From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6/6] arm64: wait for transmit completion before next character transmission
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 05:01:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <553197BE.7060705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429291343.5479.22.camel@infradead.org>
On Friday 17 April 2015 10:52 PM, Geoff Levand wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 22:17 +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>> Previous transmission must be completed before next character to be
>> transmitted, otherwise TX buffer may saturate and we will not see all
>> the characters on screen.
>>
>> @@ -34,6 +38,8 @@ static const char arm64_opts_usage[] __attribute__ ((unused)) =
>> " --lite Fast reboot, no memory integrity checks.\n"
>> " --page-offset Kernel page-offset for binary image load.\n"
>> " --port=ADDRESS Purgatory output to port ADDRESS.\n"
>> +" --port-lsr=ADDRESS Purgatory output port line status ADDRESS.\n"
>> +" --port-lsr-val=VALUE Purgatory output port Line status expected SET value when TX empty.\n"
>> " --ramdisk=FILE Use FILE as the kernel initial ramdisk.\n"
>> " --reuse-cmdline Use command line arg of primary kernel.\n";
>
> We just need to put some chars to the screen, so I want to avoid a lot
> of parameters.
>
I was not able to get even two lines print without it :(
> Usually the status register is at a fixed offset from the TX port. Is
> that not the case for the ARM uarts?
>
> Can't we just poll port-lsr until empty then start writing again? That
> will at least eliminate port-lsr-val.
>
infact my first version was using a direct offset with port. Both are
fixed in most of the cases as offset 0x14 and value 0x60.
OK, I will remove the param for now. if someone finds any different
values then later on we can add it.
~Pratyush
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-17 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-16 16:47 [PATCH RFC 0/6] Various fixes for purgatory and ARM64 Pratyush Anand
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] purgatory: Fix memcmp for src address increment Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 16:55 ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-20 0:25 ` Simon Horman
2015-04-22 11:19 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-23 2:23 ` Simon Horman
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] purgatory: No need to sha256 update if ptr->len is zero Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 16:58 ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-17 23:26 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-20 3:01 ` Baoquan He
2015-04-20 3:18 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] arm64: allocate memory for other segments after kernel Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 16:59 ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-20 3:21 ` Baoquan He
2015-04-21 4:19 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-21 10:06 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-22 6:16 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] arm64: support reuse-cmdline option Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 17:02 ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] arm64: Add support for binary image Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 17:07 ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-17 18:00 ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-17 23:27 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-20 7:24 ` Baoquan He
2015-04-21 4:42 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-22 2:53 ` Baoquan He
2015-04-22 11:19 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-16 16:47 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] arm64: wait for transmit completion before next character transmission Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 5:36 ` Minfei Huang
2015-04-17 5:37 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-20 2:58 ` Baoquan He
2015-04-20 3:34 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 17:22 ` Geoff Levand
2015-04-17 23:31 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2015-04-16 23:54 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] Various fixes for purgatory and ARM64 Simon Horman
2015-04-17 1:27 ` Dave Young
2015-04-17 2:48 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-17 17:27 ` Geoff Levand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=553197BE.7060705@redhat.com \
--to=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=geoff@infradead.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.fedoraproject.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.