From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christoffer Dall" <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>,
"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:39:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55300FDA.1010606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150416191044.GF6186@cbox>
On 16/04/2015 21:10, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> >
> As it turns out, it was not the same logic as Stephen's resolution.
> Stephen's resolution is bussy, because vlr is passed by value to
> vgic_queue_irq_to_lr() and therefore the call to sync the elrsr does not
> have any effect.
>
> Unfortunately, it seems Paolo's more correct fix did not end up in
> Linus' tree, so I guess I should just send a patch?
Uhm, sure it did :)
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c#n1121
Stephen's resolutions never end up in Linus's tree, as Stephen never
sends anything to Linus.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-16 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 3:41 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-18 7:55 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-07 16:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-08 8:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-08 8:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-08 10:57 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-16 19:10 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-16 19:39 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-04-16 20:16 ` Christoffer Dall
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-13 0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-05 4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-03 2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-03 9:50 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-06 2:56 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-06 2:52 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-10 4:02 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-10 8:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2014-10-17 1:47 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-31 6:30 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-31 12:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-07-31 12:10 ` Marc Zyngier
[not found] ` <CAEDV+gJ1oSPzgZMO=kdFDNPnzy-EOHGuLxHqTB8KO6d_8yPrxQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-07-31 12:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-07-31 12:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-07-31 14:23 ` Christoffer Dall
2014-07-31 14:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-07-31 14:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-01 5:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-31 12:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-31 12:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55300FDA.1010606@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=cdall@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.