From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: at91: remove at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 legacy board support
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:09:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5538141.cVWd2O2c59@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417434919.30245.31.camel@x220>
On Monday 01 December 2014 12:55:19 Paul Bolle wrote:
>
> There might be a problem with this patch. Or maybe it only needs some
> follow up cleanup. I noticed that when it landed in today's linux-next
> (ie, next-20141201) as commit b2026f708e09 ("ARM: at91: remove
> at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 legacy board support").
Good catch!
> The Kconfig symbol SND_AT91_SOC_AFEB9260 (see sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig)
> still depends on MACH_AFEB9260. So it can't be set anymore. Is that
> Kconfig symbol still needed or should it be removed too? Maybe a patch
> that fixes that is queued somewhere already.
I already found some other code that is now unused. I would guess that
this is in the same category, but the maintainers should comment if
they know better.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: at91: remove at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 legacy board support
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:09:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5538141.cVWd2O2c59@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417434919.30245.31.camel@x220>
On Monday 01 December 2014 12:55:19 Paul Bolle wrote:
>
> There might be a problem with this patch. Or maybe it only needs some
> follow up cleanup. I noticed that when it landed in today's linux-next
> (ie, next-20141201) as commit b2026f708e09 ("ARM: at91: remove
> at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 legacy board support").
Good catch!
> The Kconfig symbol SND_AT91_SOC_AFEB9260 (see sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig)
> still depends on MACH_AFEB9260. So it can't be set anymore. Is that
> Kconfig symbol still needed or should it be removed too? Maybe a patch
> that fixes that is queued somewhere already.
I already found some other code that is now unused. I would guess that
this is in the same category, but the maintainers should comment if
they know better.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-01 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-19 10:31 [PATCH 0/4] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91sam9260/9g20 and at91sam9263 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: at91: remove at91sam9263 legacy board support Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:38 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:38 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-01 11:52 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-01 11:52 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-01 16:09 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-01 16:09 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-22 9:28 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-22 9:28 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-22 9:45 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-12-22 9:45 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-05 11:16 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-05 11:16 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: at91: remove at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 legacy boards files Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: at91: remove at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 legacy board support Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-01 11:55 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-01 11:55 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-01 16:09 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-12-01 16:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-19 10:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: at91/Kconfig: remove unused config options Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-19 10:31 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5538141.cVWd2O2c59@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.