From: Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru>
To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
Cc: Gennady Kuznetsov <kuznetsovg@dev.rtsoft.ru>
Subject: Re: imx6q gpu performance lower than expected
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:10:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55101EE3.5010201@dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55083559.2010704@dev.rtsoft.ru>
Following up myself.
We have tested master + qt 5.3.2 and master + qt 5.4.1 combinations, with LVDS 1280x800 screen and eglfs backend.
Overall results are:
dizzy, qt 5.3.2, imx6s => 22 fps [this is poor hw, included just for reference]
dizzy, qt 5.3.2, imx6q => 37 fps
master, qt 5.3.2, imx6q => 49 fps
master, qt 5.4.1, imx6q => 59 fps
Thus "memory bandwidth" is *not* the limiting factor on original setup.
Pure software update resulted into significant fps improvement.
Many thanks to Heikki Sarkanen for information that master branch shows better graphics performance.
> Hi
>
> I've built freescale community bsp dizzy for a custom imx6q based board,
> and now I'm experimenting with GPU performance under Qt5.
>
> I have both xcb and eglfs backends running (under different builds).
>
> However performance is lower than was expected: on LVDS 1280x800,
> Qt5_CinematicExperience shows about 35-37 FPS, both under X11 and under
> eglfs. If using smaller window under X11, FPS increases, if using
> 1920x1080 it goes down to 20.
>
> This is much smaller than people get [1].
>
> [1] https://community.freescale.com/thread/305066
>
> CPU in both cases (x11 and egl) is almost unloaded (30% of one core
> under eglfs, 30+30 under X11) so looks like speed limiting comes from GPU.
>
> What could be reason for this? Any hints?
>
>
> TIA,
> Nikita Yushchenko
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-17 14:08 imx6q gpu performance lower than expected Nikita Yushchenko
2015-03-17 15:16 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-03-17 17:56 ` Dmitriy B.
2015-03-17 18:20 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-03-17 19:59 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2015-03-18 9:55 ` eien sakebe
2015-03-23 14:10 ` Nikita Yushchenko [this message]
2015-03-25 7:57 ` Dmitriy B.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55101EE3.5010201@dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru \
--cc=kuznetsovg@dev.rtsoft.ru \
--cc=meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.