From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 56759: regressions - FAIL
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 10:56:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556837E7.3090400@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556705CE020000780007E76C@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 28/05/15 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 28.05.15 at 11:26, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 27.05.15 at 18:04, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>>>> I've now managed to reproduce using the arndale on my desk.
>>>> ... and now I've confirmed that reverting the spin lock change causes
>>>> the issue to not happen any more.
>>> Considering that this issue has prevented a push for almost
>>> two weeks, I think we ought to consider reverting the two
>>> offending commits until the problem got sorted out.
>> I think that would probably be wise. I'll try and figure out exactly
>> what is going on and propose some patches ASAP.
> Now done and pushed.
Wait what? This failure is not related to spinlocks; It is a networking
behavioural bug (hardware specific, even) which has been uncovered,
showing that there is a preexisting race condition.
It is not reasonable to revert a correct change because it has exposed
an existing race condition elsewhere. IMO, this should have been a
force push to mark the test as non-blocking.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-29 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-20 9:34 [xen-unstable test] 56759: regressions - FAIL osstest service user
2015-05-20 9:56 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-26 9:11 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-26 9:17 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-26 9:22 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-26 13:29 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-27 16:04 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-28 8:50 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-28 9:26 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-28 10:10 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-29 9:56 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2015-05-29 10:40 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-29 10:50 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-29 16:32 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-02 10:30 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-11 13:22 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556837E7.3090400@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.