From: maxime.coquelin@st.com (Maxime Coquelin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Allowing reset controllers before SMP initialization (on ARM)?
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:42:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552F83F0.1090403@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2592960.UsK4Hr7GSl@wuerfel>
Hi Florian, Arnd,
On 04/16/2015 10:04 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 April 2015 17:51:18 Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In order to support initialization of the secondary core on BCM63138
>> SoCs, I would want to utilize a reset controller to release the
>> secondary CPU from reset [1].
>>
>> Here are multiple options:
>>
>> - expose a custom function which registers the reset controller platform
>> driver as early as possible, which is probably acceptable, but also
>> requires the DT machine descriptor to populate the platform bus earlier,
>> which we could completely avoid
> I think populating the platform bus earlier is not realistic, that
> would break lots of existing dependencies. In particular, we can't
> do it much earlier because it has to be done after the platform bus
> itself is instantiated.
>
>> - have a OF_DECLARE_RESET_CONTROLLER() which is running fairly early
>> during boot, such that we can utilize reset controllers are early as
>> possible, before any initcall level, and before SMP initialization is
>> kicking in
> We've added a couple of those, and it could be done here, but putting
> them in the right order is a bit tricky, and I think we can avoid it.
I have already proposed a OF_DECLARE_RESET_CONTROLLER() implementation:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/20/395
I needed it for the STM32 timers, but it was not accepted.
Now, I perform the timers reset in the bootloader, but it shouldn't work
in your case.
Kind regards,
Maxime
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: <tyler.baker@linaro.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<peter.griffin@linaro.org>, <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
<dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Allowing reset controllers before SMP initialization (on ARM)?
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:42:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552F83F0.1090403@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2592960.UsK4Hr7GSl@wuerfel>
Hi Florian, Arnd,
On 04/16/2015 10:04 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 April 2015 17:51:18 Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In order to support initialization of the secondary core on BCM63138
>> SoCs, I would want to utilize a reset controller to release the
>> secondary CPU from reset [1].
>>
>> Here are multiple options:
>>
>> - expose a custom function which registers the reset controller platform
>> driver as early as possible, which is probably acceptable, but also
>> requires the DT machine descriptor to populate the platform bus earlier,
>> which we could completely avoid
> I think populating the platform bus earlier is not realistic, that
> would break lots of existing dependencies. In particular, we can't
> do it much earlier because it has to be done after the platform bus
> itself is instantiated.
>
>> - have a OF_DECLARE_RESET_CONTROLLER() which is running fairly early
>> during boot, such that we can utilize reset controllers are early as
>> possible, before any initcall level, and before SMP initialization is
>> kicking in
> We've added a couple of those, and it could be done here, but putting
> them in the right order is a bit tricky, and I think we can avoid it.
I have already proposed a OF_DECLARE_RESET_CONTROLLER() implementation:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/20/395
I needed it for the STM32 timers, but it was not accepted.
Now, I perform the timers reset in the bootloader, but it shouldn't work
in your case.
Kind regards,
Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-16 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-16 0:51 Allowing reset controllers before SMP initialization (on ARM)? Florian Fainelli
2015-04-16 0:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-16 8:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-16 8:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-16 9:42 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2015-04-16 9:42 ` Maxime Coquelin
2015-04-18 19:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-18 19:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-16 18:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-16 18:04 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552F83F0.1090403@st.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.