All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: fix LOAD MULTIPLE instruction on page boundary
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 22:47:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55638A63.2030607@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5560D607.7080101@twiddle.net>



On 23.05.15 21:33, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 05/23/2015 12:59 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On 2015-05-21 14:42, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> Hmm.  Seems to be un/under-specified in the PoO.  That said,
>>
>> There is a small sentence in the PoO, in chapter "Program Execution",
>> section "Sequence of Storage Reference":
>>
>>    It can normally be assumed that the execution of
>>    each instruction occurs as an indivisible event.
> 
> Ah, I didn't think to look in a different chapter.  ;-)
> 
>>> It would be nice to know if there ought to be similar up-front access
>>> checking
>>> for STM, to avoid errant partial stores.
>>
>> I have just checked, the same is also true for STM instructions, though
>> it's probably more difficult to fix that in QEMU. Maybe we need a way to
>> check if a load/store will succeed, preferably without using a helper.
> 
> I did just suggest a new helper in the "unaligned stores for mips r6"
> thread. Therein we provide a probe_write helper that does assert that
> the given page is writable, or raise the usual exception.  It leaves the
> TLB updated, so a subsequent write should take the fast path.
> 
> It should be easy enough to extend that with an opcode so that we can
> implement this for s390 as
> 
>     probe_write    addr + n * size - 1
>     qemu_st        r0, addr
>     qemu_st        r1, addr + 1*size
>     ...
> 
> Hopefully for the edge case where both pages are unmapped, producing an
> exception pointing to the last byte, rather than the first byte, is
> acceptable.

So that means we should hold off on this patch for now as well and
rather go for the probe approach?


Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-25 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-21 21:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: fix LOAD MULTIPLE instruction on page boundary Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-21 21:42 ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-23  7:59   ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-23 19:33     ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-25 20:47       ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2015-05-25 21:04         ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-25 21:05       ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-25 21:55         ` Alexander Graf
2015-05-26  7:09           ` Peter Maydell
2015-05-26 16:23           ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-21 22:00 ` Alexander Graf
2015-05-23  8:22   ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-23  9:26     ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55638A63.2030607@suse.de \
    --to=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.