Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

[Randy MacLeod]

As stated in the post below, ruby-1.9.3 is no longer supported
and CVEs will not be released.

I'm not a rubyist but I assume we should upgrade to ruby-2.2.0 which
became the stable version as of December 25, 2014. Comments?
Martin, you are listed as maintainer of the meta-multimedia,
do you have any concerns about such an upgrade?

If anyone wants to start work on this for meta-oe, that'd be great.
If no one gets around to it, then a developer from WindRiver will
likely be able to work on it but not a few months.

../Randy

---
As of today, all support for Ruby 1.9.3 has ended. Bug and security 
fixes from more recent Ruby versions will no longer be backported to 1.9.3.

This end of life was announced over a year ago.

We highly recommend that you upgrade to Ruby 2.0.0 or above as soon as 
possible. Please contact us if you’d like to continue maintaining the 
1.9.3 branch or if for some reason you can’t upgrade.

Posted by Olivier Lacan on 23 Feb 2015
---
Also see:
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/ReleaseEngineering

-- 
# Randy MacLeod. SMTS, Linux, Wind River
Direct: 613.963.1350 | 350 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 200 Ottawa, Ontario, 
Canada K2K 2W5

Re: Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1531 bytes --]

On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote:
> 
> As stated in the post below, ruby-1.9.3 is no longer supported
> and CVEs will not be released.
> 
> I'm not a rubyist but I assume we should upgrade to ruby-2.2.0 which
> became the stable version as of December 25, 2014. Comments?
> Martin, you are listed as maintainer of the meta-multimedia,
> do you have any concerns about such an upgrade?

No concerns from me.. I don't use ruby much (mostly ruby-native for
webkit builds) so I would welcome such upgrade.

> If anyone wants to start work on this for meta-oe, that'd be great.
> If no one gets around to it, then a developer from WindRiver will
> likely be able to work on it but not a few months.
> 
> ../Randy
> 
> ---
> As of today, all support for Ruby 1.9.3 has ended. Bug and security 
> fixes from more recent Ruby versions will no longer be backported to 1.9.3.
> 
> This end of life was announced over a year ago.
> 
> We highly recommend that you upgrade to Ruby 2.0.0 or above as soon as 
> possible. Please contact us if you’d like to continue maintaining the 
> 1.9.3 branch or if for some reason you can’t upgrade.
> 
> Posted by Olivier Lacan on 23 Feb 2015
> ---
> Also see:
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/ReleaseEngineering
> 
> -- 
> # Randy MacLeod. SMTS, Linux, Wind River
> Direct: 613.963.1350 | 350 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 200 Ottawa, Ontario, 
> Canada K2K 2W5

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

[akuster808]

Randy,


On 03/02/2015 06:26 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote:
>>
>> As stated in the post below, ruby-1.9.3 is no longer supported
>> and CVEs will not be released.
>>
>> I'm not a rubyist but I assume we should upgrade to ruby-2.2.0 which
>> became the stable version as of December 25, 2014. Comments?
>> Martin, you are listed as maintainer of the meta-multimedia,
>> do you have any concerns about such an upgrade?
>
> No concerns from me.. I don't use ruby much (mostly ruby-native for
> webkit builds) so I would welcome such upgrade.
>
>> If anyone wants to start work on this for meta-oe, that'd be great.
>> If no one gets around to it, then a developer from WindRiver will
>> likely be able to work on it but not a few months.

I started on the upgrade. Hope to have it done soon.
- Armin

>>
>> ../Randy
>>
>> ---
>> As of today, all support for Ruby 1.9.3 has ended. Bug and security
>> fixes from more recent Ruby versions will no longer be backported to 1.9.3.
>>
>> This end of life was announced over a year ago.
>>
>> We highly recommend that you upgrade to Ruby 2.0.0 or above as soon as
>> possible. Please contact us if you’d like to continue maintaining the
>> 1.9.3 branch or if for some reason you can’t upgrade.
>>
>> Posted by Olivier Lacan on 23 Feb 2015
>> ---
>> Also see:
>> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/ReleaseEngineering
>>
>> --
>> # Randy MacLeod. SMTS, Linux, Wind River
>> Direct: 613.963.1350 | 350 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 200 Ottawa, Ontario,
>> Canada K2K 2W5
>
>
>

Re: Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

[Tim Orling]

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:39 PM, akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote:

> Randy,
>
>
> On 03/02/2015 06:26 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> As stated in the post below, ruby-1.9.3 is no longer supported
>>> and CVEs will not be released.
>>>
>>> I'm not a rubyist but I assume we should upgrade to ruby-2.2.0 which
>>> became the stable version as of December 25, 2014. Comments?
>>> Martin, you are listed as maintainer of the meta-multimedia,
>>> do you have any concerns about such an upgrade?
>>>
>>
>> No concerns from me.. I don't use ruby much (mostly ruby-native for
>> webkit builds) so I would welcome such upgrade.
>>
>>  If anyone wants to start work on this for meta-oe, that'd be great.
>>> If no one gets around to it, then a developer from WindRiver will
>>> likely be able to work on it but not a few months.
>>>
>>
> I started on the upgrade. Hope to have it done soon.
> - Armin
>

I will help if there is any collateral damage in meta-openembedded.
-Tim

>
>
>>> ../Randy
>>>
>>> ---
>>> As of today, all support for Ruby 1.9.3 has ended. Bug and security
>>> fixes from more recent Ruby versions will no longer be backported to
>>> 1.9.3.
>>>
>>> This end of life was announced over a year ago.
>>>
>>> We highly recommend that you upgrade to Ruby 2.0.0 or above as soon as
>>> possible. Please contact us if you’d like to continue maintaining the
>>> 1.9.3 branch or if for some reason you can’t upgrade.
>>>
>>> Posted by Olivier Lacan on 23 Feb 2015
>>> ---
>>> Also see:
>>> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/ReleaseEngineering
>>>
>>> --
>>> # Randy MacLeod. SMTS, Linux, Wind River
>>> Direct: 613.963.1350 | 350 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 200 Ottawa, Ontario,
>>> Canada K2K 2W5
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

Re: Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

[Randy MacLeod]

On 2015-04-02 12:57 AM, Tim Orling wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:39 PM, akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com
> <mailto:akuster808@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Randy,
>
>
>     On 03/02/2015 06:26 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
>         On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote:
>
>
>             As stated in the post below, ruby-1.9.3 is no longer supported
>             and CVEs will not be released.
>
>             I'm not a rubyist but I assume we should upgrade to
>             ruby-2.2.0 which
>             became the stable version as of December 25, 2014. Comments?
>             Martin, you are listed as maintainer of the meta-multimedia,
>             do you have any concerns about such an upgrade?
>
>
>         No concerns from me.. I don't use ruby much (mostly ruby-native for
>         webkit builds) so I would welcome such upgrade.
>
>             If anyone wants to start work on this for meta-oe, that'd be
>             great.
>             If no one gets around to it, then a developer from WindRiver
>             will
>             likely be able to work on it but not a few months.
>
>
>     I started on the upgrade. Hope to have it done soon.
>     - Armin
>
>
> I will help if there is any collateral damage in meta-openembedded.
> -Tim

Thanks for the notice. We're busy with other projects so
we haven't started or even discussed the ruby work yet.

We'll be more active in OE in May or June. We include lots
of OE recipes (meta-networking/webserver/python /...) in WR Linux, FYI.

../Randy
>
>
>
>             ../Randy
>
>             ---
>             As of today, all support for Ruby 1.9.3 has ended. Bug and
>             security
>             fixes from more recent Ruby versions will no longer be
>             backported to 1.9.3.
>
>             This end of life was announced over a year ago.
>
>             We highly recommend that you upgrade to Ruby 2.0.0 or above
>             as soon as
>             possible. Please contact us if you’d like to continue
>             maintaining the
>             1.9.3 branch or if for some reason you can’t upgrade.
>
>             Posted by Olivier Lacan on 23 Feb 2015
>             ---
>             Also see:
>             https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/__projects/ruby/wiki/__ReleaseEngineering
>             <https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/ReleaseEngineering>
>
>             --
>             # Randy MacLeod. SMTS, Linux, Wind River
>             Direct: 613.963.1350 <tel:613.963.1350> | 350 Terry Fox
>             Drive, Suite 200 Ottawa, Ontario,
>             Canada K2K 2W5
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     _________________________________________________
>     Openembedded-devel mailing list
>     Openembedded-devel@lists.__openembedded.org
>     <mailto:Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
>     http://lists.openembedded.org/__mailman/listinfo/openembedded-__devel <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>
>
>


-- 
# Randy MacLeod. SMTS, Linux, Wind River
Direct: 613.963.1350 | 350 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 200 Ottawa, Ontario, 
Canada K2K 2W5