From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mpt2sas: store scsi io tracker data in the scsi command / request
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:13:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55240223.4070205@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150405160359.GD28173@lst.de>
On 04/05/2015 10:03 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 09:58:22AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> +struct scsiio_tracker *
>> +mpt2sas_get_st_from_smid(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u16 smid)
>> +{
>> + if (shost_use_blk_mq(ioc->shost)) {
>> + struct scsi_cmnd *scmd;
>> +
>> + scmd = scsi_mq_find_tag(ioc->shost, smid - 1);
>> + if (!scmd)
>> + return NULL;
>> + return scsi_mq_scmd_to_pdu(scmd);
>> + } else
>> + return &ioc->scsi_lookup[smid - 1];
>> +}
>
> The mq case will also work for the !mq case when you call
> scsi_host_find_tag and scsi_cmd_priv. In general all the mq-specific
> codepathes you add should become the default and only one, even if this
> requires a lit bit of additional core work.
For the core code, I definitely agree. But for this case, in scsi-mq
mode, we know that tag == smid - 1. That's not the case if we are not
using scsi-mq.
In general, it'd be great if we could "convert" drivers and not have to
support both scsi-mq and legacy mode. Then I could just rip the old code.
>> @@ -1724,6 +1739,18 @@ mpt2sas_base_get_smid_scsiio(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u8 cb_idx,
>> struct scsiio_tracker *request;
>> u16 smid;
>>
>> + if (shost_use_blk_mq(ioc->shost)) {
>> + /*
>> + * If we don't have a SCSI command associated with this smid,
>> + * bump it to high-prio
>> + */
>> + if (!scmd)
>> + return mpt2sas_base_get_smid_hpr(ioc, cb_idx);
>
> Seems like _ctl_do_mpt_command should be changed to just
> call mpt2sas_base_get_smid_hpr unconditionally instead of adding this
> hack Preferably as a standalone preparatory patch.
Sounds reasonable, I'll do that.
>> unsigned long flags;
>> int i;
>> - struct chain_tracker *chain_req, *next;
>> +
>> + if (shost_use_blk_mq(ioc->shost) && smid < ioc->hi_priority_smid) {
>> + struct scsiio_tracker *st;
>> +
>> + st = mpt2sas_get_st_from_smid(ioc, smid);
>> + if (!st)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + st->direct_io = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!list_empty(&st->chain_list)) {
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ioc->scsi_lookup_lock, flags);
>> + _dechain_st(ioc, st);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->scsi_lookup_lock, flags);
>> + }
>
> This whole chain list thing looks bonkers to me. We always allocated
> a fixed multiple of the queue depth in ->chain_lookup, but then do this
> required list manipulation at least once per I/O submission and completion.
It is completely crazy, and very suboptimal. The only thing that "saves"
it is that we only need to do it multiple times for larger IOs, where a
larger per-IO hit can be accepted. But yes, it really should just die a
horrible death.
> Seems like we should instead add an array of (cpu address, dma address)
> tuples to the scsiio_tracker and avoid all the chain_lookup / chain_list
> lookups entirely.
Agree.
>> + if (shost_use_blk_mq(ioc->shost)) {
>> + scmd = scsi_mq_find_tag(ioc->shost, i);
>> + if (scsi_mq_scmd_started(scmd))
>> + pending++;
>
> Ok, I guess we should move the request_started check into the _find_tag
> helpers, as tags that aren't started aren't something that driver
> should ever lookup.
I'll move it in there.
>> +static bool
>> +_scmd_match(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, u16 handle, u32 lun)
>> +{
>> + struct MPT2SAS_DEVICE *priv_data;
>> +
>> + if (scmd == NULL || scmd->device == NULL ||
>> + scmd->device->hostdata == NULL)
>> + return false;
>
> If the queue is started this can't ever happen.
>
>> + if (lun != scmd->device->lun)
>> + return false;
>
> If you pass in a specific scsi_device and thus request_queue this
> can't happen.
>
>> +static u16
>> +_ctl_find_smid(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, u16 handle, u32 lun)
>> +{
>> + if (shost_use_blk_mq(ioc->shost))
>> + return _ctl_find_smid_mq(ioc, handle, lun);
>> + else
>> + return _ctl_find_smid_legacy(ioc, handle, lun);
>> +}
>
> The caller of this looks entirely broken. It's a driver specific API
> to submit task management commands, duplicating the mid level code,
> and it doesn't even allow which task to target. I think we should
> just return a error when invoking MPI2_FUNCTION_SCSI_TASK_MGMT instead
> of digging us an even deeper grave here. If someone complains we'll
> have to find a way to redirect it to the generic EH ioctls.
Sounds fine to me, will make my life a lot easier and we can kill this
horrible lookup mess.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-03 15:58 [PATCH RFC] mpt2/mpt3sas lock reduction for scsi-mq Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: allow the callback to blk_mq_tag_busy_iter() to stop looping Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: add helper to iterate all busy tags on all hardware queues Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 3/7] scsi: add scsi-mq helpers to retrieve pdu and check started state Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-05 15:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 4/7] scsi: add scsi-mq helper for iterating over busy commands Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-05 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi: add host template init/exit_command hooks Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-05 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 6/7] mpt2sas: store scsi io tracker data in the scsi command / request Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-05 16:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-07 16:13 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-04-07 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-07 19:22 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 7/7] mpt3sas: " Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55240223.4070205@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.