From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
Subject: Re: AM335x OMAP2 common clock external fixed-clock registration
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:37:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55301D7F.30708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150416161756.GA27590@deathray>
On 16.04.2015 18:17, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:32:32AM +0300, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> On 04/15/2015 11:51 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:45:53PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> wrote:
[...]
>>>>> There is still an issue with the si5351.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had to comment out the clk_put here for the frequency to show up:
>>>>> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c#L1133
>>>>>
>>>>> Ideas?
>>>>
>>>> What is the most recent upstream commit that you are based on?
>>>
>>> I am working from 4.0.0-rc7.
>>>
>>> 7b43b47373d40d557cd7e1a84a0bd8ebc4d745ab
>>
>> Hmm, I wonder why si5351 calls clk_put immediately after of_clk_get
>> in the first place, as far as I understand this destroys the clock
>> handle, which is still being used later in the code.
>
> Not sure how this ever worked. This has been in the code since the
> initial commit.
The reason it worked before may be related with recent rework of
clk_put() itself and clk cookies instead of pointers. I lost track on
the recent clk subsystem changes here, sorry.
However, droping the clk immediately surely isn't right.
The thing is, we can remove the clk_put() just because there is no
_remove() for that driver. I remember that back in the days the driver
was mainlined, clk removal wasn't too easy.
FWIW, as soon as _remove() support will be added by someone, we'll have
to rethink passing struct clk* by platform_data or at least
double-check if we ever used [of_]clk_get() to obtain it.
Mind to send a patch removing the clk_put() on !IS_ERR and add a proper
error path instead? While of_clk_get() is the only calls that need
cleanup on error in si5351_dt_parse() we should probably move that
calls to the end of this function. Otherwise we'd also have to cleanup
on every of_parse_foo() failure.
Sebastian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: AM335x OMAP2 common clock external fixed-clock registration
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:37:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55301D7F.30708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150416161756.GA27590@deathray>
On 16.04.2015 18:17, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:32:32AM +0300, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> On 04/15/2015 11:51 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:45:53PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> wrote:
[...]
>>>>> There is still an issue with the si5351.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had to comment out the clk_put here for the frequency to show up:
>>>>> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c#L1133
>>>>>
>>>>> Ideas?
>>>>
>>>> What is the most recent upstream commit that you are based on?
>>>
>>> I am working from 4.0.0-rc7.
>>>
>>> 7b43b47373d40d557cd7e1a84a0bd8ebc4d745ab
>>
>> Hmm, I wonder why si5351 calls clk_put immediately after of_clk_get
>> in the first place, as far as I understand this destroys the clock
>> handle, which is still being used later in the code.
>
> Not sure how this ever worked. This has been in the code since the
> initial commit.
The reason it worked before may be related with recent rework of
clk_put() itself and clk cookies instead of pointers. I lost track on
the recent clk subsystem changes here, sorry.
However, droping the clk immediately surely isn't right.
The thing is, we can remove the clk_put() just because there is no
_remove() for that driver. I remember that back in the days the driver
was mainlined, clk removal wasn't too easy.
FWIW, as soon as _remove() support will be added by someone, we'll have
to rethink passing struct clk* by platform_data or at least
double-check if we ever used [of_]clk_get() to obtain it.
Mind to send a patch removing the clk_put() on !IS_ERR and add a proper
error path instead? While of_clk_get() is the only calls that need
cleanup on error in si5351_dt_parse() we should probably move that
calls to the end of this function. Otherwise we'd also have to cleanup
on every of_parse_foo() failure.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-16 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-14 21:17 AM335x OMAP2 common clock external fixed-clock registration Michael Welling
2015-04-14 21:17 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-15 6:34 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-15 6:34 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-15 6:34 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-15 14:09 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-15 14:09 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-15 18:43 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-15 18:43 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-15 18:43 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-15 19:47 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-15 19:47 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-15 20:45 ` Mike Turquette
2015-04-15 20:45 ` Mike Turquette
2015-04-15 20:51 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-15 20:51 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-16 4:32 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-16 4:32 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-16 16:17 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-16 16:17 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-16 20:37 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2015-04-16 20:37 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
[not found] ` <55301D7F.30708-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-16 22:09 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-16 22:09 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-16 22:09 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-16 23:23 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-04-16 23:23 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-04-16 23:23 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
[not found] ` <55304486.5020404-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-17 2:00 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-17 2:00 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-17 2:00 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-17 7:13 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-17 7:13 ` Tero Kristo
2015-04-17 9:12 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-04-17 9:12 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-04-17 9:12 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-04-17 10:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-17 10:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-17 19:06 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-17 19:06 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-17 19:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-17 19:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-17 19:56 ` Michael Turquette
2015-04-17 19:56 ` Michael Turquette
2015-04-17 16:59 ` Michael Welling
2015-04-17 16:59 ` Michael Welling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55301D7F.30708@gmail.com \
--to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@zonque.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=mwelling@ieee.org \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.