Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] pci: add pci_iomap_wc() variants

[Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2462 bytes --]



On 20/05/15 02:45, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:29 PM, David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
>>>> [-cc Venkatesh (bouncing)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>>>> <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks! Who's tree should this go through?
>>>>
>>>> I don't know.  This is the only patch that went to linux-pci, so I
>>>> haven't seen the rest.
>>>
>>> Oh I only rev'd a v5 for 1/5 as that's the only one that had feedback
>>> asking for changes.
>>>
>>> Patch v4 2/5 was for "lib: devres: add pcim_iomap_wc() variants", you
>>> had questions about EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() and the fact that this is not
>>> yet used. I replied. This patch can then be ignored but again, I'd
>>> hate for folks to go in and try to add a non EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
>>> symbol of this.
>>>
>>> Patches v4 3-5 remain intact, I had addressed it to you, but failed to
>>> Cc linux-pci, I'll go ahead and bounce those now.
>>>
>>> Just today Dave Arlie provided a Reviewed-by to some simple
>>> framebuffer device driver changes. I wonder if these changes should go
>>> through the framebuffer tree provided you already gave the Acked-by
>>> for the PCI parts, or if the PCI parts should go in first and only
>>> later (I guess we'd have to wait) then intake the driver changes that
>>> use the symbol.
>>>
>>> What we decide should likely also apply to the series that adds
>>> pci_ioremap_wc_bar() and makes use of it on drivers.
>>>
>>> Dave, Tomi, any preference?
>>>
>>
>> Maybe send Bjorn a pull request with a tree with the pci changes, and the fb changes reviewed-by me and acked by Tomi.
>>
>> Seems like it could be the simplest path forward.
> 
> Works with me, Bjorn, are you OK with that?
> 
> Dave, Tomi, I still need your Reviewed-by and Acked-by's Tomi on these
> two PCI series. Please let me know if I should resend those first, but
> I think I had Cc'd you folks already on them.

For the fb parts:

Acked-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>

I don't have anything in my fbdev-next branch touching the fbdev drivers
changed in this series, so merging via some other tree might go fine
without conflicts.

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]