Re: [PATCH V5] Allow compaction of unevictable pages

[Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>]

On 03/13/2015 07:18 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Eric B Munson wrote:
> 
>>>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>>>> @@ -1046,6 +1046,8 @@ typedef enum {
>>>>  	ISOLATE_SUCCESS,	/* Pages isolated, migrate */
>>>>  } isolate_migrate_t;
>>>>  
>>>> +int sysctl_compact_unevictable;
>>>> +
>>>>  /*
>>>>   * Isolate all pages that can be migrated from the first suitable block,
>>>>   * starting at the block pointed to by the migrate scanner pfn within
>>>
>>> I suspect that the use cases where users absolutely do not want
>>> unevictable pages migrated are special cases, and it may make
>>> sense to enable sysctl_compact_unevictable by default.
>>
>> Given that sysctl_compact_unevictable=0 is the way the kernel behaves
>> now and the push back against always enabling compaction on unevictable
>> pages, I left the default to be the behavior as it is today.  I agree
>> that this is likely the minority case, but I'd really like Peter Z or
>> someone else from real time to say that they are okay with the default
>> changing.
>>
> 
> It would be really disappointing to not enable this by default for !rt 
> kernels.  We haven't migrated mlocked pages in the past by way of memory 
> compaction because it can theoretically result in consistent minor page 
> faults, but I haven't yet heard a !rt objection to enabling this.
> 
> If the rt patchset is going to carry a patch to disable this

It does not have to carry a patch to disable something that can be
disabled at run time.

The smaller the realtime patchset has to be, the better.

-- 
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>