All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Michal Suchanek"
	<hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
	"Ulf Hansson"
	<ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard"
	<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	"David Lanzendörfer"
	<david.lanzendoerfer-Z7Kmv9EsliU@public.gmane.org>,
	"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>,
	"Peter Griffin"
	<peter.griffin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sunxi: fix timeout in sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 08:58:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5562C7FA.4050905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4011290915a42fce8b9c19d59f3ca9c3289a6817.1432491958.git.hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Hi,

On 24-05-15 20:07, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> The 250ms timeout is too short.
>
> On my system enabling the oclk takes under 50ms and disabling slightly
> over 100ms when idle. Under load disabling the clock can take over
> 350ms.
>
> This does not make mmc clock gating look like good option to have on
> sunxi but the system should not crash with mmc clock gating enabled
> nonetheless.
>
> This patch sets the timeout to 750ms and adds debug prints which show
> how long enabling/disabling the clock took so more data can be collected
> from other systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Looks good: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Regards,

Hans


> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index 4d3e1ff..7cdeecd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sunxi_mmc_handle_manual_stop(int irq, void *dev_id)
>
>   static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>   {
> -	unsigned long expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(250);
> +	unsigned long start, end;
>   	u32 rval;
>
>   	rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_CLKCR);
> @@ -604,6 +604,8 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>   	if (oclk_en)
>   		rval |= SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON;
>
> +	start = jiffies;
> +	end = start + msecs_to_jiffies(750);
>   	mmc_writel(host, REG_CLKCR, rval);
>
>   	rval = SDXC_START | SDXC_UPCLK_ONLY | SDXC_WAIT_PRE_OVER;
> @@ -611,15 +613,29 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>
>   	do {
>   		rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_CMDR);
> -	} while (time_before(jiffies, expire) && (rval & SDXC_START));
> +	} while (time_before(jiffies, end) && (rval & SDXC_START));
> +	end = jiffies;
>
>   	/* clear irq status bits set by the command */
>   	mmc_writel(host, REG_RINTR,
>   		   mmc_readl(host, REG_RINTR) & ~SDXC_SDIO_INTERRUPT);
>
>   	if (rval & SDXC_START) {
> -		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "fatal err update clk timeout\n");
> +		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +			"fatal err update oclk timeout. Could not %s in %ims.\n",
> +			oclk_en ? "enable" : "disable",
> +			jiffies_to_msecs(end-start));
>   		return -EIO;
> +	} else {
> +		int msecs = jiffies_to_msecs(end-start);
> +		const char *ing = oclk_en ? "enabling" : "disabling";
> +
> +		if ((msecs > 150) || (oclk_en && (msecs > 50)))
> +			dev_warn(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +				 "%s oclk took %ims", ing, msecs);
> +		else
> +			dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +				 "%s oclk took %ims", ing, msecs);
>   	}
>
>   	return 0;
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sunxi: fix timeout in sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 08:58:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5562C7FA.4050905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4011290915a42fce8b9c19d59f3ca9c3289a6817.1432491958.git.hramrach@gmail.com>

Hi,

On 24-05-15 20:07, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> The 250ms timeout is too short.
>
> On my system enabling the oclk takes under 50ms and disabling slightly
> over 100ms when idle. Under load disabling the clock can take over
> 350ms.
>
> This does not make mmc clock gating look like good option to have on
> sunxi but the system should not crash with mmc clock gating enabled
> nonetheless.
>
> This patch sets the timeout to 750ms and adds debug prints which show
> how long enabling/disabling the clock took so more data can be collected
> from other systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>

Looks good: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Regards,

Hans


> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index 4d3e1ff..7cdeecd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sunxi_mmc_handle_manual_stop(int irq, void *dev_id)
>
>   static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>   {
> -	unsigned long expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(250);
> +	unsigned long start, end;
>   	u32 rval;
>
>   	rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_CLKCR);
> @@ -604,6 +604,8 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>   	if (oclk_en)
>   		rval |= SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON;
>
> +	start = jiffies;
> +	end = start + msecs_to_jiffies(750);
>   	mmc_writel(host, REG_CLKCR, rval);
>
>   	rval = SDXC_START | SDXC_UPCLK_ONLY | SDXC_WAIT_PRE_OVER;
> @@ -611,15 +613,29 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>
>   	do {
>   		rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_CMDR);
> -	} while (time_before(jiffies, expire) && (rval & SDXC_START));
> +	} while (time_before(jiffies, end) && (rval & SDXC_START));
> +	end = jiffies;
>
>   	/* clear irq status bits set by the command */
>   	mmc_writel(host, REG_RINTR,
>   		   mmc_readl(host, REG_RINTR) & ~SDXC_SDIO_INTERRUPT);
>
>   	if (rval & SDXC_START) {
> -		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "fatal err update clk timeout\n");
> +		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +			"fatal err update oclk timeout. Could not %s in %ims.\n",
> +			oclk_en ? "enable" : "disable",
> +			jiffies_to_msecs(end-start));
>   		return -EIO;
> +	} else {
> +		int msecs = jiffies_to_msecs(end-start);
> +		const char *ing = oclk_en ? "enabling" : "disabling";
> +
> +		if ((msecs > 150) || (oclk_en && (msecs > 50)))
> +			dev_warn(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +				 "%s oclk took %ims", ing, msecs);
> +		else
> +			dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +				 "%s oclk took %ims", ing, msecs);
>   	}
>
>   	return 0;
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@gmail.com>,
	linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
	"Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	"David Lanzendörfer" <david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch>,
	"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
	"Peter Griffin" <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sunxi: fix timeout in sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 08:58:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5562C7FA.4050905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4011290915a42fce8b9c19d59f3ca9c3289a6817.1432491958.git.hramrach@gmail.com>

Hi,

On 24-05-15 20:07, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> The 250ms timeout is too short.
>
> On my system enabling the oclk takes under 50ms and disabling slightly
> over 100ms when idle. Under load disabling the clock can take over
> 350ms.
>
> This does not make mmc clock gating look like good option to have on
> sunxi but the system should not crash with mmc clock gating enabled
> nonetheless.
>
> This patch sets the timeout to 750ms and adds debug prints which show
> how long enabling/disabling the clock took so more data can be collected
> from other systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>

Looks good: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Regards,

Hans


> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index 4d3e1ff..7cdeecd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sunxi_mmc_handle_manual_stop(int irq, void *dev_id)
>
>   static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>   {
> -	unsigned long expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(250);
> +	unsigned long start, end;
>   	u32 rval;
>
>   	rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_CLKCR);
> @@ -604,6 +604,8 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>   	if (oclk_en)
>   		rval |= SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON;
>
> +	start = jiffies;
> +	end = start + msecs_to_jiffies(750);
>   	mmc_writel(host, REG_CLKCR, rval);
>
>   	rval = SDXC_START | SDXC_UPCLK_ONLY | SDXC_WAIT_PRE_OVER;
> @@ -611,15 +613,29 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>
>   	do {
>   		rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_CMDR);
> -	} while (time_before(jiffies, expire) && (rval & SDXC_START));
> +	} while (time_before(jiffies, end) && (rval & SDXC_START));
> +	end = jiffies;
>
>   	/* clear irq status bits set by the command */
>   	mmc_writel(host, REG_RINTR,
>   		   mmc_readl(host, REG_RINTR) & ~SDXC_SDIO_INTERRUPT);
>
>   	if (rval & SDXC_START) {
> -		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "fatal err update clk timeout\n");
> +		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +			"fatal err update oclk timeout. Could not %s in %ims.\n",
> +			oclk_en ? "enable" : "disable",
> +			jiffies_to_msecs(end-start));
>   		return -EIO;
> +	} else {
> +		int msecs = jiffies_to_msecs(end-start);
> +		const char *ing = oclk_en ? "enabling" : "disabling";
> +
> +		if ((msecs > 150) || (oclk_en && (msecs > 50)))
> +			dev_warn(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +				 "%s oclk took %ims", ing, msecs);
> +		else
> +			dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +				 "%s oclk took %ims", ing, msecs);
>   	}
>
>   	return 0;
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-25  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-24 18:25 [PATCH 0/2] sunxi a20 mmc timeout fix Michal Suchanek
2015-05-24 18:25 ` Michal Suchanek
     [not found] ` <cover.1432491958.git.hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-24 18:04   ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sunxi: Also set SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON Michal Suchanek
2015-05-24 18:04     ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-25  7:02     ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-25  7:02       ` Hans de Goede
     [not found]       ` <5562C90D.8070507-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-28  8:02         ` Ulf Hansson
2015-05-28  8:02           ` Ulf Hansson
2015-05-28  8:02           ` Ulf Hansson
     [not found]           ` <CAPDyKFrvB1AZGdvQ1fb6ShC8v-3DbVabiki13L8gG7M2saJALA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-28  8:04             ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-28  8:04               ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-28  8:04               ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-24 18:07   ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sunxi: fix timeout in sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff Michal Suchanek
2015-05-24 18:07     ` Michal Suchanek
     [not found]     ` <4011290915a42fce8b9c19d59f3ca9c3289a6817.1432491958.git.hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-25  1:44       ` Julian Calaby
2015-05-25  1:44         ` [linux-sunxi] " Julian Calaby
2015-05-25  1:44         ` Julian Calaby
2015-05-25  6:58       ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2015-05-25  6:58         ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-25  6:58         ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-25 21:02       ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-25 21:02         ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-25 21:02         ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5562C7FA.4050905@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=david.lanzendoerfer-Z7Kmv9EsliU@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=peter.griffin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.