From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>,
eric.auger@st.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@suse.de
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysbus: add irq_routing_notifier
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:33:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5538BC6A.2070307@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429779318-1810-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
On 23/04/2015 10:55, Eric Auger wrote:
> Add a new irq_routing_notifier notifier and its setter. This
> notifier is called on sysbus_connect_irq. The same notifier
> is used for all interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
I'm sorry, same problem here. The question is: why? :)
I can sort of understand why you want this, but not completely. I also
have all sorts of questions on the code that aren't answered. For
example, why does the notifier not get the N argument?
I also cannot understand why this is not a layering violation. Maybe
it's not, but it's hard to say without seeing the user.
Paolo
> ---
> hw/core/sysbus.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/hw/sysbus.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/sysbus.c b/hw/core/sysbus.c
> index b53c351..26579f1 100644
> --- a/hw/core/sysbus.c
> +++ b/hw/core/sysbus.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ qemu_irq sysbus_get_connected_irq(SysBusDevice *dev, int n)
> void sysbus_connect_irq(SysBusDevice *dev, int n, qemu_irq irq)
> {
> qdev_connect_gpio_out_named(DEVICE(dev), SYSBUS_DEVICE_GPIO_IRQ, n, irq);
> + if (dev->irq_routing_notifier) {
> + dev->irq_routing_notifier(dev, irq);
> + }
> }
>
> /* Check whether an MMIO region exists */
> @@ -307,6 +310,12 @@ MemoryRegion *sysbus_address_space(SysBusDevice *dev)
> return get_system_memory();
> }
>
> +void sysbus_set_irq_routing_notifier(SysBusDevice *dev,
> + IRQRoutingNotifier notifier)
> +{
> + dev->irq_routing_notifier = notifier;
> +}
> +
> static void sysbus_device_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *k = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> diff --git a/include/hw/sysbus.h b/include/hw/sysbus.h
> index d1f3f00..84166d9 100644
> --- a/include/hw/sysbus.h
> +++ b/include/hw/sysbus.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #define SYSTEM_BUS(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(BusState, (obj), TYPE_SYSTEM_BUS)
>
> typedef struct SysBusDevice SysBusDevice;
> +typedef void (*IRQRoutingNotifier)(SysBusDevice *dev, qemu_irq irq);
>
> #define TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE "sys-bus-device"
> #define SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj) \
> @@ -55,6 +56,8 @@ struct SysBusDevice {
> } mmio[QDEV_MAX_MMIO];
> int num_pio;
> pio_addr_t pio[QDEV_MAX_PIO];
> +
> + IRQRoutingNotifier irq_routing_notifier;
> };
>
> typedef int FindSysbusDeviceFunc(SysBusDevice *sbdev, void *opaque);
> @@ -100,4 +103,7 @@ static inline DeviceState *sysbus_try_create_simple(const char *name,
> return sysbus_try_create_varargs(name, addr, irq, NULL);
> }
>
> +void sysbus_set_irq_routing_notifier(SysBusDevice *dev,
> + IRQRoutingNotifier notifier);
> +
> #endif /* !HW_SYSBUS_H */
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>,
eric.auger@st.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@suse.de
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
christoffer.dall@linaro.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sysbus: add irq_routing_notifier
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:33:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5538BC6A.2070307@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429779318-1810-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
On 23/04/2015 10:55, Eric Auger wrote:
> Add a new irq_routing_notifier notifier and its setter. This
> notifier is called on sysbus_connect_irq. The same notifier
> is used for all interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
I'm sorry, same problem here. The question is: why? :)
I can sort of understand why you want this, but not completely. I also
have all sorts of questions on the code that aren't answered. For
example, why does the notifier not get the N argument?
I also cannot understand why this is not a layering violation. Maybe
it's not, but it's hard to say without seeing the user.
Paolo
> ---
> hw/core/sysbus.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/hw/sysbus.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/sysbus.c b/hw/core/sysbus.c
> index b53c351..26579f1 100644
> --- a/hw/core/sysbus.c
> +++ b/hw/core/sysbus.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ qemu_irq sysbus_get_connected_irq(SysBusDevice *dev, int n)
> void sysbus_connect_irq(SysBusDevice *dev, int n, qemu_irq irq)
> {
> qdev_connect_gpio_out_named(DEVICE(dev), SYSBUS_DEVICE_GPIO_IRQ, n, irq);
> + if (dev->irq_routing_notifier) {
> + dev->irq_routing_notifier(dev, irq);
> + }
> }
>
> /* Check whether an MMIO region exists */
> @@ -307,6 +310,12 @@ MemoryRegion *sysbus_address_space(SysBusDevice *dev)
> return get_system_memory();
> }
>
> +void sysbus_set_irq_routing_notifier(SysBusDevice *dev,
> + IRQRoutingNotifier notifier)
> +{
> + dev->irq_routing_notifier = notifier;
> +}
> +
> static void sysbus_device_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *k = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> diff --git a/include/hw/sysbus.h b/include/hw/sysbus.h
> index d1f3f00..84166d9 100644
> --- a/include/hw/sysbus.h
> +++ b/include/hw/sysbus.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #define SYSTEM_BUS(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(BusState, (obj), TYPE_SYSTEM_BUS)
>
> typedef struct SysBusDevice SysBusDevice;
> +typedef void (*IRQRoutingNotifier)(SysBusDevice *dev, qemu_irq irq);
>
> #define TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE "sys-bus-device"
> #define SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj) \
> @@ -55,6 +56,8 @@ struct SysBusDevice {
> } mmio[QDEV_MAX_MMIO];
> int num_pio;
> pio_addr_t pio[QDEV_MAX_PIO];
> +
> + IRQRoutingNotifier irq_routing_notifier;
> };
>
> typedef int FindSysbusDeviceFunc(SysBusDevice *sbdev, void *opaque);
> @@ -100,4 +103,7 @@ static inline DeviceState *sysbus_try_create_simple(const char *name,
> return sysbus_try_create_varargs(name, addr, irq, NULL);
> }
>
> +void sysbus_set_irq_routing_notifier(SysBusDevice *dev,
> + IRQRoutingNotifier notifier);
> +
> #endif /* !HW_SYSBUS_H */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-23 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-23 8:55 [PATCH] sysbus: add irq_routing_notifier Eric Auger
2015-04-23 8:55 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Auger
2015-04-23 9:33 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-04-23 9:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5538BC6A.2070307@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@linaro.org \
--cc=eric.auger@st.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.