Re: [xen-unstable test] 56759: regressions - FAIL

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>]

Hi,

On 20/05/2015 11:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +0000, osstest service user wrote:
>> flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>>   test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 17 leak-check/check         fail REGR. vs. 56375
>
> I'm pretty hard pressed to explain this from the set of commits
> currently under test, but it has happened a few times now (e.g. 56700
> 56576) so it does seem to be real.
>
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect.xen-unstable.test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu.leak-check--check.html
> is working on it and is currently consider the set of changes from:
> ianc@cosworth:xen.git$ git log --oneline 9ab42~1...45fcc4
> 45fcc45 use ticket locks for spin locks
> e13013d libxc/restore: add checkpointed flag to the restore context
> ce44b40 libxc/restore: introduce setup() and cleanup() on restore
> c5c5a04 libxc/restore: split read/handle qemu info
> 9ab42c9 libxc/restore: introduce process_record()
>
> where e13013d is current master which was pushed in by flight 56375.
>
> I think it unlikely the libxl stuff is responible, given we don't
> migrate on ARM, which would seem to point to the ticket locks...

The test is still failing on the latest flight [1]. Any update on this 
issue?

Regards,

[1] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/57271/

-- 
Julien Grall