Re: [Qemu-devel] Fedora Virt preview and qemu 2.2.1 update

[Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1438 bytes --]

On 03/17/2015 12:28 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:

> Yes, but shouldn't be there a difference between rawhide (e.g. 2.3-rc0)
> and fedora virt preview library (e.g. currently 2.2.1)?
> Or is rawhide everything and fedora-virt-preview.repo only the virt part
> of rawhide?
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository
> http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/fedora-virt-preview.repo

fedora-virt-preview aims to ship in Fedora N what you would otherwise
have to use Fedora N+1 for, limiting to just virtualization packages.
So if rawhide (F23) is shipping qemu 2.2.1, then fedora-virt-preview for
F22 will also ship qemu 2.2.1.

> 
> Nevertheless I don't see any advantages releasing RC production quality
> to the rawhide repository as we expect the release soon.

I see tremendous benefit to putting the RC candidate in rawhide - that
much extra testing to make sure the final release is not going to cause
unexpected regressions.

> 
> As my question regarding "support" for virt preview was not answered
> when I had problems and tried it I think I'll switch back to Fedora
> supported repos.

This list isn't the primary list for fedora-virt-preview questions; it's
not that the product is unsupported, but that the support is better
found on the correct list.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]