From: Bert Vermeulen <bert@biot.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, jogo@openwrt.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] spi: Add SPI driver for Mikrotik RB4xx series boards
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:31:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5527ECC3.1000209@biot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150409215047.GE6023@sirena.org.uk>
On 04/09/2015 11:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:31:12PM +0200, Bert Vermeulen wrote:
>> The m25p80-compatible boot flash and (some models) MMC use regular SPI,
>> bitbanged as required by the SoC. However the SPI-connected CPLD has
>> a "fast write" mode, in which two bits are transferred by SPI clock
>> cycle. The second bit is transmitted with the SoC's CS2 pin.
>
>> Protocol drivers using this fast write facility signal this by setting
>> the cs_change flag on transfers.
>
>> The cs_change flag is used here instead of the openwrt version's
>> spi_transfer.fast_write flag. The CPLD driver sets this flag on a
>> per-transfer basis.
>
> No, this is broken - it's abusing a standard API in a way that's
> completly incompatible with the meaning of that API which is obviously a
> very bad idea, especially since good practice is to offload the
> implementation of that standard API to the core. It *sounds* like
> you're just trying to implement two wire mode which does have a standard
> API, please use that.
Can you please advise what kind of solution would be acceptable then? I need
to signal from an SPI protocol driver to an SPI master on a per-transfer basis.
Adding a flag to struct spi_transfer for this one driver, as openwrt does,
seems stupid -- I agree. And sure, using spi_transfer.cs_change is a little
dodgy. But I don't see a standard way to do it otherwise, and I don't really
want to keep trying things until you approve of one. So tell me how you
would do it, and I'll implement it that way. I just want to get this code in.
Also, I have no idea what you mean by two-wire mode. This "fast mode" is SPI
+ one extra pin.
--
Bert Vermeulen bert@biot.com email/xmpp
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bert Vermeulen <bert-Nh2F35Ii2RQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: ralf-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
andy.shevchenko-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
jogo-p3rKhJxN3npAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] spi: Add SPI driver for Mikrotik RB4xx series boards
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:31:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5527ECC3.1000209@biot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150409215047.GE6023-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
On 04/09/2015 11:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:31:12PM +0200, Bert Vermeulen wrote:
>> The m25p80-compatible boot flash and (some models) MMC use regular SPI,
>> bitbanged as required by the SoC. However the SPI-connected CPLD has
>> a "fast write" mode, in which two bits are transferred by SPI clock
>> cycle. The second bit is transmitted with the SoC's CS2 pin.
>
>> Protocol drivers using this fast write facility signal this by setting
>> the cs_change flag on transfers.
>
>> The cs_change flag is used here instead of the openwrt version's
>> spi_transfer.fast_write flag. The CPLD driver sets this flag on a
>> per-transfer basis.
>
> No, this is broken - it's abusing a standard API in a way that's
> completly incompatible with the meaning of that API which is obviously a
> very bad idea, especially since good practice is to offload the
> implementation of that standard API to the core. It *sounds* like
> you're just trying to implement two wire mode which does have a standard
> API, please use that.
Can you please advise what kind of solution would be acceptable then? I need
to signal from an SPI protocol driver to an SPI master on a per-transfer basis.
Adding a flag to struct spi_transfer for this one driver, as openwrt does,
seems stupid -- I agree. And sure, using spi_transfer.cs_change is a little
dodgy. But I don't see a standard way to do it otherwise, and I don't really
want to keep trying things until you approve of one. So tell me how you
would do it, and I'll implement it that way. I just want to get this code in.
Also, I have no idea what you mean by two-wire mode. This "fast mode" is SPI
+ one extra pin.
--
Bert Vermeulen bert-Nh2F35Ii2RQ@public.gmane.org email/xmpp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-10 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 1:54 [PATCH v6] spi: Add SPI driver for Mikrotik RB4xx series boards Bert Vermeulen
2015-04-06 1:54 ` Bert Vermeulen
2015-04-06 9:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-04-06 16:39 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-06 16:39 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-09 21:31 ` Bert Vermeulen
2015-04-09 21:31 ` Bert Vermeulen
2015-04-09 21:50 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-10 15:31 ` Bert Vermeulen [this message]
2015-04-10 15:31 ` Bert Vermeulen
2015-04-10 15:45 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-10 15:45 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5527ECC3.1000209@biot.com \
--to=bert@biot.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jogo@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.