All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf-G/eBtMaohhA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] bpf: allow extended BPF programs access skb fields
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 02:46:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550392F7.9040308@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426273064-4837-2-git-send-email-ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

On 03/13/2015 07:57 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> introduce user accessible mirror of in-kernel 'struct sk_buff':
> struct __sk_buff {
>      __u32 len;
>      __u32 pkt_type;
>      __u32 mark;
>      __u32 queue_mapping;
> };
>
> bpf programs can do:
>
> int bpf_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> {
>      __u32 var = skb->pkt_type;
>
> which will be compiled to bpf assembler as:
>
> dst_reg = *(u32 *)(src_reg + 4) // 4 == offsetof(struct __sk_buff, pkt_type)
>
> bpf verifier will check validity of access and will convert it to:
>
> dst_reg = *(u8 *)(src_reg + offsetof(struct sk_buff, __pkt_type_offset))
> dst_reg &= 7
>
> since skb->pkt_type is a bitfield.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
...
> +static u32 convert_skb_access(int skb_field, int dst_reg, int src_reg,
> +			      struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
> +
> +	switch (skb_field) {
> +	case SKF_AD_MARK:
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, mark) != 4);
> +
> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, dst_reg, src_reg,
> +				      offsetof(struct sk_buff, mark));
> +		break;
> +
> +	case SKF_AD_PKTTYPE:
> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, dst_reg, src_reg, PKT_TYPE_OFFSET());
> +		*insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, dst_reg, PKT_TYPE_MAX);
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
> +		*insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, dst_reg, 5);
> +#endif
> +		break;
> +
> +	case SKF_AD_QUEUE:
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, queue_mapping) != 2);
> +
> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, dst_reg, src_reg,
> +				      offsetof(struct sk_buff, queue_mapping));
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return insn - insn_buf;
> +}
> +
>   static bool convert_bpf_extensions(struct sock_filter *fp,
>   				   struct bpf_insn **insnp)
>   {
>   	struct bpf_insn *insn = *insnp;
> +	u32 cnt;
>
>   	switch (fp->k) {
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_PROTOCOL:
> @@ -167,13 +200,8 @@ static bool convert_bpf_extensions(struct sock_filter *fp,
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_PKTTYPE:
> -		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX,
> -				      PKT_TYPE_OFFSET());
> -		*insn = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_A, PKT_TYPE_MAX);
> -#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
> -		insn++;
> -                *insn = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_A, 5);
> -#endif
> +		cnt = convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_PKTTYPE, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX, insn);
> +		insn += cnt - 1;
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_IFINDEX:
> @@ -197,10 +225,8 @@ static bool convert_bpf_extensions(struct sock_filter *fp,
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_MARK:
> -		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, mark) != 4);
> -
> -		*insn = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX,
> -				    offsetof(struct sk_buff, mark));
> +		cnt = convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_MARK, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX, insn);
> +		insn += cnt - 1;
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_RXHASH:
> @@ -211,10 +237,8 @@ static bool convert_bpf_extensions(struct sock_filter *fp,
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_QUEUE:
> -		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, queue_mapping) != 2);
> -
> -		*insn = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX,
> -				    offsetof(struct sk_buff, queue_mapping));
> +		cnt = convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_QUEUE, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX, insn);
> +		insn += cnt - 1;
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG:
> @@ -1147,13 +1171,55 @@ sk_filter_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
...
> +static u32 sk_filter_convert_ctx_access(int dst_reg, int src_reg, int ctx_off,
> +					struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
> +
> +	switch (ctx_off) {
> +	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, len):
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, len) != 4);
> +
> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, dst_reg, src_reg,
> +				      offsetof(struct sk_buff, len));
> +		break;
> +
> +	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark):
> +		return convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_MARK, dst_reg, src_reg, insn);
> +
> +	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, pkt_type):
> +		return convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_PKTTYPE, dst_reg, src_reg, insn);
> +
> +	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, queue_mapping):
> +		return convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_QUEUE, dst_reg, src_reg, insn);
> +	}
> +
> +	return insn - insn_buf;
>   }

Hmm, I actually liked the previous version much better. :(

Now, some members use convert_skb_access() and some skb members are
converted directly in-place in both, convert_bpf_extensions() _and_
in sk_filter_convert_ctx_access().

Previously, it was much more consistent, which I like better. And only
because of the simple BUILD_BUG_ON()? :/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] bpf: allow extended BPF programs access skb fields
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 02:46:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550392F7.9040308@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426273064-4837-2-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com>

On 03/13/2015 07:57 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> introduce user accessible mirror of in-kernel 'struct sk_buff':
> struct __sk_buff {
>      __u32 len;
>      __u32 pkt_type;
>      __u32 mark;
>      __u32 queue_mapping;
> };
>
> bpf programs can do:
>
> int bpf_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> {
>      __u32 var = skb->pkt_type;
>
> which will be compiled to bpf assembler as:
>
> dst_reg = *(u32 *)(src_reg + 4) // 4 == offsetof(struct __sk_buff, pkt_type)
>
> bpf verifier will check validity of access and will convert it to:
>
> dst_reg = *(u8 *)(src_reg + offsetof(struct sk_buff, __pkt_type_offset))
> dst_reg &= 7
>
> since skb->pkt_type is a bitfield.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
...
> +static u32 convert_skb_access(int skb_field, int dst_reg, int src_reg,
> +			      struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
> +
> +	switch (skb_field) {
> +	case SKF_AD_MARK:
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, mark) != 4);
> +
> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, dst_reg, src_reg,
> +				      offsetof(struct sk_buff, mark));
> +		break;
> +
> +	case SKF_AD_PKTTYPE:
> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, dst_reg, src_reg, PKT_TYPE_OFFSET());
> +		*insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, dst_reg, PKT_TYPE_MAX);
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
> +		*insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, dst_reg, 5);
> +#endif
> +		break;
> +
> +	case SKF_AD_QUEUE:
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, queue_mapping) != 2);
> +
> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, dst_reg, src_reg,
> +				      offsetof(struct sk_buff, queue_mapping));
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return insn - insn_buf;
> +}
> +
>   static bool convert_bpf_extensions(struct sock_filter *fp,
>   				   struct bpf_insn **insnp)
>   {
>   	struct bpf_insn *insn = *insnp;
> +	u32 cnt;
>
>   	switch (fp->k) {
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_PROTOCOL:
> @@ -167,13 +200,8 @@ static bool convert_bpf_extensions(struct sock_filter *fp,
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_PKTTYPE:
> -		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX,
> -				      PKT_TYPE_OFFSET());
> -		*insn = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_A, PKT_TYPE_MAX);
> -#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
> -		insn++;
> -                *insn = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_A, 5);
> -#endif
> +		cnt = convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_PKTTYPE, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX, insn);
> +		insn += cnt - 1;
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_IFINDEX:
> @@ -197,10 +225,8 @@ static bool convert_bpf_extensions(struct sock_filter *fp,
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_MARK:
> -		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, mark) != 4);
> -
> -		*insn = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX,
> -				    offsetof(struct sk_buff, mark));
> +		cnt = convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_MARK, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX, insn);
> +		insn += cnt - 1;
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_RXHASH:
> @@ -211,10 +237,8 @@ static bool convert_bpf_extensions(struct sock_filter *fp,
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_QUEUE:
> -		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, queue_mapping) != 2);
> -
> -		*insn = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX,
> -				    offsetof(struct sk_buff, queue_mapping));
> +		cnt = convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_QUEUE, BPF_REG_A, BPF_REG_CTX, insn);
> +		insn += cnt - 1;
>   		break;
>
>   	case SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG:
> @@ -1147,13 +1171,55 @@ sk_filter_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
...
> +static u32 sk_filter_convert_ctx_access(int dst_reg, int src_reg, int ctx_off,
> +					struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
> +
> +	switch (ctx_off) {
> +	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, len):
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, len) != 4);
> +
> +		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, dst_reg, src_reg,
> +				      offsetof(struct sk_buff, len));
> +		break;
> +
> +	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark):
> +		return convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_MARK, dst_reg, src_reg, insn);
> +
> +	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, pkt_type):
> +		return convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_PKTTYPE, dst_reg, src_reg, insn);
> +
> +	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, queue_mapping):
> +		return convert_skb_access(SKF_AD_QUEUE, dst_reg, src_reg, insn);
> +	}
> +
> +	return insn - insn_buf;
>   }

Hmm, I actually liked the previous version much better. :(

Now, some members use convert_skb_access() and some skb members are
converted directly in-place in both, convert_bpf_extensions() _and_
in sk_filter_convert_ctx_access().

Previously, it was much more consistent, which I like better. And only
because of the simple BUILD_BUG_ON()? :/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-14  1:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-13 18:57 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] bpf: allow eBPF access skb fields Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-13 18:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-13 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] bpf: allow extended BPF programs " Alexei Starovoitov
     [not found]   ` <1426273064-4837-2-git-send-email-ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-14  1:46     ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-03-14  1:46       ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]       ` <550392F7.9040308-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-14  2:06         ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-14  2:06           ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-14  2:08           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-14  2:16             ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]               ` <55039A0D.20000-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-14  2:27                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-14  2:27                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-14  4:59                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-14  9:35                     ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]                       ` <550400D8.5060407-FeC+5ew28dpmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-14 15:55                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-14 15:55                           ` Alexei Starovoitov
     [not found]                           ` <550459E4.1050808-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-14 23:51                             ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-14 23:51                               ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-15  2:02                               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-14  2:07       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-03-13 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] samples: bpf: add skb->field examples and tests Alexei Starovoitov
     [not found] ` <1426273064-4837-1-git-send-email-ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-16  2:03   ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] bpf: allow eBPF access skb fields David Miller
2015-03-16  2:03     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550392F7.9040308@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel-fec+5ew28dpmcu3hniyyjq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tgraf-G/eBtMaohhA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.