From: Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>,
"Dmitriy B." <rzk333@gmail.com>
Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org"
<meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>,
Gennady Kuznetsov <kuznetsovg@dev.rtsoft.ru>
Subject: Re: imx6q gpu performance lower than expected
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:59:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550887BB.5090708@dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKronh19j4vjZL27ubjjc=PiCWrOu_VX+sR-fb5jr1wRMw@mail.gmail.com>
17.03.2015 21:20, Otavio Salvador пишет:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Dmitriy B. <rzk333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2015-03-17 17:08 GMT+03:00 Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru>:
> ...
>>> CPU in both cases (x11 and egl) is almost unloaded (30% of one core
>>> under eglfs, 30+30 under X11) so looks like speed limiting comes from GPU.
>>>
>>> What could be reason for this? Any hints?
>>
>> Hint: Vivante X11 GPU drivers use DRI1(one, the 1998 one) and need a asm
>> patch to libdrm to work. Guess what happens when you drag 90s technology to
>> latest X.org on an embedded device.
>
> EGLFS is the best choice here.
As I've written in the original mail, eglfs shows about the same fps as
xcb does. Maybe several percent better (i.e. 37 vs 35) but that does not
look serious.
What FPS do other boards imx6 show under dizzy?
Interested if this is our setup problem or generic hardware limitation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-17 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-17 14:08 imx6q gpu performance lower than expected Nikita Yushchenko
2015-03-17 15:16 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-03-17 17:56 ` Dmitriy B.
2015-03-17 18:20 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-03-17 19:59 ` Nikita Yushchenko [this message]
2015-03-18 9:55 ` eien sakebe
2015-03-23 14:10 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2015-03-25 7:57 ` Dmitriy B.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=550887BB.5090708@dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru \
--cc=kuznetsovg@dev.rtsoft.ru \
--cc=meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
--cc=rzk333@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.