Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] dmaengine/dra7x: DMA router (crossbar support)

[Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>]

On 04/09/2015 12:35 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Vinod: is it OK if I send the Documnetation/dmanegine/ update a bit later when
> I have finished it?
> 
> Changes since v4:
> - Comments from Maxime Ripard addressed:
>  - long line fixed in of-dma.c
>  - node leaks has been fixed in ti-dma-crossbar
>  - Using devm_ioremap_resource() in ti-dma-crossbar
>  - u16 casting has been addressed
> - Router drivers are expected to return with ERR_PTR in case their
>   of_dma_route_allocate() callback fails.

Are there more comments I need to address with this series?

Thanks,
Péter

> Changes since v3:
> - Comments from Russell:
>  - Warnings removed in case of non DT boot when taking the DMA request number
>  - Reduced the number of channels presented to DMAengine
>  - removed the dma_sig parameter from omap_dma_chan_init()
> - Comments from Arnd:
>  - dma-device property renamed to dma-masters
>  - Allow list of phandes in dma-masters
> 
> Changes since v2:
> - not using regmap for the TI crossbar driver.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Comments from Russell King and  Paul Bolle addressed:
>  - Use the added defined in the omap-dma changes
>  - MODULE_* removed from the ti-dma-crossbar driver.
> - DMA router documentation: do not limit the #dma-cells to be the same as the
>   dma controller's #dma-cells. It might be possible to have a router which needs
>   more information than the DMA controller (direct request pairing for example)
> - Use defines in the ti-dma-crossbar driver
> - Binding document for the ti-dma-crossbar driver
> 
> Intro mail from v1:
> 
> The series adds support for DMA router type of devices. They are used in SoCs
> which has more peripherals with DMA request lines than the DMA controller can
> handle.
> The router itself is not part of the DMA controller and it's operation should be
> transparent (as it is in the HW) for the SW stack.
> 
> This series takes into accound the comments Sricharan received for his version
> of the crossbar driver:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/199
> 
> This implementation is not tied to any DMA driver so it is possible to use the
> framework by other vendors, also ACPI version of binding can be easy enough to
> be added.
> 
> Regards,
> Peter
> ---
> Peter Ujfalusi (8):
>   dmaengine: of_dma: Support for DMA routers
>   Documentation: devicetree: dma: Binding documentation for TI DMA
>     crossbar
>   dmaengine: Add driver for TI DMA crossbar on DRA7x
>   dmaengine: omap-dma: Use defines for dma channels and request count
>   dmaengine: omap-dma: Take DMA request number from DT if it is
>     available
>   dmaengine: omap-dma: Remove mapping between virtual channels and
>     requests
>   dmaengine: omap-dma: Reduce the number of virtual channels
>   ARM: DTS: dra7x: Integrate sDMA crossbar
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt      |  28 +++
>  .../devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.txt    |  52 ++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi                        |  57 ++++---
>  drivers/dma/Kconfig                                |   4 +
>  drivers/dma/Makefile                               |   1 +
>  drivers/dma/dmaengine.c                            |   7 +
>  drivers/dma/of-dma.c                               |  89 ++++++++++
>  drivers/dma/omap-dma.c                             |  29 +++-
>  drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c                      | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/dmaengine.h                          |  17 ++
>  include/linux/of_dma.h                             |  21 +++
>  11 files changed, 463 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>