All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	shc_work@mail.ru, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	hsweeten@visionengravers.com,
	Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:21:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552660C7.4020805@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150409110634.GA27407@amd>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2259 bytes --]

On 09/04/15 14:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2015-04-07 14:19:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>> I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
>>> in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
>>>
>>> root@wagabuibui:~# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
>>> real               0m 0.00s
>>> user               0m 0.00s
>>> sys                0m 0.00s
>>>
>>> on 3.18, this takes 220msec. Similar slowdown exists for
>>> writes. Simple framebuffer did not change at all between 3.15 and
>>> 3.18; resource flags of the framebuffer are still same (0x200).
>>>
>>> If I enable caching on 3.18, it speeds up a bit, to 70msec or
>>> so... Which means problem is not only in caching.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>> My first guess was  commit 67dc0d4758e5 ("vt_buffer: drop console buffer
>> copying optimisations"), but this was introduced only in v4.0-rc1.
>>
>> Just in case you encounter another performance regression after upgrading
>> to a more modern kernel ;-)
> 
> :-). I did a git bisect, and it pointed to this. And reverting it
> indeed fixes the problem in 3.18. Problem is still there in 4.0.

Interesting. I can reproduce this also on TI's AM437x board, on 3.14
kernel. Without the patch:

# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real    0m 0.01s
user    0m 0.00s
sys     0m 0.01s

With the patch:

# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real    0m 0.19s
user    0m 0.01s
sys     0m 0.17s

> Archit do you know what is going on there? Should the revert be filled
> for 4.0?

(Cc'ing Archit's new email)

> 
> 								Pavel
> 
> commit 981409b25e2a99409b26daa67293ca1cfd5ea0a0
> Author: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
> Date:   Fri Nov 16 14:46:04 2012 +0530
> 
>     fbdev: arm has __raw I/O accessors, use them in fb.h
> 
>     This removes the sparse warnings on arm platforms:
> 
>     warning: cast removes address space of expression
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
>  Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
>  Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
>  Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
>  Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	shc_work@mail.ru, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	hsweeten@visionengravers.com,
	Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:21:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552660C7.4020805@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150409110634.GA27407@amd>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2259 bytes --]

On 09/04/15 14:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2015-04-07 14:19:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>> I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
>>> in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
>>>
>>> root@wagabuibui:~# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
>>> real               0m 0.00s
>>> user               0m 0.00s
>>> sys                0m 0.00s
>>>
>>> on 3.18, this takes 220msec. Similar slowdown exists for
>>> writes. Simple framebuffer did not change at all between 3.15 and
>>> 3.18; resource flags of the framebuffer are still same (0x200).
>>>
>>> If I enable caching on 3.18, it speeds up a bit, to 70msec or
>>> so... Which means problem is not only in caching.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>> My first guess was  commit 67dc0d4758e5 ("vt_buffer: drop console buffer
>> copying optimisations"), but this was introduced only in v4.0-rc1.
>>
>> Just in case you encounter another performance regression after upgrading
>> to a more modern kernel ;-)
> 
> :-). I did a git bisect, and it pointed to this. And reverting it
> indeed fixes the problem in 3.18. Problem is still there in 4.0.

Interesting. I can reproduce this also on TI's AM437x board, on 3.14
kernel. Without the patch:

# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real    0m 0.01s
user    0m 0.00s
sys     0m 0.01s

With the patch:

# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real    0m 0.19s
user    0m 0.01s
sys     0m 0.17s

> Archit do you know what is going on there? Should the revert be filled
> for 4.0?

(Cc'ing Archit's new email)

> 
> 								Pavel
> 
> commit 981409b25e2a99409b26daa67293ca1cfd5ea0a0
> Author: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
> Date:   Fri Nov 16 14:46:04 2012 +0530
> 
>     fbdev: arm has __raw I/O accessors, use them in fb.h
> 
>     This removes the sparse warnings on arm platforms:
> 
>     warning: cast removes address space of expression
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
>  Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
>  Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
>  Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
>  Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<shc_work@mail.ru>, <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	<hsweeten@visionengravers.com>,
	Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:21:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552660C7.4020805@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150409110634.GA27407@amd>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2259 bytes --]

On 09/04/15 14:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2015-04-07 14:19:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>> I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
>>> in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
>>>
>>> root@wagabuibui:~# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
>>> real               0m 0.00s
>>> user               0m 0.00s
>>> sys                0m 0.00s
>>>
>>> on 3.18, this takes 220msec. Similar slowdown exists for
>>> writes. Simple framebuffer did not change at all between 3.15 and
>>> 3.18; resource flags of the framebuffer are still same (0x200).
>>>
>>> If I enable caching on 3.18, it speeds up a bit, to 70msec or
>>> so... Which means problem is not only in caching.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>> My first guess was  commit 67dc0d4758e5 ("vt_buffer: drop console buffer
>> copying optimisations"), but this was introduced only in v4.0-rc1.
>>
>> Just in case you encounter another performance regression after upgrading
>> to a more modern kernel ;-)
> 
> :-). I did a git bisect, and it pointed to this. And reverting it
> indeed fixes the problem in 3.18. Problem is still there in 4.0.

Interesting. I can reproduce this also on TI's AM437x board, on 3.14
kernel. Without the patch:

# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real    0m 0.01s
user    0m 0.00s
sys     0m 0.01s

With the patch:

# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
real    0m 0.19s
user    0m 0.01s
sys     0m 0.17s

> Archit do you know what is going on there? Should the revert be filled
> for 4.0?

(Cc'ing Archit's new email)

> 
> 								Pavel
> 
> commit 981409b25e2a99409b26daa67293ca1cfd5ea0a0
> Author: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
> Date:   Fri Nov 16 14:46:04 2012 +0530
> 
>     fbdev: arm has __raw I/O accessors, use them in fb.h
> 
>     This removes the sparse warnings on arm platforms:
> 
>     warning: cast removes address space of expression
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
>  Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
>  Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten at visionengravers.com>
>  Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
>  Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-09 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-07 12:12 simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform Pavel Machek
2015-04-07 12:12 ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-07 12:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-07 12:19   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-07 14:24   ` Marek Vasut
2015-04-07 14:24     ` Marek Vasut
2015-04-09 11:06   ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-09 11:06     ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-09 11:21     ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2015-04-09 11:21       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-04-09 11:21       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-04-09 11:34       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-04-09 11:34         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-04-09 11:34         ` Tomi Valkeinen
     [not found]         ` <552663C2.70308-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-09 19:51           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-09 19:51             ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-09 19:51             ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-24 13:31             ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-24 13:31               ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-24 13:31               ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-10  7:05         ` Archit Taneja
2015-04-10  7:17           ` Archit Taneja
2015-04-24 13:29           ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-24 13:29             ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-24 13:40             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-04-24 13:40               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-04-24 13:40               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-04-24 13:46               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-24 13:46                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-26 19:31                 ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-26 19:31                   ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-28 13:48                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-28 13:48                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
     [not found]                   ` <20150428134848.GC12732-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-28 15:28                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-04-28 15:28                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-04-28 15:28                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-05-06 10:45                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-06 10:45                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-06 20:32                         ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-05-06 20:32                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-05-12  8:52                         ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-12  8:52                           ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=552660C7.4020805@ti.com \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dinh.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=hsweeten@visionengravers.com \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shc_work@mail.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.