From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: panel: change struct bits to a bit array
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 05:22:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5503C58C.7050203@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426288836-25749-1-git-send-email-illeida@openaliasbox.org>
Le 14/03/2015 00:20, Isaac Lleida a écrit :
>
> /*
> + * LCD signal states
> + */
> +#define LCD_BIT_E_MASK 0x1 /* E (data latch on falling edge) */
> +#define LCD_BIT_RS_MASK 0x2 /* RS (0 = cmd, 1 = data) */
> +#define LCD_BIT_RW_MASK 0x4 /* R/W (0 = W, 1 = R) */
> +#define LCD_BIT_BL_MASK 0x8 /* backlight (0 = off, 1 = on) */
> +#define LCD_BIT_CL_MASK 0x10 /* clock (latch on rising edge) */
> +#define LCD_BIT_DA_MASK 0x20 /* data */
> +
> +/*
> + * Bit array operations
> + */
> +#define BIT_ON(b, m) (b |= m)
> +#define BIT_OFF(b, m) (b &= ~m)
> +#define BIT_CHK(b, m) (b & m)
> +#define BIT_MOD(b, m, v) \
> + (((v) ? BIT_ON(b, m) : BIT_OFF(b, m))?1:0) \
> +
> @@ -674,12 +686,12 @@ static int set_data_bits(void)
> for (bit = 0; bit < LCD_BITS; bit++)
> val &= lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][bit][BIT_MSK];
>
> - val |= lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_E][bits.e]
> - | lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_RS][bits.rs]
> - | lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_RW][bits.rw]
> - | lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_BL][bits.bl]
> - | lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_CL][bits.cl]
> - | lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_DA][bits.da];
> + val |= lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_E][BIT_CHK(bits, LCD_BIT_E_MASK)]
> + | lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_RS][BIT_CHK(bits, LCD_BIT_RS_MASK)]
> + | lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_RW][BIT_CHK(bits, LCD_BIT_RW_MASK)]
> + | lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_BL][BIT_CHK(bits, LCD_BIT_BL_MASK)]
> + | lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_CL][BIT_CHK(bits, LCD_BIT_CL_MASK)]
> + | lcd_bits[LCD_PORT_D][LCD_BIT_DA][BIT_CHK(bits, LCD_BIT_DA_MASK)];
>
>
As I tried to explain in my previous post, are you sure that these lines
have the same meaning?
bits.something is either BIT_CLR or BIT_SET, that is to say 0 or 1.
Whereas BIT_CHK(bits, LCD_BIT_DA_MASK) for example, will0 or 0x20.
So you will not access the same value in lcd_bits. It can even access
memory outside of the array itself, leading to unexpected behaviour or
even maybe crash.
CJ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-14 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 23:20 [PATCH v2] staging: panel: change struct bits to a bit array Isaac Lleida
2015-03-13 23:20 ` Isaac Lleida
2015-03-14 5:22 ` Christophe JAILLET [this message]
2015-03-14 5:27 ` Christophe JAILLET
2015-03-14 8:32 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-14 8:44 ` Sudip Mukherjee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5503C58C.7050203@wanadoo.fr \
--to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.