All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org" <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <jmartinez@softcrates.net>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: omap: Fix PM runtime issue and remove most BANK_USED macros
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:12:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5538D3B6.7060305@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429632533-23285-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com>

Hi Tony,

On 04/21/2015 07:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Looks like omap_gpio_irq_type can return early at several places
> leaving a GPIO bank enabled without doing pm_runtime_put if wrong
> GPIO arguments are passed.
> 
> Instead of adding more complicated BANK_USED macros, let's fix the
> issue properly. We can pass is_irq flag to omap_enable_gpio_module
> and omap_disble_gpio_module. And with that we can remove all the
> similar code elsewhere to get rid of most BANK_USED macros.
> 
> Note that the reason for the BANK_USED macro is that we need to manage
> PM runtime on per GPIO bank basis. In the long run we want to move to
> using PM runtime counts for each GPIO line to determine if a GPIO
> bank is used. Once we have a solution for omap_enable_gpio_module
> and omap_disable_gpio_module, we can remove the remaining BANK_USED
> macros.

In general, this approach is ok for me - I've had not able to test this patch, but
I'm going to take a deeper look on it on Friday or at the beginning of next week.

But, honestly, there is one thing I really don't like :( see below pls.

> 
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <jmartinez@softcrates.net>
> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index d44e617..39a6312 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct gpio_bank {
>   #define BANK_USED(bank) (bank->mod_usage || bank->irq_usage)
>   #define LINE_USED(line, offset) (line & (BIT(offset)))
>   
> +static void omap_reset_gpio(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset);
>   static void omap_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d);
>   
>   static inline struct gpio_bank *omap_irq_data_get_bank(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -419,8 +420,16 @@ static int omap_set_gpio_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static void omap_enable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
> +static void omap_enable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset,
> +				    bool is_irq)
>   {
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	/* PM runtime is per bank, not per GPIO line */
> +	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> +		pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>   	if (bank->regs->pinctrl) {
>   		void __iomem *reg = bank->base + bank->regs->pinctrl;
>   
> @@ -438,11 +447,30 @@ static void omap_enable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
>   		writel_relaxed(ctrl, reg);
>   		bank->context.ctrl = ctrl;
>   	}
> +
> +	if (is_irq) {
> +		omap_set_gpio_direction(bank, offset, 1);
> +		bank->irq_usage |= BIT(offset);
> +	} else {
> +		omap_set_gpio_triggering(bank, offset, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +		bank->mod_usage |= BIT(offset);
> +	}

The OMAP GPIO driver implements two Core interfaces IRQ-chip and GPIO-chip which, in general,
more or less independent. 

So, I don't think, that it's good to mix GPIO-IRQ-chip specific code with GPIO-chip code.
And this even don't really correspond the purpose of omap_enable_gpio_module() :( and might
introduce misunderstanding of code. The worst thing is that future fixes in IRQ-chip may 
affect on on GPIO-chip and vise versa :(

Could we keep omap_xxx_gpio_module() functions responsible only for GPIO bank PM and
enabling/disabling?

> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>   }
>   
> -static void omap_disable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
> +static void omap_disable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset,
> +				     bool is_irq)
>   {
>   	void __iomem *base = bank->base;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> +	if (is_irq)
> +		bank->irq_usage &= ~(BIT(offset));
> +	else
> +		bank->mod_usage &= ~(BIT(offset));
> +
> +	omap_reset_gpio(bank, offset);
>   
>   	if (bank->regs->wkup_en &&
>   	    !LINE_USED(bank->mod_usage, offset) &&
> @@ -463,6 +491,11 @@ static void omap_disable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
>   		writel_relaxed(ctrl, reg);
>   		bank->context.ctrl = ctrl;
>   	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> +
> +	/* PM runtime is per bank, not per GPIO line */
> +	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> +		pm_runtime_put(bank->dev);
>   }
>   
>   static int omap_gpio_is_input(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
> @@ -472,15 +505,6 @@ static int omap_gpio_is_input(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
>   	return readl_relaxed(reg) & BIT(offset);
>   }
>   
> -static void omap_gpio_init_irq(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
> -{
> -	if (!LINE_USED(bank->mod_usage, offset)) {
> -		omap_enable_gpio_module(bank, offset);
> -		omap_set_gpio_direction(bank, offset, 1);
> -	}
> -	bank->irq_usage |= BIT(offset);
> -}
> -
>   static int omap_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = omap_irq_data_get_bank(d);
> @@ -488,9 +512,6 @@ static int omap_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   	unsigned offset = d->hwirq;
>   
> -	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> -		pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
> -
>   	if (type & ~IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> @@ -498,13 +519,9 @@ static int omap_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
>   		(type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW|IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)))
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> +	omap_enable_gpio_module(bank, offset, true);
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>   	retval = omap_set_gpio_triggering(bank, offset, type);
> -	omap_gpio_init_irq(bank, offset);
> -	if (!omap_gpio_is_input(bank, offset)) {
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>   
>   	if (type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
> @@ -659,26 +676,8 @@ static int omap_gpio_wake_enable(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int enable)
>   static int omap_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = container_of(chip, struct gpio_bank, chip);
> -	unsigned long flags;
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * If this is the first gpio_request for the bank,
> -	 * enable the bank module.
> -	 */
> -	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> -		pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> -	/* Set trigger to none. You need to enable the desired trigger with
> -	 * request_irq() or set_irq_type(). Only do this if the IRQ line has
> -	 * not already been requested.
> -	 */
> -	if (!LINE_USED(bank->irq_usage, offset)) {
> -		omap_set_gpio_triggering(bank, offset, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> -		omap_enable_gpio_module(bank, offset);
> -	}
> -	bank->mod_usage |= BIT(offset);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> +	omap_enable_gpio_module(bank, offset, false);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -686,20 +685,8 @@ static int omap_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>   static void omap_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = container_of(chip, struct gpio_bank, chip);
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> -	bank->mod_usage &= ~(BIT(offset));
> -	omap_disable_gpio_module(bank, offset);
> -	omap_reset_gpio(bank, offset);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * If this is the last gpio to be freed in the bank,
> -	 * disable the bank module.
> -	 */
> -	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> -		pm_runtime_put(bank->dev);
> +	omap_disable_gpio_module(bank, offset, false);
>   }
>   
>   /*
> @@ -788,15 +775,9 @@ exit:
>   static unsigned int omap_gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = omap_irq_data_get_bank(d);
> -	unsigned long flags;
>   	unsigned offset = d->hwirq;
>   
> -	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> -		pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> -	omap_gpio_init_irq(bank, offset);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> +	omap_enable_gpio_module(bank, offset, true);
>   	omap_gpio_unmask_irq(d);
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -805,21 +786,9 @@ static unsigned int omap_gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
>   static void omap_gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = omap_irq_data_get_bank(d);
> -	unsigned long flags;
>   	unsigned offset = d->hwirq;
>   
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> -	bank->irq_usage &= ~(BIT(offset));
> -	omap_disable_gpio_module(bank, offset);
> -	omap_reset_gpio(bank, offset);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If this is the last IRQ to be freed in the bank,
> -	 * disable the bank module.
> -	 */
> -	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> -		pm_runtime_put(bank->dev);
> +	omap_disable_gpio_module(bank, offset, true);
>   }
>   
>   static void omap_gpio_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> 


-- 
regards,
-grygorii

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: grygorii.strashko@linaro.org (Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: omap: Fix PM runtime issue and remove most BANK_USED macros
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:12:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5538D3B6.7060305@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429632533-23285-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com>

Hi Tony,

On 04/21/2015 07:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Looks like omap_gpio_irq_type can return early at several places
> leaving a GPIO bank enabled without doing pm_runtime_put if wrong
> GPIO arguments are passed.
> 
> Instead of adding more complicated BANK_USED macros, let's fix the
> issue properly. We can pass is_irq flag to omap_enable_gpio_module
> and omap_disble_gpio_module. And with that we can remove all the
> similar code elsewhere to get rid of most BANK_USED macros.
> 
> Note that the reason for the BANK_USED macro is that we need to manage
> PM runtime on per GPIO bank basis. In the long run we want to move to
> using PM runtime counts for each GPIO line to determine if a GPIO
> bank is used. Once we have a solution for omap_enable_gpio_module
> and omap_disable_gpio_module, we can remove the remaining BANK_USED
> macros.

In general, this approach is ok for me - I've had not able to test this patch, but
I'm going to take a deeper look on it on Friday or at the beginning of next week.

But, honestly, there is one thing I really don't like :( see below pls.

> 
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <jmartinez@softcrates.net>
> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index d44e617..39a6312 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct gpio_bank {
>   #define BANK_USED(bank) (bank->mod_usage || bank->irq_usage)
>   #define LINE_USED(line, offset) (line & (BIT(offset)))
>   
> +static void omap_reset_gpio(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset);
>   static void omap_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d);
>   
>   static inline struct gpio_bank *omap_irq_data_get_bank(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -419,8 +420,16 @@ static int omap_set_gpio_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static void omap_enable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
> +static void omap_enable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset,
> +				    bool is_irq)
>   {
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	/* PM runtime is per bank, not per GPIO line */
> +	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> +		pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>   	if (bank->regs->pinctrl) {
>   		void __iomem *reg = bank->base + bank->regs->pinctrl;
>   
> @@ -438,11 +447,30 @@ static void omap_enable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
>   		writel_relaxed(ctrl, reg);
>   		bank->context.ctrl = ctrl;
>   	}
> +
> +	if (is_irq) {
> +		omap_set_gpio_direction(bank, offset, 1);
> +		bank->irq_usage |= BIT(offset);
> +	} else {
> +		omap_set_gpio_triggering(bank, offset, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +		bank->mod_usage |= BIT(offset);
> +	}

The OMAP GPIO driver implements two Core interfaces IRQ-chip and GPIO-chip which, in general,
more or less independent. 

So, I don't think, that it's good to mix GPIO-IRQ-chip specific code with GPIO-chip code.
And this even don't really correspond the purpose of omap_enable_gpio_module() :( and might
introduce misunderstanding of code. The worst thing is that future fixes in IRQ-chip may 
affect on on GPIO-chip and vise versa :(

Could we keep omap_xxx_gpio_module() functions responsible only for GPIO bank PM and
enabling/disabling?

> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>   }
>   
> -static void omap_disable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
> +static void omap_disable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset,
> +				     bool is_irq)
>   {
>   	void __iomem *base = bank->base;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> +	if (is_irq)
> +		bank->irq_usage &= ~(BIT(offset));
> +	else
> +		bank->mod_usage &= ~(BIT(offset));
> +
> +	omap_reset_gpio(bank, offset);
>   
>   	if (bank->regs->wkup_en &&
>   	    !LINE_USED(bank->mod_usage, offset) &&
> @@ -463,6 +491,11 @@ static void omap_disable_gpio_module(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
>   		writel_relaxed(ctrl, reg);
>   		bank->context.ctrl = ctrl;
>   	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> +
> +	/* PM runtime is per bank, not per GPIO line */
> +	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> +		pm_runtime_put(bank->dev);
>   }
>   
>   static int omap_gpio_is_input(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
> @@ -472,15 +505,6 @@ static int omap_gpio_is_input(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
>   	return readl_relaxed(reg) & BIT(offset);
>   }
>   
> -static void omap_gpio_init_irq(struct gpio_bank *bank, unsigned offset)
> -{
> -	if (!LINE_USED(bank->mod_usage, offset)) {
> -		omap_enable_gpio_module(bank, offset);
> -		omap_set_gpio_direction(bank, offset, 1);
> -	}
> -	bank->irq_usage |= BIT(offset);
> -}
> -
>   static int omap_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = omap_irq_data_get_bank(d);
> @@ -488,9 +512,6 @@ static int omap_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   	unsigned offset = d->hwirq;
>   
> -	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> -		pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
> -
>   	if (type & ~IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> @@ -498,13 +519,9 @@ static int omap_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
>   		(type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW|IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)))
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> +	omap_enable_gpio_module(bank, offset, true);
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>   	retval = omap_set_gpio_triggering(bank, offset, type);
> -	omap_gpio_init_irq(bank, offset);
> -	if (!omap_gpio_is_input(bank, offset)) {
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>   
>   	if (type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
> @@ -659,26 +676,8 @@ static int omap_gpio_wake_enable(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int enable)
>   static int omap_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = container_of(chip, struct gpio_bank, chip);
> -	unsigned long flags;
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * If this is the first gpio_request for the bank,
> -	 * enable the bank module.
> -	 */
> -	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> -		pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> -	/* Set trigger to none. You need to enable the desired trigger with
> -	 * request_irq() or set_irq_type(). Only do this if the IRQ line has
> -	 * not already been requested.
> -	 */
> -	if (!LINE_USED(bank->irq_usage, offset)) {
> -		omap_set_gpio_triggering(bank, offset, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> -		omap_enable_gpio_module(bank, offset);
> -	}
> -	bank->mod_usage |= BIT(offset);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> +	omap_enable_gpio_module(bank, offset, false);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -686,20 +685,8 @@ static int omap_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>   static void omap_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = container_of(chip, struct gpio_bank, chip);
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> -	bank->mod_usage &= ~(BIT(offset));
> -	omap_disable_gpio_module(bank, offset);
> -	omap_reset_gpio(bank, offset);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * If this is the last gpio to be freed in the bank,
> -	 * disable the bank module.
> -	 */
> -	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> -		pm_runtime_put(bank->dev);
> +	omap_disable_gpio_module(bank, offset, false);
>   }
>   
>   /*
> @@ -788,15 +775,9 @@ exit:
>   static unsigned int omap_gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = omap_irq_data_get_bank(d);
> -	unsigned long flags;
>   	unsigned offset = d->hwirq;
>   
> -	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> -		pm_runtime_get_sync(bank->dev);
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> -	omap_gpio_init_irq(bank, offset);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> +	omap_enable_gpio_module(bank, offset, true);
>   	omap_gpio_unmask_irq(d);
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -805,21 +786,9 @@ static unsigned int omap_gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
>   static void omap_gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = omap_irq_data_get_bank(d);
> -	unsigned long flags;
>   	unsigned offset = d->hwirq;
>   
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> -	bank->irq_usage &= ~(BIT(offset));
> -	omap_disable_gpio_module(bank, offset);
> -	omap_reset_gpio(bank, offset);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If this is the last IRQ to be freed in the bank,
> -	 * disable the bank module.
> -	 */
> -	if (!BANK_USED(bank))
> -		pm_runtime_put(bank->dev);
> +	omap_disable_gpio_module(bank, offset, true);
>   }
>   
>   static void omap_gpio_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> 


-- 
regards,
-grygorii

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-23 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-21 16:08 [PATCH 1/1] gpio: omap: Fix PM runtime issue and remove most BANK_USED macros Tony Lindgren
2015-04-21 16:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-22 14:20 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-04-22 14:20   ` Felipe Balbi
2015-04-23 11:12 ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org [this message]
2015-04-23 11:12   ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org
2015-04-23 14:39   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-23 14:39     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-28 21:57     ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org
2015-04-28 21:57       ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org
2015-04-29 14:26       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-29 14:26         ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-30 19:10         ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org
2015-04-30 19:10           ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org
2015-04-30 21:12           ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-30 21:12             ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-02 16:27             ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org
2015-05-02 16:27               ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org
2015-05-04 15:38               ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 15:38                 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-12  9:00 ` Linus Walleij
2015-05-12  9:00   ` Linus Walleij
2015-05-12 14:13   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-12 14:13     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-12 15:31     ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org
2015-05-12 15:31       ` Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5538D3B6.7060305@linaro.org \
    --to=grygorii.strashko@linaro.org \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmartinez@softcrates.net \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.