From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Jennifer Herbert <jennifer.herbert@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/4] xen: use ticket locks for spin locks
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:56:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <553FADA4.9080605@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5538FA930200007800075199@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 23/04/15 12:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> +typedef union {
>> + u32 head_tail;
>> + struct {
>> + u16 head;
>> + u16 tail;
>> + };
>> +} spinlock_tickets_t;
>> +
>> typedef struct spinlock {
>> - raw_spinlock_t raw;
>> + spinlock_tickets_t tickets;
>
> At least for x86 this means a growth of this and hence various
> other structures - did you examine the effects thereof? Of
> course otoh getting the lock size uniform across architectures
> is a good thing.
I've not looked.
Are there any structures whose size you're particularly concerned about?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-28 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 10:11 [PATCHv3 0/4] Use ticket locks for spinlocks David Vrabel
2015-04-21 10:11 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] x86: provide xadd() David Vrabel
2015-04-21 10:36 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-21 12:36 ` David Vrabel
2015-04-21 13:12 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-21 13:15 ` David Vrabel
2015-04-21 13:20 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-21 10:11 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] arm: " David Vrabel
2015-04-21 10:11 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] xen: use ticket locks for spin locks David Vrabel
2015-04-23 11:58 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-28 15:56 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2015-04-28 23:15 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-29 15:21 ` David Vrabel
2015-04-29 23:56 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-30 10:09 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-30 11:55 ` David Vrabel
2015-04-23 12:03 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 13:43 ` David Vrabel
2015-04-23 13:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-04-23 14:58 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 14:24 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 14:51 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 13:54 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-23 14:43 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 14:58 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-29 15:36 ` David Vrabel
2015-04-29 16:56 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-29 17:00 ` David Vrabel
2015-04-30 9:00 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-29 23:48 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-21 10:11 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] x86, arm: remove asm/spinlock.h from all architectures David Vrabel
2015-04-21 10:22 ` [PATCHv3 0/4] Use ticket locks for spinlocks Jan Beulich
2015-04-21 11:24 ` Jennifer Herbert
2015-04-23 12:42 ` David Vrabel
2015-04-30 15:44 ` David Vrabel
2015-05-04 7:18 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=553FADA4.9080605@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jennifer.herbert@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.