From: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: ARM: EXYNOS: Fixes for 4.1
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 03:26:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554CFFEB.1010703@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430873718-22726-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
On 05/06/15 09:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Dear Kukjin,
>
> This groups important fix for current RC cycle. The patch was present
> on mailing list for quite long. It was tested. We had some
> disagreements about the solution but during discussion better ways for
> solving the issue were not presented.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The following changes since commit 5ebe6afaf0057ac3eaeb98defd5456894b446d22:
>
> Linux 4.1-rc2 (2015-05-03 19:22:23 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> https://github.com/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-fixes-4.1
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 23e15018316e949c534cc32e46502f3080dfc970:
>
> ARM: EXYNOS: Fix failed second suspend on Exynos4 (2015-05-05 19:17:58 +0900)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Fixes failed second suspend to RAM on Exynos4412 based Trats2 board. This has
> shown up after enabling L2 cache but actually the "use delayed reset assertion"
> feature is to be blamed.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (1):
> ARM: EXYNOS: Fix failed second suspend on Exynos4
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 39 ++-------------------------------------
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> --
Hi Krzysztof,
Yeah, the patch is old thing but if I remember correctly, I couldn't
apply it because of soc_is_xxx() macro. Yes, I agree with the way,
firstly fix something and if required, then update it later....But!
Please address comments about that, if not, it will not be accepted by
arm-soc tree.
Thanks,
Kukjin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene@kernel.org (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: ARM: EXYNOS: Fixes for 4.1
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 03:26:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554CFFEB.1010703@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430873718-22726-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
On 05/06/15 09:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Dear Kukjin,
>
> This groups important fix for current RC cycle. The patch was present
> on mailing list for quite long. It was tested. We had some
> disagreements about the solution but during discussion better ways for
> solving the issue were not presented.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The following changes since commit 5ebe6afaf0057ac3eaeb98defd5456894b446d22:
>
> Linux 4.1-rc2 (2015-05-03 19:22:23 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> https://github.com/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-fixes-4.1
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 23e15018316e949c534cc32e46502f3080dfc970:
>
> ARM: EXYNOS: Fix failed second suspend on Exynos4 (2015-05-05 19:17:58 +0900)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Fixes failed second suspend to RAM on Exynos4412 based Trats2 board. This has
> shown up after enabling L2 cache but actually the "use delayed reset assertion"
> feature is to be blamed.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (1):
> ARM: EXYNOS: Fix failed second suspend on Exynos4
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 39 ++-------------------------------------
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> --
Hi Krzysztof,
Yeah, the patch is old thing but if I remember correctly, I couldn't
apply it because of soc_is_xxx() macro. Yes, I agree with the way,
firstly fix something and if required, then update it later....But!
Please address comments about that, if not, it will not be accepted by
arm-soc tree.
Thanks,
Kukjin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-08 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-06 0:55 ARM: EXYNOS: Fixes for 4.1 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-05-06 0:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-05-08 18:26 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2015-05-08 18:26 ` Kukjin Kim
2015-05-09 0:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-05-09 0:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554CFFEB.1010703@kernel.org \
--to=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.