From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor TCP performance with ath10k in 4.0 kernel, again.
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:22:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555BC5D2.3090802@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555A5938.9080706@candelatech.com>
Additional info & pkt capture at bottom...
On 05/18/2015 02:27 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> Disclosure: I am working with a patched 4.0 kernel, patched ath10k driver, and
> patched (CT) ath10k firmware. Traffic generator is of our own making.
>
> First, this general problem has been reported before, but the
> work-arounds previously suggested do not fully resolve my problems.
>
> The basic issue is that when the sending socket is directly on top
> of a wifi interface (ath10k driver), then TCP throughput sucks.
>
> For instance, if AP interface sends to station, with 10 concurrent
> TCP streams, I see about 426Mbps. With 100 streams, I see total throughput
> of 750Mbps. These were maybe 10-30 second tests that I did.
>
> Interestingly, a single stream connection performs very poorly at first,
> but at least in one test, it eventually ran quite fast. It is too
> complicated to describe in words, but the graph is here:
>
> http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/single-tcp-4.0.pdf
>
> The 10-stream test did not go above about 450Mbps even after running for more than
> 1 minute, and it was fairly stable around the 450Mbps range after the first few seconds.
>
> 100-stream test shows nice stable aggregate throughput:
>
> http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/100-tcp-4.0.pdf
>
> I have tweaked the kernel tcp_limit_output_bytes setting
> (tested at 1024k too, did not make any significant difference).
>
> # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes
> 2048000
>
> I have tried forcing TCP send/rcv buffers to be 1MB and 2MB, but that
> did not make obvious difference except that it started at the maximum
> rate very quickly instead of taking a few seconds to train up to full speed.
>
> If I run a single-stream TCP test, sending on eth1 (Intel 1G NIC)
> through the AP machine, then single stream download is about 540 Mbps, and ramps up
> quickly. So, the AP can definitely send the needed amount of TCP packets.
>
> UDP throughput in download direction, single stream, is about 770Mbps, regardless
> of whether I originate the socket on the AP or if I pass it through the AP.
> send/recv bufs are set to 1MB for UDP sockets.
>
> The 3.17 kernel shows similar behaviour, and the 3.14 kernel is a lot better
> for TCP traffic.
>
> Are there tweaks other than tcp_limit_output_bytes that might
> improve this behaviour?
>
> I will be happy to grab captures or provide any other debugging info
> that someone thinks will be helpful.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
Here is a capture for the single stream vap -> station test case.
http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/vap-to-sta-1-stream.pcap.bz2
It starts fairly slow, and manages up to around 440Mbps before it plateaus.
The qdisc is pfifo_fast (this is Fedora 19 system). The interface being used for
this test is 'vap1'. This is the sender system.
[root@ct523-1ac-lr201408006507 tmp]# tc qdisc
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth1 root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc mq 0: dev wlan0 root
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :1 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :3 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :4 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc mq 0: dev vap1 root
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :1 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :3 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :4 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor TCP performance with ath10k in 4.0 kernel, again.
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:22:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555BC5D2.3090802@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555A5938.9080706@candelatech.com>
Additional info & pkt capture at bottom...
On 05/18/2015 02:27 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> Disclosure: I am working with a patched 4.0 kernel, patched ath10k driver, and
> patched (CT) ath10k firmware. Traffic generator is of our own making.
>
> First, this general problem has been reported before, but the
> work-arounds previously suggested do not fully resolve my problems.
>
> The basic issue is that when the sending socket is directly on top
> of a wifi interface (ath10k driver), then TCP throughput sucks.
>
> For instance, if AP interface sends to station, with 10 concurrent
> TCP streams, I see about 426Mbps. With 100 streams, I see total throughput
> of 750Mbps. These were maybe 10-30 second tests that I did.
>
> Interestingly, a single stream connection performs very poorly at first,
> but at least in one test, it eventually ran quite fast. It is too
> complicated to describe in words, but the graph is here:
>
> http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/single-tcp-4.0.pdf
>
> The 10-stream test did not go above about 450Mbps even after running for more than
> 1 minute, and it was fairly stable around the 450Mbps range after the first few seconds.
>
> 100-stream test shows nice stable aggregate throughput:
>
> http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/100-tcp-4.0.pdf
>
> I have tweaked the kernel tcp_limit_output_bytes setting
> (tested at 1024k too, did not make any significant difference).
>
> # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes
> 2048000
>
> I have tried forcing TCP send/rcv buffers to be 1MB and 2MB, but that
> did not make obvious difference except that it started at the maximum
> rate very quickly instead of taking a few seconds to train up to full speed.
>
> If I run a single-stream TCP test, sending on eth1 (Intel 1G NIC)
> through the AP machine, then single stream download is about 540 Mbps, and ramps up
> quickly. So, the AP can definitely send the needed amount of TCP packets.
>
> UDP throughput in download direction, single stream, is about 770Mbps, regardless
> of whether I originate the socket on the AP or if I pass it through the AP.
> send/recv bufs are set to 1MB for UDP sockets.
>
> The 3.17 kernel shows similar behaviour, and the 3.14 kernel is a lot better
> for TCP traffic.
>
> Are there tweaks other than tcp_limit_output_bytes that might
> improve this behaviour?
>
> I will be happy to grab captures or provide any other debugging info
> that someone thinks will be helpful.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
Here is a capture for the single stream vap -> station test case.
http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/vap-to-sta-1-stream.pcap.bz2
It starts fairly slow, and manages up to around 440Mbps before it plateaus.
The qdisc is pfifo_fast (this is Fedora 19 system). The interface being used for
this test is 'vap1'. This is the sender system.
[root@ct523-1ac-lr201408006507 tmp]# tc qdisc
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth1 root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc mq 0: dev wlan0 root
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :1 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :3 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :4 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc mq 0: dev vap1 root
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :1 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :3 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :4 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb-my8/4N5VtI7c+919tysfdA@public.gmane.org>
To: "linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
ath10k <ath10k-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
netdev <netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Poor TCP performance with ath10k in 4.0 kernel, again.
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:22:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555BC5D2.3090802@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555A5938.9080706-my8/4N5VtI7c+919tysfdA@public.gmane.org>
Additional info & pkt capture at bottom...
On 05/18/2015 02:27 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> Disclosure: I am working with a patched 4.0 kernel, patched ath10k driver, and
> patched (CT) ath10k firmware. Traffic generator is of our own making.
>
> First, this general problem has been reported before, but the
> work-arounds previously suggested do not fully resolve my problems.
>
> The basic issue is that when the sending socket is directly on top
> of a wifi interface (ath10k driver), then TCP throughput sucks.
>
> For instance, if AP interface sends to station, with 10 concurrent
> TCP streams, I see about 426Mbps. With 100 streams, I see total throughput
> of 750Mbps. These were maybe 10-30 second tests that I did.
>
> Interestingly, a single stream connection performs very poorly at first,
> but at least in one test, it eventually ran quite fast. It is too
> complicated to describe in words, but the graph is here:
>
> http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/single-tcp-4.0.pdf
>
> The 10-stream test did not go above about 450Mbps even after running for more than
> 1 minute, and it was fairly stable around the 450Mbps range after the first few seconds.
>
> 100-stream test shows nice stable aggregate throughput:
>
> http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/100-tcp-4.0.pdf
>
> I have tweaked the kernel tcp_limit_output_bytes setting
> (tested at 1024k too, did not make any significant difference).
>
> # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes
> 2048000
>
> I have tried forcing TCP send/rcv buffers to be 1MB and 2MB, but that
> did not make obvious difference except that it started at the maximum
> rate very quickly instead of taking a few seconds to train up to full speed.
>
> If I run a single-stream TCP test, sending on eth1 (Intel 1G NIC)
> through the AP machine, then single stream download is about 540 Mbps, and ramps up
> quickly. So, the AP can definitely send the needed amount of TCP packets.
>
> UDP throughput in download direction, single stream, is about 770Mbps, regardless
> of whether I originate the socket on the AP or if I pass it through the AP.
> send/recv bufs are set to 1MB for UDP sockets.
>
> The 3.17 kernel shows similar behaviour, and the 3.14 kernel is a lot better
> for TCP traffic.
>
> Are there tweaks other than tcp_limit_output_bytes that might
> improve this behaviour?
>
> I will be happy to grab captures or provide any other debugging info
> that someone thinks will be helpful.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
Here is a capture for the single stream vap -> station test case.
http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/vap-to-sta-1-stream.pcap.bz2
It starts fairly slow, and manages up to around 440Mbps before it plateaus.
The qdisc is pfifo_fast (this is Fedora 19 system). The interface being used for
this test is 'vap1'. This is the sender system.
[root@ct523-1ac-lr201408006507 tmp]# tc qdisc
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth1 root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc mq 0: dev wlan0 root
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :1 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :3 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev wlan0 parent :4 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc mq 0: dev vap1 root
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :1 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :3 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev vap1 parent :4 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb-my8/4N5VtI7c+919tysfdA@public.gmane.org>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-18 21:27 Poor TCP performance with ath10k in 4.0 kernel, again Ben Greear
2015-05-18 21:27 ` Ben Greear
2015-05-19 23:22 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-05-19 23:22 ` Ben Greear
2015-05-19 23:22 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555BC5D2.3090802@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.