via your
> tree? If yes, I'll look in more detail and give some acks.
If you don't care, I would like to upstream via my tree because there is
a couple of operations (like sharing a branch) I would like to monitor
to let people build their driver on top of it: renesas and qcom.
Qcom's cpuidle driver is already implemented and waits for this patchset
to be upstream (the patchset has been around long enough). And I believe
the Renesas driver will be reworked to use it also.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:26:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55035623.8010002@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150313182908.GU30671@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 03/13/2015 07:29 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:25:34PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> do you agree with this patchset ?
>
> In principle yes, apart from some function naming and I'm waiting for
> Lorenzo's ack as well. Do you plan to upstream this directly via your
> tree? If yes, I'll look in more detail and give some acks.
If you don't care, I would like to upstream via my tree because there is
a couple of operations (like sharing a branch) I would like to monitor
to let people build their driver on top of it: renesas and qcom.
Qcom's cpuidle driver is already implemented and waits for this patchset
to be upstream (the patchset has been around long enough). And I believe
the Renesas driver will be reworked to use it also.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-13 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-03 12:29 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: cpuidle: Remove duplicate header inclusion Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 17:54 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-13 17:54 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: cpuidle: Add a cpuidle ops structure to be used for DT Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-16 18:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-16 18:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-17 11:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-17 11:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-16 22:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-16 22:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-17 11:29 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-17 11:29 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-18 1:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-18 1:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-18 8:13 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-18 8:13 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-20 17:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-20 17:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM64: cpuidle: Replace cpu_suspend by the common ARM/ARM64 function Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 18:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-13 18:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-13 21:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 21:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM64: cpuidle: Remove arm64 reference Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <1425385777-14766-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM64: cpuidle: Rename cpu_init_idle to a common function name Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <1425385777-14766-5-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-13 18:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-13 18:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-13 18:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-14 11:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-14 11:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-15 16:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-15 16:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-20 16:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-20 16:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-20 16:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-20 17:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-20 17:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: cpuidle: Enable the ARM64 driver for both ARM32/ARM64 Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-12 14:25 ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-12 14:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-12 14:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 18:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-13 18:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-13 21:26 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2015-03-13 21:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 20:51 ` Rob Herring
2015-03-13 20:51 ` Rob Herring
2015-03-13 21:31 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 21:31 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-15 16:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-15 16:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-13 17:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-13 17:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-13 17:08 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 17:08 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55035623.8010002@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.