All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>,
	jic23@kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de,
	pmeerw@pmeerw.net
Cc: zmxu@marvell.com, jszhang@marvell.com, yrliao@marvell.com,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: berlin: add an ADC node for the BG2Q
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:06:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555A0E19.10807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431940760-23896-4-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>

On 18.05.2015 11:19, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> This patch adds the ADC node for the Berlin BG2Q, using the newly added
> Berlin IIO ADC driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> index 187d056f7ad2..97c7e19e3ec6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> @@ -565,6 +565,13 @@
>   						function = "twsi3";
>   					};
>   				};
> +
> +				adc: adc {
> +					compatible = "marvell,berlin2-adc";
> +					interrupt-parent = <&sic>;

Antoine,

a side note on the interrupt-parent property above:

The parent simple-bus node already contains that property. If you
remove the property here, don't the interrupt routines go up the
hierarchy until they find an interrupt-parent set?

So, is it safe to get rid of the extra interrupt-parent property on
the adc node?

Sebastian

> +					interrupts = <12>, <14>;
> +					interrupt-names = "adc", "tsen";
> +				};
>   			};
>
>   			sic: interrupt-controller@e000 {
>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: berlin: add an ADC node for the BG2Q
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:06:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555A0E19.10807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431940760-23896-4-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>

On 18.05.2015 11:19, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> This patch adds the ADC node for the Berlin BG2Q, using the newly added
> Berlin IIO ADC driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> index 187d056f7ad2..97c7e19e3ec6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
> @@ -565,6 +565,13 @@
>   						function = "twsi3";
>   					};
>   				};
> +
> +				adc: adc {
> +					compatible = "marvell,berlin2-adc";
> +					interrupt-parent = <&sic>;

Antoine,

a side note on the interrupt-parent property above:

The parent simple-bus node already contains that property. If you
remove the property here, don't the interrupt routines go up the
hierarchy until they find an interrupt-parent set?

So, is it safe to get rid of the extra interrupt-parent property on
the adc node?

Sebastian

> +					interrupts = <12>, <14>;
> +					interrupt-names = "adc", "tsen";
> +				};
>   			};
>
>   			sic: interrupt-controller at e000 {
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-18 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-18  9:19 [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: berlin: ADC support Antoine Tenart
2015-05-18  9:19 ` Antoine Tenart
2015-05-18  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] iio: adc: add support for Berlin Antoine Tenart
2015-05-18  9:19   ` Antoine Tenart
2015-05-23  9:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-05-23  9:48     ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-05-18  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] Documentation: bindings: document the Berlin ADC driver Antoine Tenart
2015-05-18  9:19   ` Antoine Tenart
2015-05-23  9:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-05-23  9:48     ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-05-18  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: berlin: add an ADC node for the BG2Q Antoine Tenart
2015-05-18  9:19   ` Antoine Tenart
2015-05-18 16:06   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2015-05-18 16:06     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=555A0E19.10807@gmail.com \
    --to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=yrliao@marvell.com \
    --cc=zmxu@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.