Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with Linus' tree

[Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>]

On Thu, Jul 31 2014 at 03:23:47 PM, Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:15:40PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 31 2014 at 12:53:03 pm BST, Christoffer Dall
>> <christofferdall@christofferdall.dk> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Christoffer,
>> 
>> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> > <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hi all,
>> >    
>> >     Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
>> >     virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit 63afbe7a0ac1 ("kvm: arm64: vgic: fix
>> >     hyp panic with 64k pages on juno platform") from Linus' tree and commit
>> >     8f186d522c69 ("KVM: ARM: vgic: split GICv2 backend from the main vgic
>> >     code") and others from the kvm-arm tree.
>> >    
>> >     I fixed it up (the latter extensively rewrites the function, so I just
>> >     used that) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
>> >
>> > Hmm that doesn't look correct, the checks  for
>> > PAGE_ALIGNED(vcpu_res.start) and PAGE_ALIGNED(resource_size(vcpu_res))
>> > still need to be enforced for both vgic-v2 and vgic-v3.  How do we
>> > provide a correct fix for Linux-next?
>> 
>> I've provided a resolution for GICv2 in a separate email. For GICv3, I
>> have the following patch in my tree, which can be added at a later time.
>> 
> The GICv3 build fix and the GICv3 fix you provided here are now both
> in kvmarm/next.

Excellent, thanks Christoffer.

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.