From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"al.stone@linaro.org" <al.stone@linaro.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"leo.duran@amd.com" <leo.duran@amd.com>,
"msalter@redhat.com" <msalter@redhat.com>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: ACPI: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:14:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554238D3.7050806@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150430135018.GH32373@arm.com>
On 2015年04月30日 21:50, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015年04月29日 22:42, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:31:03AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>> On 04/29/2015 09:04 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:44:08AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>>> Any plans for ACPI on 32-bit ARM?
>>>>
>>>> Not that I am aware, but I could be totally wrong. The reason I am adding
>>>> this here for 32-bit ARM is because the ACPI spec mentioned this.
>>>>
>>>> If you think this is not necessary until we introduce ACPI for ARM32, it can
>>>> be removed.
>>>
>>> I think it should be removed (as long as ACPI cannot be selected on
>>> arm32).
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> Now there is no plan for ARM32 ACPI as I know, ACPI for ARM targets
>> for ARM64 based enterprise system at now.
>
> While we're at it, do we *really* need to support CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
> on arm64? It's a deprecated /proc/acpi interface and it would be nice to
> avoid introducing deprecated behaviour if we can avoid it.
I agree. It is used for laptop ac adapter and battery, I will look
into that and clean it up for ARM64.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: ACPI: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:14:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554238D3.7050806@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150430135018.GH32373@arm.com>
On 2015?04?30? 21:50, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015?04?29? 22:42, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:31:03AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>> On 04/29/2015 09:04 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:44:08AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>>> Any plans for ACPI on 32-bit ARM?
>>>>
>>>> Not that I am aware, but I could be totally wrong. The reason I am adding
>>>> this here for 32-bit ARM is because the ACPI spec mentioned this.
>>>>
>>>> If you think this is not necessary until we introduce ACPI for ARM32, it can
>>>> be removed.
>>>
>>> I think it should be removed (as long as ACPI cannot be selected on
>>> arm32).
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> Now there is no plan for ARM32 ACPI as I know, ACPI for ARM targets
>> for ARM64 based enterprise system at now.
>
> While we're at it, do we *really* need to support CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
> on arm64? It's a deprecated /proc/acpi interface and it would be nice to
> avoid introducing deprecated behaviour if we can avoid it.
I agree. It is used for laptop ac adapter and battery, I will look
into that and clean it up for ARM64.
Thanks
Hanjun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"al.stone@linaro.org" <al.stone@linaro.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"leo.duran@amd.com" <leo.duran@amd.com>,
"msalter@redhat.com" <msalter@redhat.com>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: ACPI: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:14:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554238D3.7050806@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150430135018.GH32373@arm.com>
On 2015年04月30日 21:50, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015年04月29日 22:42, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:31:03AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>> On 04/29/2015 09:04 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:44:08AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>>> Any plans for ACPI on 32-bit ARM?
>>>>
>>>> Not that I am aware, but I could be totally wrong. The reason I am adding
>>>> this here for 32-bit ARM is because the ACPI spec mentioned this.
>>>>
>>>> If you think this is not necessary until we introduce ACPI for ARM32, it can
>>>> be removed.
>>>
>>> I think it should be removed (as long as ACPI cannot be selected on
>>> arm32).
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> Now there is no plan for ARM32 ACPI as I know, ACPI for ARM targets
>> for ARM64 based enterprise system at now.
>
> While we're at it, do we *really* need to support CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
> on arm64? It's a deprecated /proc/acpi interface and it would be nice to
> avoid introducing deprecated behaviour if we can avoid it.
I agree. It is used for laptop ac adapter and battery, I will look
into that and clean it up for ARM64.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-29 13:44 [PATCH 0/2] ACPI : Introduce support for _CCA object Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 13:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 13:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 13:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: ACPI: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 13:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 13:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-04-29 14:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-04-29 14:31 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:31 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:31 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-04-29 14:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-04-29 14:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-30 13:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-04-30 13:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-04-30 13:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-04-30 13:50 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 13:50 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 13:50 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 14:14 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-04-30 14:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-04-30 14:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-04-30 15:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-04-30 15:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-04-29 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 13:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 13:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 14:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 14:45 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:45 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:45 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 14:47 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 14:57 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2015-04-29 14:57 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2015-04-29 15:39 ` Al Stone
2015-04-29 15:39 ` Al Stone
2015-04-29 16:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 16:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-01 11:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-01 11:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-08 14:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-08 14:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-11 17:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-11 17:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-11 17:24 ` Robin Murphy
2015-05-11 17:24 ` Robin Murphy
2015-04-29 16:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 16:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 21:53 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 21:53 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-29 21:53 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-30 8:23 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 8:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 10:41 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 10:41 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 10:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 10:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 11:07 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 11:07 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 11:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 11:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 11:46 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 11:46 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 13:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 13:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 13:13 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 13:13 ` Will Deacon
2015-04-30 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 15:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-04-30 15:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-08 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-08 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 23:39 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-04-30 23:39 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-04-30 23:39 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554238D3.7050806@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.duran@amd.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.