From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
Zhangdianfang <zhangdianfang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:31:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5507CA2E.3040600@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5507C2C2.1090509@redhat.com>
On 2015/3/17 13:59, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> Well, almost. There is one problem with that, becuase sleep.c contains code
>>> outside of the ACPI_SLEEP-dependent blocks. That code is used for powering
>>> off ACPI platforms.
>>>
>>> I guess you don't want that code on ARM too, right?
>> Yes, you are right.
>>> Perhaps we can use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for that? ARM64 will be the
>> Sorry, I can't fully understand your intention here, could you please
>> explain it more?
>>
>> Let me guess a little bit. Do you mean use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for
>> powering off ACPI platforms? if so, I guess it's not a good idea, ACPI spec
>> only says that S4BIOS is not supported on HW-reduced ACPI platforms, S5
>> has no such limitation, if I miss something here, please let me know.
> If helpful to the discussion, current SBBR (Server Base Boot
> Requirements[0]) design guidance is that for power off itself, we will
> prefer calling an EFI Runtime Service (that will preferentially call an
> PSCI - ARM Power State Coordination Interface - Secure Monitor Call (SMC
> - think SMI-like) internally to perform the shutdown/reboot) for the
> action of powering off or resetting 64-bit ARM SBBR platforms.
Agreed, PSCI is the prefer method for power off on ARM64 I think.
>
> Therefore if the alternative of an ACPI-based power off solution were
> not initially supported, I don't think it would have much practical
> impact, and it could be addressed after the initial support merged.
I agree. Actually we already removed ACPI power off code for ARM64
in v9 and v10 regardless the ACPI sepc statement about S5, I just want to
confirm with Rafael that how to use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY properly
to do the same thing as we do in v10 (patch - ACPI / sleep: Introduce
CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP), or if we have some other way to do that :)
Thanks
Hanjun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: guohanjun@huawei.com (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:31:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5507CA2E.3040600@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5507C2C2.1090509@redhat.com>
On 2015/3/17 13:59, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> Well, almost. There is one problem with that, becuase sleep.c contains code
>>> outside of the ACPI_SLEEP-dependent blocks. That code is used for powering
>>> off ACPI platforms.
>>>
>>> I guess you don't want that code on ARM too, right?
>> Yes, you are right.
>>> Perhaps we can use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for that? ARM64 will be the
>> Sorry, I can't fully understand your intention here, could you please
>> explain it more?
>>
>> Let me guess a little bit. Do you mean use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for
>> powering off ACPI platforms? if so, I guess it's not a good idea, ACPI spec
>> only says that S4BIOS is not supported on HW-reduced ACPI platforms, S5
>> has no such limitation, if I miss something here, please let me know.
> If helpful to the discussion, current SBBR (Server Base Boot
> Requirements[0]) design guidance is that for power off itself, we will
> prefer calling an EFI Runtime Service (that will preferentially call an
> PSCI - ARM Power State Coordination Interface - Secure Monitor Call (SMC
> - think SMI-like) internally to perform the shutdown/reboot) for the
> action of powering off or resetting 64-bit ARM SBBR platforms.
Agreed, PSCI is the prefer method for power off on ARM64 I think.
>
> Therefore if the alternative of an ACPI-based power off solution were
> not initially supported, I don't think it would have much practical
> impact, and it could be addressed after the initial support merged.
I agree. Actually we already removed ACPI power off code for ARM64
in v9 and v10 regardless the ACPI sepc statement about S5, I just want to
confirm with Rafael that how to use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY properly
to do the same thing as we do in v10 (patch - ACPI / sleep: Introduce
CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP), or if we have some other way to do that :)
Thanks
Hanjun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
"Sudeep Holla" <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org>,
<suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
Zhangdianfang <zhangdianfang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:31:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5507CA2E.3040600@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5507C2C2.1090509@redhat.com>
On 2015/3/17 13:59, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> Well, almost. There is one problem with that, becuase sleep.c contains code
>>> outside of the ACPI_SLEEP-dependent blocks. That code is used for powering
>>> off ACPI platforms.
>>>
>>> I guess you don't want that code on ARM too, right?
>> Yes, you are right.
>>> Perhaps we can use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for that? ARM64 will be the
>> Sorry, I can't fully understand your intention here, could you please
>> explain it more?
>>
>> Let me guess a little bit. Do you mean use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for
>> powering off ACPI platforms? if so, I guess it's not a good idea, ACPI spec
>> only says that S4BIOS is not supported on HW-reduced ACPI platforms, S5
>> has no such limitation, if I miss something here, please let me know.
> If helpful to the discussion, current SBBR (Server Base Boot
> Requirements[0]) design guidance is that for power off itself, we will
> prefer calling an EFI Runtime Service (that will preferentially call an
> PSCI - ARM Power State Coordination Interface - Secure Monitor Call (SMC
> - think SMI-like) internally to perform the shutdown/reboot) for the
> action of powering off or resetting 64-bit ARM SBBR platforms.
Agreed, PSCI is the prefer method for power off on ARM64 I think.
>
> Therefore if the alternative of an ACPI-based power off solution were
> not initially supported, I don't think it would have much practical
> impact, and it could be addressed after the initial support merged.
I agree. Actually we already removed ACPI power off code for ARM64
in v9 and v10 regardless the ACPI sepc statement about S5, I just want to
confirm with Rafael that how to use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY properly
to do the same thing as we do in v10 (patch - ACPI / sleep: Introduce
CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP), or if we have some other way to do that :)
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-17 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 8:14 [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP Hanjun Guo
2015-03-13 8:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-13 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-13 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-16 12:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-16 12:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-16 12:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-16 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-16 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-16 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 1:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 1:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 1:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 2:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 2:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 2:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 2:36 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 2:36 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 2:36 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 3:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 3:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 3:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 4:10 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 4:10 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 4:10 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 5:59 ` Jon Masters
2015-03-17 5:59 ` Jon Masters
2015-03-17 6:31 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-03-17 6:31 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 6:31 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 14:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 14:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 14:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-18 1:56 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-18 1:56 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-18 1:56 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 12:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-17 12:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-17 12:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
[not found] ` <CAGHbJ3DhUB688K7ooT7ai=2QjRp7S+_E_Y+a+GupeTvjR5omMg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-03-17 14:29 ` [PATCH] ACPI / sleep: Drop acpi_suspend() which is not used Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 14:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-18 1:17 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 14:30 ` [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 14:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 14:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5507CA2E.3040600@huawei.com \
--to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashwinc@codeaurora.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=zhangdianfang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.