All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: fix LOAD MULTIPLE instruction on page boundary
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 23:55:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55639A39.1040408@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150525210516.GB29207@aurel32.net>



On 25.05.15 23:05, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-05-23 12:33, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 05/23/2015 12:59 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> On 2015-05-21 14:42, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>>> Hmm.  Seems to be un/under-specified in the PoO.  That said,
>>>
>>> There is a small sentence in the PoO, in chapter "Program Execution",
>>> section "Sequence of Storage Reference":
>>>
>>>   It can normally be assumed that the execution of
>>>   each instruction occurs as an indivisible event.
>>
>> Ah, I didn't think to look in a different chapter.  ;-)
>>
>>>> It would be nice to know if there ought to be similar up-front access checking
>>>> for STM, to avoid errant partial stores.
>>>
>>> I have just checked, the same is also true for STM instructions, though
>>> it's probably more difficult to fix that in QEMU. Maybe we need a way to
>>> check if a load/store will succeed, preferably without using a helper.
>>
>> I did just suggest a new helper in the "unaligned stores for mips r6"
>> thread. Therein we provide a probe_write helper that does assert that the
>> given page is writable, or raise the usual exception.  It leaves the TLB
>> updated, so a subsequent write should take the fast path.
> 
> I guess it would work for softmmu, but not in linux-user mode, though
> that's even more a corner case.

For linux-user we could just implement probe as

  foo = load_x_bytes(addr)
  store_x_bytes(addr, foo)

or can we have write-only maps there?


Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-25 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-21 21:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: fix LOAD MULTIPLE instruction on page boundary Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-21 21:42 ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-23  7:59   ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-23 19:33     ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-25 20:47       ` Alexander Graf
2015-05-25 21:04         ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-25 21:05       ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-25 21:55         ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2015-05-26  7:09           ` Peter Maydell
2015-05-26 16:23           ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-21 22:00 ` Alexander Graf
2015-05-23  8:22   ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-23  9:26     ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55639A39.1040408@suse.de \
    --to=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.